| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39142
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:30 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.
_________________
 | theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26316
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Phire wrote: | So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department. |
The Jets OL always seems to stay healthy. Nick Mangold missed 2 games last season and Damien Woody missed some games in 2010. Other than that, the Jets OL has not had many injuries over the past 5 seasons.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9042
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Phire wrote: | So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department. |
Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it
_________________
 | HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkobow05
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 28893
Location: Props to PB87 for the RAD sig
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | Phire wrote: | So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department. |
Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it |
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO.
_________________
#teamRico
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | You'll always be my #1. <3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9042
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bkobow05 wrote: | | justo wrote: | | Phire wrote: | So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department. |
Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it |
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO. |
I think he's better than Saturday for sure. I meant that more as a shot at Saturday than anything else.
_________________
| HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkobow05
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 28893
Location: Props to PB87 for the RAD sig
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | bkobow05 wrote: | | justo wrote: | | Phire wrote: | So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).
How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department. |
Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it |
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO. |
I think he's better than Saturday for sure. I meant that more as a shot at Saturday than anything else. |
Ah okay, the way you worded sounded like you were dogging EDS.
_________________
#teamRico
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | You'll always be my #1. <3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Steelerspower
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 6513
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Per Jay Glazer on Fox, the Chiefs still haven't paid Haley's remaining salary
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RandyMossIsBoss
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 8043
Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Every team beat the team to the clockwise direction
_________________
Chip...Chip...Chipadelphia |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GaTechRavens
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 15543
Location: Knoxville, TN
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997.
_________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RandyMossIsBoss
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 8043
Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997. |
How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway?
_________________
Chip...Chip...Chipadelphia |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
texans_uk
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 24911
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm 100% positive that parity thing has been done in previous seasons.
_________________
| DallasInHeart wrote: | | Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9042
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | GaTechRavens wrote: | | The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997. |
How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway? |
Well isn't it like:
Play your division x 2 (6)
Play the teams that are ranked the same in their division as you in the same conference (3)
Rotating opposite conference (4)
+3???
I'm going to assume that it's because Miami and Denver haven't finished the same in their divisions during that time.
_________________
| HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9042
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | Every team beat the team to the clockwise direction
|
Packers 81 point favorites over the Lions? Seems accurate..
_________________
| HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
texans_uk
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 24911
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | GaTechRavens wrote: | | The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997. |
How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway? |
Well isn't it like:
Play your division x 2 (6)
Play the teams that are ranked the same in their division as you in the same conference (3)
Rotating opposite conference (4)
+3???
I'm going to assume that it's because Miami and Denver haven't finished the same in their divisions during that time. |
Pretty sure that format only came only came in when the Texans made it 32 teams.
_________________
| DallasInHeart wrote: | | Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9042
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anyone think that the Vikings should sign Adrian Peterson and play the Jacksonville Greg Joneses again?
_________________
| HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
