Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

The NFL General Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 80, 81, 82  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Phire


Moderator
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 50068
Location: #FSU #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #TrollyRangers #Danes #CAVALRY
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.
_________________
theuntouchable wrote:
Think about this phire. I am the real chow.

RainbowCarebear wrote:
Only for the quick and lucky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
green24


Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47651
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phire wrote:
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.

The Jets OL always seems to stay healthy. Nick Mangold missed 2 games last season and Damien Woody missed some games in 2010. Other than that, the Jets OL has not had many injuries over the past 5 seasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phire wrote:
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.


Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bkobow05


Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 48285
Location: Milwaukee, WI (PB87 on the RAD sig!)
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
Phire wrote:
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.


Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO.
_________________

#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bkobow05 wrote:
justo wrote:
Phire wrote:
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.


Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO.
I think he's better than Saturday for sure. I meant that more as a shot at Saturday than anything else.
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bkobow05


Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 48285
Location: Milwaukee, WI (PB87 on the RAD sig!)
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
bkobow05 wrote:
justo wrote:
Phire wrote:
So the Eagles have lost 80% of their starting offensive line (4 of 5).

How are other teams faring in keeping their big guys up front healthy? The Eagles never seem to fare well in that department.


Arguably the Packers best option at LT was on PUP and just came off. Newhouse is still the starter though, might be for the season. Packers RT got hurt so we moved over Lang (LG) there and have out back up C (EDS, dude that got stomped by Suh) at LG now. When you have a supposed backup to Jeff Saturday starting it's not a good thing. Jeff has lost it
How? EDS is pretty damn good IMO.
I think he's better than Saturday for sure. I meant that more as a shot at Saturday than anything else.
Ah okay, the way you worded sounded like you were dogging EDS.
_________________

#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelerspower


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 7742
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Per Jay Glazer on Fox, the Chiefs still haven't paid Haley's remaining salary
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RandyMossIsBoss


Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 19118
Location: Can't talk
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Every team beat the team to the clockwise direction

_________________


~Bird Watch 2014 | Nick Foles~
1,628 yards, 10 TDs, 7 INTs, 82.0 Passer Rating
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaTechRavens


Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 17673
Location: Madison, WI
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RandyMossIsBoss


Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 19118
Location: Can't talk
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GaTechRavens wrote:
The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997.


How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway?
_________________


~Bird Watch 2014 | Nick Foles~
1,628 yards, 10 TDs, 7 INTs, 82.0 Passer Rating
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
texans_uk


Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 29131
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm 100% positive that parity thing has been done in previous seasons.
_________________
DallasInHeart wrote:
Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RandyMossIsBoss wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997.


How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway?


Well isn't it like:
Play your division x 2 (6)
Play the teams that are ranked the same in their division as you in the same conference (3)
Rotating opposite conference (4)
+3???

I'm going to assume that it's because Miami and Denver haven't finished the same in their divisions during that time.
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RandyMossIsBoss wrote:
Every team beat the team to the clockwise direction


Packers 81 point favorites over the Lions? Seems accurate..
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
texans_uk


Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 29131
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
RandyMossIsBoss wrote:
GaTechRavens wrote:
The Broncos and Dolphins, despite being in the same conference, only played each other once between 1976 and 1997.


How does that happen? What was the scheduling format from 78-01 anyway?


Well isn't it like:
Play your division x 2 (6)
Play the teams that are ranked the same in their division as you in the same conference (3)
Rotating opposite conference (4)
+3???

I'm going to assume that it's because Miami and Denver haven't finished the same in their divisions during that time.


Pretty sure that format only came only came in when the Texans made it 32 teams.
_________________
DallasInHeart wrote:
Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13399
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone think that the Vikings should sign Adrian Peterson and play the Jacksonville Greg Joneses again?
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 80, 81, 82  Next
Page 17 of 82

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group