| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tom Shean
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 4604
Location: Tha 703
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
howie102
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 446
Location: London
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tom Shean
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 4604
Location: Tha 703
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| howie102 wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
That loss was in 2004 at the latest doe. He's knocked off wins in 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 twice.
So yeah he's pretty hot.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GaTechRavens
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 15581
Location: Knoxville, TN
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | howie102 wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
That loss was in 2004 at the latest doe. He's knocked off wins in 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 twice.
So yeah he's pretty hot. |
That was all on the defense. Manning usually hasn't done that well individually.
_________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flaccomania
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 16548
Location: Parkville, MD
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | howie102 wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
That loss was in 2004 at the latest doe. He's knocked off wins in 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 twice.
So yeah he's pretty hot. |
That was all on the defense. Manning usually hasn't done that well individually. |
Yep. We've generally held Peyton in check. Now, Freeney/Mathis on the other hand...
_________________
Why not Michael Jordan? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dunderhead
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 1653
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Badger75 wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | I'll play
NFC
1. Falcons
2. Bears
3. 49ers
4. Giants
5. Vikings
6. Rams
AFC
1. Texans
2. Ravens
3. Chargers
4. Pats
5. Bengals
6. Broncos
WC
Rams at 49ers
Vikings at Giants
Broncos at Chargers
Bengals at Pats
Divisonal
49ers at Bears
Giants at Falcons
Bengals at Texans
Chargers at Ravens
CCG
Giants at Bears
Ravens at Texans
SuperBowl
Bears over Ravens |
This seems most likely so far.  |
Wow, and I thought this was the worst of the bunch. Check out the Vikes scheduel... Tough. 2 against Chitown, 2 against Pack. No way they run that table and they have Houston... And how do the Rams get it? They have to play the Vikes. Almost mathematically impossible right there... Cause then the Bears can't be the #2 seed.
Oh, I get it! Its an old thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jgold72288
Joined: 09 Jul 2011
Posts: 506
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | howie102 wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
That loss was in 2004 at the latest doe. He's knocked off wins in 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 twice.
So yeah he's pretty hot. |
That was all on the defense. Manning usually hasn't done that well individually. |
Manning vs. Baltimore all-time:
7-2, 192/305 (63%), 8 YPA, 17 TD, 8 INT, 95.5 rating. You guys did a good job against him the first time around in the playoffs though.
_________________
"He used statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts; for support rather than illumination."
-Andrew Lang |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Papa-Pwn
Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 409
Location: Colorado/South Carolina
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | howie102 wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Manning never loses to Baltimore doe. His career record is like, 8-1 against them or something. |
So he does, in fact, lose to them, no?
I'd love to share your optimism, but teams can't always win those games that it ought to. Despite our D improving in leaps and bounds, and half-decent running game remains our kryptonite. |
That loss was in 2004 at the latest doe. He's knocked off wins in 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09 twice.
So yeah he's pretty hot. |
That was all on the defense. Manning usually hasn't done that well individually. |
Good thing the Broncos are a top 10 scoring and garage defense against both the run and pass 
Allowing the 2nd least YPC and notching the most sacks in the league, as well as the 2nd most defensive/STs scores |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
49ersfan
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 4604
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | Gun to my head (because it's that important):
AFC
1. Texans 13-3
2. Ravens 11-5
3. Patriots 11-5
4. Broncos 11-5
5. Steelers 9-7
6. Chargers 9-7
NFC
1. Falcons 14-2
2. Packers 12-4
3. 49ers 10-5-1
4. Giants 9-7
5. Bears 11-5
6. Seahawks 10-6 |
Not sure about the Chargers. 4-5 and those 4 wins have come against the Titans, Raiders, and Chiefs X2. They couldn't even beat the Browns. I can't see this team finishing 5-2 to end the year. I think it'll be the Colts or Dolphins in that 6th seed.
_________________
-Not taking this off until the 49ers win #6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DontTazeMeBro
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 20521
Location: 321
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
(6)Chargers @ (3)Broncos
(5)Colts @ (4)Patriots
(6)Cowboys @ (3)Giants
(5)Seahawks @ (4)49ers
(4)Patriots @ (1)Texans
(3)Broncos @ (2)Ravens
(4)49ers @ (1)Bears
(3)Giants @ (2)Falcons
(4)Patriots @ (2)Ravens
(3)Giants @ (1)Bears
Ravens vs. Bears
Couple thoughts
If Roethlisberger misses the Chargers game, I think that game is going to decide the #6 seed.
Packers keep getting hit by injuries. I think it's all about to start falling apart for them. Cowboys had an extremely front loaded schedule. I don't think they are a good team but I think they can string together enough wins versus this remaining schedule to sneak in through the backdoor. The head-to-head victory against Tampa could turn out to be huge.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
.flash
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 2752
Location: <- Coast
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DontTazeMeBro wrote: | | Packers keep getting hit by injuries. I think it's all about to start falling apart for them. |
That's how I feel when I look at the severity and amount of injuries we have. But I have to say I just don't think its possible for this team to fall apart with Aaron at the helm. We've hobbled to the Super Bowl before and I think this next stretch of NFC games (Lions 2x, Bears, Vikings, Giants) is going to be vital to our season. If we can grit our way through the upcoming schedule, I like our chances to be riding hot into the playoffs. We'll be getting Jennings, Woodson, Shields, Kuhn, Matthews, Sherrod and Quarless back in the coming weeks. Hopefully, its 2010 all over again.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jbegley8
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 81
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
AFC
1. Houston Texans
2. Baltimore Ravens
3. Denver Broncos
4. New England Patriots
5. Pittsburgh Steelers
6. Indianapolis Colts
Houston Texans vs. Denver Broncos
NFC
1. Chicago Bears
2. Atlanta Falcons
3. San Francisco 49ers
4. New York Giants
5. Green Bay Packers
6. Seattle Seahawks
San Francisco 49ers vs. Green Bay Packers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajdodge09
Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 4006
Location: Jobland looking for jobbies.
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| .flash wrote: | | DontTazeMeBro wrote: | | Packers keep getting hit by injuries. I think it's all about to start falling apart for them. |
That's how I feel when I look at the severity and amount of injuries we have. But I have to say I just don't think its possible for this team to fall apart with Aaron at the helm. We've hobbled to the Super Bowl before and I think this next stretch of NFC games (Lions 2x, Bears, Vikings, Giants) is going to be vital to our season. If we can grit our way through the upcoming schedule, I like our chances to be riding hot into the playoffs. We'll be getting Jennings, Woodson, Shields, Kuhn, Matthews, Sherrod and Quarless back in the coming weeks. Hopefully, its 2010 all over again. |
Don't forget about Benson. He looked significantly better than Green/Starks when he was in.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Badfish87
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Houston
New England
Denver
Baltimore
Pittsburgh
Indianapolis
Pit over Bal, Den over Ind
Hou over Pitt, Den over NE
Hou over Den
Atlanta
San Francisco
Green Bay
New York
Chicago
New Orleans
GB over NO, NY over Chi
SF over GB, Atl over NY
Atl over SF
Super Bowl: Houston 28 Atlanta 20 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pugger
Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 4345
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| .flash wrote: | | DontTazeMeBro wrote: | | Packers keep getting hit by injuries. I think it's all about to start falling apart for them. |
That's how I feel when I look at the severity and amount of injuries we have. But I have to say I just don't think its possible for this team to fall apart with Aaron at the helm. We've hobbled to the Super Bowl before and I think this next stretch of NFC games (Lions 2x, Bears, Vikings, Giants) is going to be vital to our season. If we can grit our way through the upcoming schedule, I like our chances to be riding hot into the playoffs. We'll be getting Jennings, Woodson, Shields, Kuhn, Matthews, Sherrod and Quarless back in the coming weeks. Hopefully, its 2010 all over again. |
He wishes.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
