| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tom Shean 
Joined: 10 Oct 2012 Posts: 4631 Location: Tha 703
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Gonna say it now. The Bears are my SB pick. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justo 
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 9112 Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=14939517#14939517
| Quote: | AFC
1 Houston Texans 14-2
2 New England Patriots 13-3
3 Denver Broncos 13-3
4 Pittsburgh Steelers 11-5
5* Miami Dolphins 9-7
5* New York Jets 9-7
5* Baltimore Ravens 9-7
NFC
1 Atlanta Falcons 15-1
2* New York Giants 13-3
2* Green Bay Packers 13-3
2* San Francisco 49ers 13-3
5 Seattle Seahawks 11-5
6 Chicago Beats 11-5 |
Denver>Green Bay in Super Bowl _________________
| jfinley88 wrote: | | Woke up in the shower wearing a frog costume with the nipples cut out and my face painted like a tiger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SteelKing728 
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 10881 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
updated:
AFC:
1) Houston Texans: 13-3
2) New England Patriots: 11-5
3) Baltimore Ravens: 10-6
4) Denver Broncos: 10-6
5) Pittsburgh Steelers: 9-7
6) Miami Dolphins: 8-8
NFC:
1) Atlanta Falcons: 13-3
2) Chicago Bears: 12-4
3) San Francisco 49ers: 12-4
4) New York Giants: 11-5
5) Greenbay Packers: 10-6
6) Seahawks/Redskins/Vikings: 9-7 (Dogfight till the end. Hawks with the edge)
Ravens over Dolphins
Broncos over Steelers
49ers over Seahawks
Giants over Packers
Texans over Broncos
Patriots over Ravens
Giants over Falcons
49ers over Bears
Texans over Patriots
Giants over 49ers
Texans over Giants _________________
Thanks Jamison on that avi.
2013 Adopt a Minnesota Viking - Jared Allen - DE - #69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
49ersfan
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 4612
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Crazy weak in the NFC.
ATL and the NYG lost. SF tied. CHI is currently losing, and GB is on a bye week.
Meanwhile, SEA, TB, MIN, all win today.
I think you can safely count out ARI, CAR, STL, WAS, and PHI.
DAL, DET, NO are on life support and have zero room for error.
In the AFC, the top 6 are seemingly set- HOU, BAL, PIT, NE, IND, DEN.
MIA, SD, CIN are 2 games behind the last WC spot at 4-5. TEN is somehow still there at 4-6. Every other team has 3 wins or less and are safely out of the playoff picture. _________________ -Not taking this off until the 49ers win #6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Finnerception 
Joined: 24 Sep 2008 Posts: 12985 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
AFC:
1. Houston Texans (12-4)
2. Denver Broncos (11-5)
3. Baltimore Ravens (11-5)
4. New England Patriots (11-5)
5. Pittsburgh Steelers (11-5)
6. Indianapolis Colts (10-6)
NFC:
1. Atlanta Falcons (12-4)
2. Green Bay Packers (12-4)
3. San Francisco 49ers (11-4-1)
4. New York Giants (10-6)
5. Chicago Bears (12-4)
6. Seattle Seahawks (10-6) _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UpTheSeam85
Joined: 23 Aug 2011 Posts: 477
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NFC
1. Falcons (13-3)
2. Packers (12-4)
3. 49ers (10-4-1)
4. Giants (9-7)
5. Bears (11-5)
6. Saints (9-7)
AFC
1. Texans (14-2)
2. Ravens (12-4)
3. Patriots (12-4)
4. Broncos (11-5)
5. Steelers (10-6)
6. Colts (9-7)
Playoffs
Saints vs 49ers
Bears vs Giants
Colts vs Patriots
Steelers vs Broncos
Giants vs Packers
Saints vs Falcons
Broncos vs Texans
Patriots vs Ravens
Saints vs Packers
Patriots vs Texans
Saints vs Texans
Last edited by UpTheSeam85 on Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JJ89 
Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 240 Location: Vejle, Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Looks good, but I think Saints will have to win 10 games to get into the playoffs because of Seattle. Seattle's remaining schedule will give them a total of 4 wins I think - in which case Saints will need to win one more game and then they would properly hold the tie-breaker over Seattle because of their record within the division.. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GaTechRavens 
 Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 15585 Location: Knoxville, TN
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Gun to my head (because it's that important):
AFC
1. Texans 13-3
2. Ravens 11-5
3. Patriots 11-5
4. Broncos 11-5
5. Steelers 9-7
6. Chargers 9-7
NFC
1. Falcons 14-2
2. Packers 12-4
3. 49ers 10-5-1
4. Giants 9-7
5. Bears 11-5
6. Seahawks 10-6 _________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UpTheSeam85
Joined: 23 Aug 2011 Posts: 477
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JJ89 wrote: | | Looks good, but I think Saints will have to win 10 games to get into the playoffs because of Seattle. Seattle's remaining schedule will give them a total of 4 wins I think - in which case Saints will need to win one more game and then they would properly hold the tie-breaker over Seattle because of their record within the division.. | Yes probably, but my hate for Seattle and wanting to mix things up had me put the Saints over them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Shean 
Joined: 10 Oct 2012 Posts: 4631 Location: Tha 703
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | Gun to my head (because it's that important):
AFC
6. Chargers 9-7
|
Very much doubt that.
Remaining schedule:
Broncos (6-3), vs. Ravens (7-2), vs. Bengals (4-5), at Steelers (6-3), vs. Panthers (2-7), at Jets (3-6), vs. Raiders (3-6)
I can see them winning only the Jets, Panthers and Raiders games from there, and knowing the Chargers they're likely to screw that up as well. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GaTechRavens 
 Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 15585 Location: Knoxville, TN
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | GaTechRavens wrote: | Gun to my head (because it's that important):
AFC
6. Chargers 9-7
|
Very much doubt that.
Remaining schedule:
Broncos (6-3), vs. Ravens (7-2), vs. Bengals (4-5), at Steelers (6-3), vs. Panthers (2-7), at Jets (3-6), vs. Raiders (3-6)
I can see them winning only the Jets, Panthers and Raiders games from there, and knowing the Chargers they're likely to screw that up as well. |
I think they'll handle the Bengals at home. And there's no way I'm ever picking us to win when we play them at their place, which happens to be EVERY FREAKING YEAR. I could see wins over Denver and Pittsburgh too, so maybe they trade that off with a loss in one of the other games.
Here I am trusting the Chargers again... _________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Shean 
Joined: 10 Oct 2012 Posts: 4631 Location: Tha 703
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GaTechRavens wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | GaTechRavens wrote: | Gun to my head (because it's that important):
AFC
6. Chargers 9-7
|
Very much doubt that.
Remaining schedule:
Broncos (6-3), vs. Ravens (7-2), vs. Bengals (4-5), at Steelers (6-3), vs. Panthers (2-7), at Jets (3-6), vs. Raiders (3-6)
I can see them winning only the Jets, Panthers and Raiders games from there, and knowing the Chargers they're likely to screw that up as well. |
I think they'll handle the Bengals at home. And there's no way I'm ever picking us to win when we play them at their place, which happens to be EVERY FREAKING YEAR. I could see wins over Denver and Pittsburgh too, so maybe they trade that off with a loss in one of the other games.
Here I am trusting the Chargers again... |
Just the fact that they're the Chargers means they'll inevitably lose. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Papa-Pwn
Joined: 15 Jul 2009 Posts: 409 Location: Colorado/South Carolina
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Finnerception, Uptheseam, Gatechravens; you all have the Broncos 11-5
For curiosity's sake, what two games do you see the Broncos losing the rest of the season?
Chargers
@Chiefs
Buccaneers
@Raiders
@Ravens
Browns
Chiefs
I can see a loss in Baltimore, but I feel a win is more likely. 12-4 or 13-3 is my guess, 2nd seed in the AFC
1. Houston 13-3
2. Denver 13-3
3. Patriots 11-5
4. Ravens 11-5
5. Steelers 10-6
6. Colts 9-7
1. Atlanta 14-2
2. Chicago 13-3
3. 49ers 12-4
4. Giants 9-7
5. Packers 12-4
6. Seahawks 9-7 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GaTechRavens 
 Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 15585 Location: Knoxville, TN
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Papa-Pwn wrote: | Finnerception, Uptheseam, Gatechravens; you all have the Broncos 11-5
For curiosity's sake, what two games do you see the Broncos losing the rest of the season?
Chargers
@Chiefs
Buccaneers
@Raiders
@Ravens
Browns
Chiefs
I can see a loss in Baltimore, but I feel a win is more likely. 12-4 or 13-3 is my guess, 2nd seed in the AFC
1. Houston 13-3
2. Denver 13-3
3. Patriots 11-5
4. Ravens 11-5
5. Steelers 10-6
6. Colts 9-7
1. Atlanta 14-2
2. Chicago 13-3
3. 49ers 12-4
4. Giants 9-7
5. Packers 12-4
6. Seahawks 9-7 |
On the road, it isn't more likely. Ravens have won 16 straight at home, and I still don't trust Peyton Manning to be himself on the road in December. I feel like one other team picks them off simply because it's so hard to beat every team you're supposed to. _________________
| ArrowheadRage58 wrote: | | I'd much rather be in our position now than the Ravens, that's for sure. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
norg 
Joined: 13 Jul 2008 Posts: 1522
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
dammit his is our year the TEXANS HAVE TO win the SB this year and i wouldnt be surprised if we get the hardest test a REMATCH
Aron rodgers and the packers in the superdome but dammit after like 40 years of all the highs n lows of the oilers and the texans somehow Houston finnalllyyyyy gets a RING |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|