| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mozwanted
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 16724
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:33 am Post subject: Houston most complete team i have seen in awile? |
 |
|
|
Is it just me. Or are these texans just so damn complete.
From defense they are good as anyone. The passing game has the ability to win shootouts and score at will. And the running game is just so damn efficent. Never seen a team who has the potential to be top 5 in every aspect of the game.
Over the years we seen elite teams with 1 or 2 of these traits. But this is the first time iam seeing all 3.
Last team i can remm who was great at defense, pass, run was the 2004 patriots and they didnt have a elite Wr like johnson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 27928
Location: #nosleep
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's not just you. They are the most complete team in the NFL. They have been my Super Bowl pick since before the offseason. They are going to absolutely demolish the Jets on Monday. 
_________________
JMG on the sig.
| jg6041 wrote: | | Jetsfandan423 wrote: | | So the Jets went paintballing yesterday. |
Did Goodson bring a real gun and ammo? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DontTazeMeBro
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 20678
Location: 321
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
They're up there. I'd probably put the 2006 Chargers ahead of them. 2009 Vikings are up there but I'd give the edge there to the Texans.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PurpleMugen
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though).
_________________
Peppers90 on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G3RMANATOR
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 2215
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have.
_________________
Thanks to Walter on the sig!^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vikefan79
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 25462
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| G3RMANATOR wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have. |
Agreed.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 39756
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Texans are clearly the best and most complete team in the league, though I am still slightly concerned about its WR situation outside of Andre Johnson. Nevertheless, they can matchup with anyone and play any kind of game they want. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15438
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I was thinking that before the season. sadface.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PurpleMugen
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| G3RMANATOR wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have. |
You're right. And the Texans don't have close to the offense the Vikings did.
_________________
Peppers90 on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mozwanted
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 16724
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PurpleMugen wrote: | | G3RMANATOR wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have. |
You're right. And the Texans don't have close to the offense the Vikings did. |
umm i would take the texans offense over 09 vikes anyday
they are avg more points per game than 09 vikes.
Not to mention they have better coaching.
Houston currently has #1defense and #2 offense |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PurpleMugen
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mozwanted wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | G3RMANATOR wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have. |
You're right. And the Texans don't have close to the offense the Vikings did. |
umm i would take the texans offense over 09 vikes anyday
they are avg more points per game than 09 vikes.
Not to mention they have better coaching.
Houston currently has #1defense and #2 offense |
What tremendous points! You do realize that the Texans' offensive stats are 4 games' worth, while the '09 Vikings' are 16 games' worth, yes? And the Vikings' offense was #2 in the NFL that year.
_________________
Peppers90 on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joru1000
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 1824
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Brett Favre was so on fire that year and we had Sidney Rice and he was actually good then.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G3RMANATOR
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 2215
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mozwanted wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | G3RMANATOR wrote: | | PurpleMugen wrote: | | 2009 Vikings. But this Texans team is in the conversation, too (edge to the '09 Vikings, though). |
Negative, Vikings didn't have close to a defense that the Texans have. |
You're right. And the Texans don't have close to the offense the Vikings did. |
umm i would take the texans offense over 09 vikes anyday
they are avg more points per game than 09 vikes.
Not to mention they have better coaching.
Houston currently has #1defense and #2 offense |
Foster+Ben Tate=Adrian peterson
Andre Johnson > Sidney Rice
Matt Schuab < Brett Favre
Texans O line > Vikings O line
I dont see how it was that much better, their very close in fact based off talent evaluation.
_________________
Thanks to Walter on the sig!^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patsfan25
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 2959
Location: CenCal
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't know if they are the most complete team i have seen in awile, but they are the most complete team I have seen in awhile.
_________________
| Ring Worm Sherm wrote: | | You're an complete idiot |
Aite,
Peace. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PurpleMugen
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| G3RMANATOR wrote: | Foster+Ben Tate=Adrian peterson
Andre Johnson > Sidney Rice
Matt Schuab < Brett Favre
Texans O line > Vikings O line
I dont see how it was that much better, their very close in fact based off talent evaluation. |
What a meaningless way to make a comparison.
Have you ever heard of this particular concept: "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts?"
_________________
Peppers90 on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
