Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New England Patriots
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mcmurtry86


Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 24508
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:36 pm    Post subject: Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant Reply with quote

Per Mike Reiss.

https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/252144495511101440



Not looking good for Mankins or the Pats OL
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rabbisson


Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 28837
Location: Stam#PoWwW
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant Reply with quote

mcmurtry86 wrote:
Per Mike Reiss.

https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/252144495511101440



Not looking good for Mankins or the Pats OL


Rodak thought it actually DID look good for Mankins, because they signed Tennant over Warren and Austin, both of whom practiced with the team this week.
_________________

Iggles wrote:
This guy gets it. Seriously, the ideas being espoused here need to get to 88 mph so they can go back to the 1950's.

I'm a cold-blooded dickens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NinjaZX6R


Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Posts: 9142
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant Reply with quote

rabbisson wrote:
mcmurtry86 wrote:
Per Mike Reiss.

https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/252144495511101440



Not looking good for Mankins or the Pats OL


Rodak thought it actually DID look good for Mankins, because they signed Tennant over Warren and Austin, both of whom practiced with the team this week.


Who is Warren and Austin?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mcmurtry86


Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 24508
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant Reply with quote

rabbisson wrote:
mcmurtry86 wrote:
Per Mike Reiss.

https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/252144495511101440



Not looking good for Mankins or the Pats OL


Rodak thought it actually DID look good for Mankins, because they signed Tennant over Warren and Austin, both of whom practiced with the team this week.


Not buying that in the slightest. The Pats are already carrying one game-day inactive on the interior OL. No need to add another unless Mankins' availability is in question.

Warren was awful in camp and I doubt Austin is much better (if at all) than Tennant.

This move IMO tells me that the Pats might prefer the option of using Wendell as the #3 G behind Thomas and Connolly in a Mankins-less scenario and would need someone to play C. Between McDonald's shoulder issue and the possible need to replace Thomas at G for awful play, adding Tennant over a PS guard makes sense.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mcmurtry86


Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 24508
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Pats re-sign C Matt Tennant Reply with quote

NinjaZX6R wrote:
rabbisson wrote:
mcmurtry86 wrote:
Per Mike Reiss.

https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/252144495511101440



Not looking good for Mankins or the Pats OL


Rodak thought it actually DID look good for Mankins, because they signed Tennant over Warren and Austin, both of whom practiced with the team this week.


Who is Warren and Austin?


Jeremiah Warren and Thomas Austin
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New England Patriots All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group