NFL Forum :: - GDT: BAL Ravens @ KC Chiefs (W5)

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

GDT: BAL Ravens @ KC Chiefs (W5)
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 Next

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Baltimore Ravens

View previous topic :: View next topic

How many receptions will Cary Williams allow?

0!!!!!!

10%

[ 2 ]

1-3

20%

[ 4 ]

4-6

35%

[ 7 ]

35%

[ 7 ]

Total Votes : 20

Author

Message

StRawz11

Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 3776
Location: Not in Pittsburgh

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject:

DontTazeMeBro wrote:

We completely shutdown the run in the 2nd half. Didn't give up a TD. Beat a pretty good team on the road. That's not easy to do. Offense was terrible. Hali/Houston gave us trouble as expected. Nothing on 3rd down. I'm not overly concerned about it right now.

Chiefs are not a "pretty good team". I will say going into Arrowhead and winning is a very tough thing to do though
_________________

"I'm dismantling who I was and moving it brick by brick."

StRawz11

Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 3776
Location: Not in Pittsburgh

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:16 pm Post subject:

Bengals lost as well
_________________

"I'm dismantling who I was and moving it brick by brick."

janky

Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 2166
Location: Bird land

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject:

StRawz11 wrote:

Bengals lost as well

Was hoping Steelers would lose too.

We definately have things to work on, but glad we squeeked this win out. We 4-1 yo Very Happy

_________________

DontTazeMeBro

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 27116
Location: 321

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:23 pm Post subject:

StRawz11 wrote:

DontTazeMeBro wrote:

Chiefs are not a "pretty good team". I will say going into Arrowhead and winning is a very tough thing to do though

I think they actually are. The numbers they put up in almost all areas are pretty good but they are crippled by an unbelievable amount of Cassell turnovers.
_________________

NJ Raven

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Posts: 2513
Location: NewJersey

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject:

DontTazeMeBro wrote:

StRawz11 wrote:

DontTazeMeBro wrote:

Chiefs are not a "pretty good team". I will say going into Arrowhead and winning is a very tough thing to do though

I think they actually are. The numbers they put up in almost all areas are pretty good but they are crippled by an unbelievable amount of Cassell turnovers.

Agreed. If they cut out the turnovers, they'd be a wild card contender.

bmore4life815

Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 3517
Location: HoCo, MD

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:36 pm Post subject:

I hate winning that ugly, but, hey, we're 4-1. I'm particularly proud of how our defense rebounded in the second half. Holding Charles to 15 yards on 10 carries was huge.

Speaking of which, him and that defense must be fed up with life right now. You can't ask any more of them.
_________________

mike23md

sp6488

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 11767
Location: MD

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject:

bmore4life815 wrote:

Just want to add that we clearly won that game. Wasn't pretty, but we did what was needed to win (much to the chagrin of the CBS production team Smile

). Chiefs fans in Gen right now saying that the Ravens had no business winning that game. A salty bunch those Chiefs fans are.
_________________

sp6488

Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 11767
Location: MD

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:00 pm Post subject:

kmvoss wrote:

Wow, to me it didn't look like we got that 1st down.

We absolutely got it, it was actually a short spot probably.
_________________

SnA ExclusiVe

Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 49882
Location: Hillsboro, OR

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?
_________________
#FireDeanPees...and Chris Hewitt....and Matt Weiss

nevermore

Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 7086
Location: Austria

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?

OL played bad, receivers dropped passes left and right, Flacco had no pocket awareness, and the D refused to tackle Jamaal Charles in the first half.

The Chiefs beat themselves today. To give you an example, Cassel fumbled a snap on 1st and Goal from the 1.
_________________

CKSteeler wrote:

There's something wrong with my Tom Brady voodoo doll. Everytime I break its leg with a rock, Gronkowski ends up hurting his back.

SnA ExclusiVe

Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 49882
Location: Hillsboro, OR

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:20 pm Post subject:

nevermore wrote:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?

I saw the general highlights, didn't know about the WR's dropping passes.

Who played good and who played bad for us? Obviously Cary and Webb played good and our pass defense wasn't bad considering we held them under 100 yards passing, right?

I saw that the OL did horrible (mainly our two horrible tackles), and I just assumed Flacco sucked as well.

How was the play calling? No huddle? Spread? I-form-PA-2WRsgoingdeep?
_________________
#FireDeanPees...and Chris Hewitt....and Matt Weiss

diamondbull424

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 13074
Location: Baltimore, MD

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:20 pm Post subject:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?

Think the Seattle game last year... Only Seattle has Matt Cassel as they're quarterback... And then think of that game being 3x uglier than you can imagine it being... And then you'd probably be scratching the surface.

It was that game a year where our whole team looks incompetent... Only by the luck of whatever football deities that Matt Cassel must have pissed off- we won the game.

I mean, I was planning on rewatching the game on rewind... But I don't think I could sit through that again if someone paid me.
_________________

SnA ExclusiVe

Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 49882
Location: Hillsboro, OR

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:26 pm Post subject:

diamondbull424 wrote:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?

Figures. We usually have between 2-4 of those games per season. Our defense obviously didn't do THAT bad to not allow a touchdown despite getting gashed by Charles for 2 quarters.

My biggest question is what was wrong with the offense? Were we going no huddle, shotgun and spreading or trying to do the stupid i-form and play action that HARDLY EVER works?
_________________
#FireDeanPees...and Chris Hewitt....and Matt Weiss

ArrowheadRage58

Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 7805
Location: Hate for the Donkeys is at a mile high

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject:

StRawz11 wrote:

DontTazeMeBro wrote:

Chiefs are not a "pretty good team". I will say going into Arrowhead and winning is a very tough thing to do though

Ngati is my new favorite player...I wish no serious harm to Cassel, but THANK YOU. You did not beat a good team....You beat a one dimensional team. However Quinn entering the game in the 4th immediately made them a good team...You all saw the pick play on the TD, those are never called and we got two of them against us, the only way they can call that is if McCluster seeks out a DB and hits him or gets in his way, which clearly did not happen. What do you guys think?

What about Charles? You knew it was coming every play and he goes for 125 in the first half...I even knew you guys would adjust and that wouldn't happen in the 2nd half...we could've hit Baldwin all day in single coverage, but didn't start trying it til it's too late. Chiefs coaches are clueless...maybe we can get just a little respect that the problem is QB and coaching, not talent. What do you say?

By the way, there is nothing wrong with your offense...you probly dropped a few more balls than normal, but like we've been saying the Chiefs D has been stout the last 2 games and that continued. You all know that game is a borderline blowout with halfway decent QB play by us.
_________________

BroncosFan2010 wrote:

Your Denver hatred is borderline pathological. I don't think my girlfriend cheating on me would cause me as much hate as you have for Denver.

Last edited by ArrowheadRage58 on Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:37 pm; edited 1 time in total

diamondbull424

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 13074
Location: Baltimore, MD

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

nevermore wrote:

SnA ExclusiVe wrote:

Sooo I had a scrimmage today for baseball, anyone want to sum up the game and why we only won by 3 points?

Actually Webb had another non-Webb game. The interception he caught was a gimme... Same with Williams FTMP. Balls batted up that they reacted to. But their coverage wasn't all that strong. Kruger was horrible setting the edge, but when he kept his hands active he was able to she'd blocks and make multiple tackles for a loss. He was our best defensive player today... And I only thought he had a "good" game, it looked awesome because of all his splash plays, but he was a big culprit of many of the Charles runs in the first half.

Kemo was pretty bad for most of the night. Looked a little better in the 2nd half. Cody did well and ate up blocks when given the chance. He was making plays.

Offense was doing their best Greg Little impression. Ray Lewis looked slow for most of the night, except a brutal hit he had on their backup RB.

The OL was trash, Flacco wasn't in rhythm, we lacked a playmaking talent. The defensive adjustments took way too long since the Chiefs just did the same rushing play for largely the first half.

Oh and Justin Tucker had an awesome special teams tackle. The 3 short kicks should probably help him to build his overall confidence back up.
_________________

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Baltimore Ravens All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next

Page 19 of 23

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum