| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bpastermack
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 12069
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I forgot about Suh! He would make it much tougher for QB's to step up into the pocket to avoid Wake... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ProudDolphan47
 Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 5015 Location: Lancaster, PA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hows Fat Man Paul Soliai going to deal with this news? _________________ -Proud 2011 Inductee to FF's Miami Dolphins RoH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finsyanksmancs 
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 3701 Location: Raleighwood
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
AJ Green anyone? Dude is nasty _________________
Sig by: PatsDynasty21 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mercury22 

Joined: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 12329 Location: the 50 yard line
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think I might go with Jason Pierre Paul. I also think Watt is a nice selection, but I want pass rush, and I love the way Pierre Paul plays the game. When we increase QB pressure, the corners will look a lot better, and since we can already shut down the run pretty well, I believe a pass rush will make our defense dominating.
It would be either Pierre Paul or Calvin Johnson. However, this regime seems to not "put a premium on stud WR's". My guess is that a year or two with a receiving corps like the one we have and they will be singing a different tune. _________________ "22 players are involved in every football play. To value precisely the activity of one of them, it is first necessary to account for the actions of the other 21" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phinmun
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 2231 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mercury22 wrote: | I think I might go with Jason Pierre Paul. I also think Watt is a nice selection, but I want pass rush, and I love the way Pierre Paul plays the game. When we increase QB pressure, the corners will look a lot better, and since we can already shut down the run pretty well, I believe a pass rush will make our defense dominating.
It would be either Pierre Paul or Calvin Johnson. However, this regime seems to not "put a premium on stud WR's". My guess is that a year or two with a receiving corps like the one we have and they will be singing a different tune. |
I like it. JPP was one of the guys I named and I'm glad to see another poster bring him up! For a minute I thought maybe I was crazy. I completely agree that our DBs look bad because they don't get a lot of help from the guys up front outside of Wake.
JPP is a beast, plain and simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WaterBear56 
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll take Gronkowski. Defensively we are sound and RB/OL don't need to be elite for an offense to be elite. Nowadays it's about the WR's and TE's but no one elite WR can create a SB winning team so I'll pass on the cap heavy CJ and take Gronkowski here who is making 1/3 of what CJ makes in the same amount of time. _________________
ADOPT A DOLPHIN: CAMERON WAKE
2012 STATISTICS: 53 TACK, 38 SOLO, 15 AST, 15 SACK, 3 FF, 1 PD, 3 STF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ProudDolphan47
 Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 5015 Location: Lancaster, PA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
JJ Watt has increased his sack totals in each of his three games...going from one, to two, to three. I'd say he can rush the passer just fine Merc  _________________ -Proud 2011 Inductee to FF's Miami Dolphins RoH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mercury22 

Joined: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 12329 Location: the 50 yard line
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ProudDolphan47 wrote: | JJ Watt has increased his sack totals in each of his three games...going from one, to two, to three. I'd say he can rush the passer just fine Merc  |
Sorry, I just re-read my post and I can totally see how it sounds like I am suggesting Watt isn't a pass rusher. No, I intended that to sound like either Pierre Paul or Watt were solid choices and represent an improvement in pass rush for our team. I would be beyond thrilled with either one. I prefer Pierre Paul, but only slightly. Watt is a bad dude, and he certainly has pass rush skills. Sorry for the confusion. _________________ "22 players are involved in every football play. To value precisely the activity of one of them, it is first necessary to account for the actions of the other 21" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cddolphin 
Joined: 23 Mar 2009 Posts: 4809 Location: Gainesville, FL
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
QB is too easy of an answer. The next most important position is the one responsible for getting after the QB and/or making the opposing offense one-dimensional.
I'll take Suh. He's very young, and better IMO than Allen (who's in his 30s) or Watt. JPP relies on his athleticism which means to me he won't be as dominant as long.
Odrick - Suh - Starks - Wake
A defensive line of dreams. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fishfan4life
Joined: 15 Mar 2012 Posts: 1127 Location: santa rosa california
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jason peirre paul on defense and calvin johnson on offense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maddogg
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 1119 Location: A Galaxy Far Far Away......
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well this is a toughie... but the person I would like to add is on no NFL roster,
Thats right I would add Chuck Norris because he could play both ways.
On offense he would catch every ball thrown to him and score every time.
On defense he would always sack the QB and never get flagged for roughing the QB because he is awesome and as we all know there is no flag for excessive awesomeness. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phinmun
Joined: 29 Dec 2007 Posts: 2231 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Maddogg wrote: | Well this is a toughie... but the person I would like to add is on no NFL roster,
Thats right I would add Chuck Norris because he could play both ways.
On offense he would catch every ball thrown to him and score every time.
On defense he would always sack the QB and never get flagged for roughing the QB because he is awesome and as we all know there is no flag for excessive awesomeness. |
Yes, but would you really get the feeling you beat anyone? I mean, no one would dare take the field to oppose us leaving fans the choice to tune into watch the commentators talk about what would've happened or simply watching the Jets.
No, the NFL would die in popularity leaving Chuck Norris jobless, but then he'd leave and the players would come back but then so would Chuck Norris....
...the cycle of the Norris. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skatewood2 
Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 5543 Location: Kent, WA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I see where SUG is coming from and somewhat agree with him. BUt I would not take O-Line unfortunately. I would love for it to be Gronkowski. I think the right TE on this roster would open up the passing game making life much easier for Tanny and better for Hartline/Bess.
Where was Armstron in the game today? I don't think he made a catch. _________________
NFL - Miami Dolphins
College - THE Ohio State University Buckeyes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carlos2104 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 1634 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I almost want to say Matt Bryant |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ojmcduff
Joined: 22 Mar 2009 Posts: 176 Location: ct
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Janakowski |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|