| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolni
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 2167
Location: Europe
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Dorsey plays the run really well as a 5tech, so I think he would play the run pretty well as a 3tech...
He didn't get the chance in the KC D to really rush the passer from the inside between C and G, where we could excell.
He would be a great and affordable addition IMO.
DirtyHarry:
Houston, Shaggy and Bryant are disciplined guys, so is Dorsey as far as gap controll, that's why I think that line would be good against the run.
285-300-300-275 not too small IMO
we tried the 305-315-315-275 in the past with bad result...not only the size matters...you remember terdell sands? 
_________________
WIN LOSE OR TIE...RAIDER FAN 'TIL I DIE!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darbsk
Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 626
Location: Wales, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rolni wrote: | Dorsey plays the run really well as a 5tech, so I think he would play the run pretty well as a 3tech...
He didn't get the chance in the KC D to really rush the passer from the inside between C and G, where we could excell.
He would be a great and affordable addition IMO.
DirtyHarry:
Houston, Shaggy and Bryant are disciplined guys, so is Dorsey as far as gap controll, that's why I think that line would be good against the run.
285-300-300-275 not too small IMO
we tried the 305-315-315-275 in the past with bad result...not only the size matters...you remember terdell sands? |
Should be above average against the run I would think, solid players and decent gap discipline provided. However, where is our pass rush going to come from?? I like Houston and Shaugnessy but they are too similar in regards to solid edge setters and decent run defenders who will occasionally pressure the QB.
I'd be ok with Seymour (if he restructures) and Bryant inside with a pass rushing RDE and Houston at LDE. Shaggy can rotate at both DE spots.
With that said, who do we think could make a difference in the 1st or 3rd rounds at RDE, Björn Werner maybe?? I'm open to suggestions for this scenario.........
_________________
“It may take us a short while, but we'll get that nastiness of the Raiders back.”
Mr. Al Davis RIP |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyHarry
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 1167
Location: Foster City,CA
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rolni wrote: | Dorsey plays the run really well as a 5tech, so I think he would play the run pretty well as a 3tech...
He didn't get the chance in the KC D to really rush the passer from the inside between C and G, where we could excell.
He would be a great and affordable addition IMO.
DirtyHarry:
Houston, Shaggy and Bryant are disciplined guys, so is Dorsey as far as gap controll, that's why I think that line would be good against the run.
285-300-300-275 not too small IMO
we tried the 305-315-315-275 in the past with bad result...not only the size matters...you remember terdell sands? |
I know what u mean but Terdell sands sucked lol. I would love a Sammie Lee Hill or a Pat Sims rotated in. And as for Desmond Bryant I still like him at LE in our base d.
_________________
| JonesDrew32 wrote: | 38-10 Chargers
This game should definitely bring some lulz from the Raiders side. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4190
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Chali21 wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | macklemore wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | Chali21 wrote: | | Nodisrespect wrote: |
Rey Maualuga
We could use all these guys and i want atlest one of them. |
Wait...Rey's a free agent? It's time to finally get him on the team. |
Why? What has he done in Cinci besides busting? |
He would be a much cheaper two down linebacker then McClain. |
If we're going to replace McClain, I want an upgrade. Not a player who leaves us with the same problems. |
It was a joke. I said it because of the legendary thread about drafting him. |
I see. Was this forum in love with him? Rey was one of the more overrated prospects of the past decade. Not surprised the Bengals took him lol
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24719
Location: Rochester, NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaidersAreOne
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 4759
Location: Canada, Where All We Do Is Play Hockey And Sleep In Igloos
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then.
_________________
First jersey purchased: Jamarcus Russell.
Second jersey purchased: Rolando McClain.
Next purchases: Every Chiefs, Chargers and Broncos player. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaidersAreOne
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 4759
Location: Canada, Where All We Do Is Play Hockey And Sleep In Igloos
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Who the hell are we gonna call up/sign? I just saw that McFadden and Goodson are both out. So we have Jones and Reece?
_________________
First jersey purchased: Jamarcus Russell.
Second jersey purchased: Rolando McClain.
Next purchases: Every Chiefs, Chargers and Broncos player. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24719
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay?
_________________
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | What do you season your meatballs and sausage with? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4190
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
55 pages?! Epic = that thread
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4190
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So what's the deal with our D heading into the future? Are we going to run a hybrid defense next season, make the full switch to the 3-4, or stay the course? It'd be nice to know before we start targeting defensive FA's.
Jason Tarver is a 3-4 coach right? I have to imagine Allen hired him to at least run a hybrid D.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dessie
Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 3845
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay? |
Was wondering myself about Bayarea07, when did he last post ?
Alex 93 doesn't post much either these days.
_________________
| bitty wrote: | I don't understand why everybody thinks Green Bay is the pinnacle of NFL franchises?
In my opinion they are a joke. In the last ten years there drafts sucked. |
#clueless |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaiderX
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 17122
Location: Crown Town, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay? |
He left with his buddy Chaz. 
_________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19067
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay? |
After his love affair with Gradkowski ended w/ egg on his face he never came back. I don't miss that Russell homer even remotely.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaiderX
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 17122
Location: Crown Town, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay? |
After his love affair with Gradkowski ended w/ egg on his face he never came back. I don't miss that Russell homer even remotely. |
Nope. He left after the season. Maybe it was because of Chaz. Gave him an "omelet face-mask."
_________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chali21
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 1709
Location: Cali
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | RaidersAreOne wrote: |
Props to deadstar saying Clay Mathews is the best player on that team way back then. |
Man I miss AD=0-16, that dude was the man. And what ever happened to Bay? |
After his love affair with Gradkowski ended w/ egg on his face he never came back. I don't miss that Russell homer even remotely. |
Hey! Some of us Russell homers have learned the error of our ways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
