| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66567
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| [UMN] wrote: | | what happened to making a building look like... a building? |
don't sweat it, that's what we'll get. Lucas Oil Field looks a lot like a warehouse.
but think of the sports arenas recently used in Olympic venues. that's what those drawings were more akin to. _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klomp 
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 3380 Location: The Home of Schwan's Ice Cream
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | | [UMN] wrote: | | what happened to making a building look like... a building? |
don't sweat it, that's what we'll get. Lucas Oil Field looks a lot like a warehouse.
but think of the sports arenas recently used in Olympic venues. that's what those drawings were more akin to. | so you're saying we'll put in a bid for the Olympics?! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66567
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Klomp wrote: | | so you're saying we'll put in a bid for the Olympics?! |
no, just that the unique and artistic styling you see for sports stadiums is the growing trend, because of the Olympics. but not really in the NFL. _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39439 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Cardinals and Cowboys stadiums look more like giant alien space stations to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingshomer
Joined: 01 Jan 2009 Posts: 2036
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | HKS submitted the second-lowest bid, at nearly $42 million, but the final price was negotiated down. The highest bid, $54 million, came from Kansas City-based Populous (formerly HOK), the designer of the Twins' Target Field, TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota and the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul. The lowest bid of $32 million came from Los Angeles-based AECOM, which designed CenturyLink Field, home of the Seattle Seahawks.
Along with HKS, Populous and Kansas City-based HNTB were called back for second interviews, according to the authority. AECOM and Philadelphia-based Ewing Cole were not.
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_21651983/vikings-stadium-architect-be-announced |
That top one looks amazing. I don't want another bland typical stadium, I want something that is out of the box and has state of the art amenities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AndyJ1134 
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 1210 Location: Winona State University
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
That second one screams "Football of the future."
Which gives me goosebumps for some reason  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CriminalMind 
Joined: 25 Aug 2011 Posts: 2960 Location: Toronto, CA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The 1st pic design is really nice
Now I dont think the actual will look like that, but I will prefer it to be different looking.
I want more then just a rectangular box, airport hanger, giant bowl, football shape with a bubble etc. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WareWolf94 
Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 5296
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I've been directed to here to describe Cowboys stadium. I'm sure most of you guys know the look and feel based on TV.
I will say that Jerry Jones had his hand so deep in the development of Cowboys Stadium it wasn't really up to the architects on the design. I'll be going to a game OCT 28 and I'll have an up close view of it.
I guess the budget would be the main factor and it looks likes, judging from the early designs they are staying away from alot of steel.
Steel is by far the most expensive item during production of the stadium. So you might see a visually stimulating stadium with alot less steel. Which is why you see alot of glass. _________________
Thanks to SHSTE
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=25584
When you're right, you're right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaBoys 
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 3020 Location: Lubbock Texas
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I was asked to comment on this thread. I'll oblige. I love the 'Jerry World' stadium because of it's sheer mass, and vastness. It is a true giant. The problem is that it is too large to be functional, unless we pack 100,000 people in it. Which the inevitable increase of ticket prices, when rebuilding your stadium, almost eliminates the chance of. You also have small stadiums like Seattle's that are much less physically imposing, but have a higher degree of functionality. That's the type of stadium you should hope for. A stadium that can be viciously loud with 50,000 people in it, because a loud stadium can indeed influence a game. When we pack 50,000 people in Cowboys stadium the sound is pathetic. The top three NFL stadiums in terms of capacity are NFC East teams. The Giants, the Cowboys, and the Redskins. The Eagles, who have the divisions smallest stadium at 69,144, arguably have the loudest stadium in the East. The Cowboys have the most magnificent IMO, but when you can help your teams performance with stadium design why wouldn't you? _________________
| Matts4313 wrote: | | I agree with daboys, some of you might be insane. |
| The_Slamman wrote: | | Daboys is right. |
| Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | BTW, DaBoys wins this thread. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klomp 
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 3380 Location: The Home of Schwan's Ice Cream
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaBoys wrote: | | You also have small stadiums like Seattle's that are much less physically imposing, but have a higher degree of functionality. That's the type of stadium you should hope for. A stadium that can be viciously loud with 50,000 people in it, because a loud stadium can indeed influence a game. When we pack 50,000 people in Cowboys stadium the sound is pathetic. |
I'm pretty sure that the footprint we are building on is small compared to places like Dallas, so I think there's a good chance that will work in our favor. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vikefan79 
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 25063 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingshomer wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | HKS submitted the second-lowest bid, at nearly $42 million, but the final price was negotiated down. The highest bid, $54 million, came from Kansas City-based Populous (formerly HOK), the designer of the Twins' Target Field, TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota and the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul. The lowest bid of $32 million came from Los Angeles-based AECOM, which designed CenturyLink Field, home of the Seattle Seahawks.
Along with HKS, Populous and Kansas City-based HNTB were called back for second interviews, according to the authority. AECOM and Philadelphia-based Ewing Cole were not.
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_21651983/vikings-stadium-architect-be-announced |
That top one looks amazing. I don't want another bland typical stadium, I want something that is out of the box and has state of the art amenities. |
If it doesn't look similar to Luca Oil, Ford Field, or Quest Field I'll be upset. No need to let some design student experiment on us. Go with what works and what we know looks good! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klomp 
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 3380 Location: The Home of Schwan's Ice Cream
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Vikefan79 wrote: |
If it doesn't look similar to Luca Oil, Ford Field, or Quest Field I'll be upset. No need to let some design student experiment on us. Go with what works and what we know looks good! |
What looks good? You might be the first person I've seen who says either Ford Field or Lucas Oil Stadium look good. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vikefan79 
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 25063 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Klomp wrote: | | Vikefan79 wrote: |
If it doesn't look similar to Luca Oil, Ford Field, or Quest Field I'll be upset. No need to let some design student experiment on us. Go with what works and what we know looks good! |
What looks good? You might be the first person I've seen who says either Ford Field or Lucas Oil Stadium look good. |
Those 2 stadiums from what I've read have received nothing but praise. They were talking about how great Lucas Oil stadium was during the Vikings game. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39439 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| My preferred style if Lucas Oil, so I hope they do something similar but unique to that one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
disaacs 
 Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 19963 Location: Brownbackistan
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I haven't seen anyone mention how the first picture looks like 5 Viking horns lined up next to each other (in addition to looking like ski/sledding slopes).
I'm all for making it a unique European-style stadium...maybe even Nordic?...just not like this.
 _________________
Thx to Uncle Buck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|