View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:56 pm Post subject: Local CBS station in Philly makes a blunder tonight |
|
|
|
The sports anchor looked in the camera and said
"If the Eagles win tomorrow, they will be 3-0 for the first time since 1974"
LOL
This statement was a major fail for 3 reasons
1. The Eagles were 3-0 in 2004
2. The Eagles were 3-0 in 1980
3. The Eagles were 2-1 in 1974
Somebody needs to be fired |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ninjapirate 
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 42661 Location: Vegas
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
cool thread bro, tell us more. _________________
RainbowCarebear wrote: | Anna Kendricks are always nice. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oland11 
Joined: 15 Jul 2011 Posts: 7939 Location: St. Louis - Temporarily
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Who are you? _________________
Chip Kelly on Sam Bradford: "We didnt bring in Sam to be a trade chip, Im the only Chip here"
vinniepaz wrote: | LOL roll is going off. I love you draft day |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kiltman 
 Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 17463 Location: Flipadelphia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I really hope he sees this thread and reevaluates himself as a person. Is it even worth it to get up in the morning Mr. Anchor Man?
NFL "experts" say things just as bad and worse all the time...I chose not to hound people about it...I might be weird though. _________________
Eagles Forum Hall of Famer | 2013 Gold Standard Baldy | 2015 Steegles Baldy | The Reigning ENBD Champion |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Kiltman wrote: | I really hope he sees this thread and reevaluates himself as a person. Is it even worth it to get up in the morning Mr. Anchor Man?
NFL "experts" say things just as bad and worse all the time...I chose not to hound people about it...I might be weird though. |
I;m sending my resume on monday morning do I can apply for a sports researcher position |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McNabbMcFadden 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 34640
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bednarik60 
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 37096 Location: Vancouver, Washington
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thread of the year.
 _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bednarik60 wrote: | Thread of the year.
 |
NEWS BLOOPER of the Decade |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McNabbMcFadden 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 34640
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
Um, because they are playing AGAINST the Cardinals.
It had been said on Sportscenter on Friday. Quit being ignant yo. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
Um, because they are playing AGAINST the Cardinals.
It had been said on Sportscenter on Friday. Quit being ignant yo. |
That stat would only be on ESPN not a Philadelphia newscast. Only a local Arizona Newscast because those viewers would be interested in the news..............NOT Philly viewers in the city of Philadelphia |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McNabbMcFadden 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 34640
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
Um, because they are playing AGAINST the Cardinals.
It had been said on Sportscenter on Friday. Quit being ignant yo. |
That stat would only be on ESPN not a Philadelphia newscast. Only a local Arizona Newscast because those viewers would be interested in the news..............NOT Philly viewers in the city of Philadelphia |
Believe what you want. You've got one thick skull dude. It is what it is. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"
http://www.yardbarker.com/all_sports/articles/the_arizona_cardinals_have_not_started_3_0_since_1974/11729515
They are playing against the Cardinals. They could say in a real broadcast "The Eagles are going up against the Cardinals who with a win would be 3-0 for the first time since 1974" I don't know what they actually said word for word, but this is what they meant. It's obvious, and if you can't see that, then you are blind.
Last edited by McNabbMcFadden on Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bednarik60 
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 37096 Location: Vancouver, Washington
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Some ones got that thick thick thick skull... ya dig? hahahaha must get it from his mama.. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NFLFan76
Joined: 15 May 2012 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
Um, because they are playing AGAINST the Cardinals.
It had been said on Sportscenter on Friday. Quit being ignant yo. |
That stat would only be on ESPN not a Philadelphia newscast. Only a local Arizona Newscast because those viewers would be interested in the news..............NOT Philly viewers in the city of Philadelphia |
Believe what you want. You've got one thick skull dude. It is what it is. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"
http://www.yardbarker.com/all_sports/articles/the_arizona_cardinals_have_not_started_3_0_since_1974/11729515
They are playing against the Cardinals. They could say in a real broadcast "The Eagles are going up against the Cardinals who with a win would be 3-0 for the first time since 1974" I don't know what they actually said word for word, but this is what they meant. It's obvious, and if you can't see that, then you are blind. |
The lady said.............."And now to sports, the eagles face the cardinals tomorrow and are trying to go 3-0 for the first time since 1974
Why would a Phillu sports anchor mention the cards that fast? She screwed up that's all. Some mistakes are unacceptable |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
McNabbMcFadden 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 Posts: 34640
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | NFLFan76 wrote: | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | They meant the Eagles opponent tomorrow, the Cards, would be 3-0 since the first time since 1974 |
NOPE, try again, this is a philadelphia newscast so why the hell would they be discussing the Cardinals
And EAGLES came out of her mouth not Cardinals. |
Um, because they are playing AGAINST the Cardinals.
It had been said on Sportscenter on Friday. Quit being ignant yo. |
That stat would only be on ESPN not a Philadelphia newscast. Only a local Arizona Newscast because those viewers would be interested in the news..............NOT Philly viewers in the city of Philadelphia |
Believe what you want. You've got one thick skull dude. It is what it is. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"
http://www.yardbarker.com/all_sports/articles/the_arizona_cardinals_have_not_started_3_0_since_1974/11729515
They are playing against the Cardinals. They could say in a real broadcast "The Eagles are going up against the Cardinals who with a win would be 3-0 for the first time since 1974" I don't know what they actually said word for word, but this is what they meant. It's obvious, and if you can't see that, then you are blind. |
The lady said.............."And now to sports, the eagles face the cardinals tomorrow and are trying to go 3-0 for the first time since 1974
Why would a Phillu sports anchor mention the cards that fast? She screwed up that's all. Some mistakes are unacceptable |
Yup fire her, do you have a job? I'm sure if you worked for a restaurant and got someone regular soda instead of Diet that they'd fire you on the spot. It's called a headline dude, trying to set the mood that these are two good teams going at it. Anchors always tries to make some pleasant remarks about the opposing team (especially if they aren't rivals). It's good publicity and is expected to be returned by the other teams market. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|