| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bobby2times
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Not so confident about this game. Which Mark Sanchez are we getting this week? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glenearl18
Joined: 12 Feb 2012 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bobby2times wrote: | | Not so confident about this game. Which Mark Sanchez are we getting this week? |
Both weeks have been the same Sanchez. If you replace him in the Pit game with Aaron Rodgers or Brady they wouldn't have done anything at all either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arch[STUD]ent
Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Posts: 119 Location: Somewhere New
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's going to be another long game if Revis isnt back. Kristian Dyer reported Revis practicing today but Im not sure if that means he is cleared to play Sunday? Having Revis will give our pass rush more time to pursue the QB. I think hitting Tannehill early and often and giving him very small windows to get the ball into is a huge recipe for success. It's imperative the Jets win Sunday. _________________ If you're caught on a golf course during a storm and are afraid of lightning, hold up a 1-iron...Not even God can hit a 1-iron. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ekill08x 
Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 7477 Location: Patchogue, New York
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bobby2times wrote: | | Not so confident about this game. Which Mark Sanchez are we getting this week? |
Regardless of what happened last week, thats the legitimate question that needs to be asked. Hes been Jekyll and Hyde for just about all his career. I'm really pulling for him this year but at some point were going to have to stop making excuses for him and just come to a conclusion on what he is. Is he a franchise caliber QB or is he a guy that is too inconsistant to be QB of even a top 15 offense? At the very least I'll take what Alex Smith has turned into because I think we can easily win that way, but we'd better start surrounding this kid with some weapons on offense and it has to start with a RB. _________________
Props to JMG on the sig as usual |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.Revis24
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 3231
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bobby2times wrote: | | Not so confident about this game. Which Mark Sanchez are we getting this week? |
Sanchez was not as bad as his numbers were vs the Steelers IMO. He was hurt from either WRs not getting open, or miscommunication (one play with Cumberland stuck out, Sanchez made the hot route on a blitz and Cumberland didn't even look back for the ball), or WRs dropping passes. He had a few bad throws (one real bad one which could have been a TD to Holmes that he overthrew), but for the most part was making good decisions , just wasn't helped out by teammates at all.
Sanchez also was under pressure, Lamar Woodley apparently had 7 QB pressures sunday, he won the match up vs Austin Howard, Sanchez was able to get away from pressure most of the day.
But basically, if WRs run the right routes, get open, and catch the ball. Sanchez will be fine this Sunday. _________________
Props to El Ramster on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.Revis24
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 3231
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Arch[STUD]ent wrote: | | It's going to be another long game if Revis isnt back. Kristian Dyer reported Revis practicing today but Im not sure if that means he is cleared to play Sunday? Having Revis will give our pass rush more time to pursue the QB. I think hitting Tannehill early and often and giving him very small windows to get the ball into is a huge recipe for success. It's imperative the Jets win Sunday. |
I don't think it means hes going to play yet, he still hasn't been cleared for contact. I don't care if its the Dolphins, we need Revis back. Same with Keller. _________________
Props to El Ramster on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18350
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| glenearl18 wrote: | | bobby2times wrote: | | Not so confident about this game. Which Mark Sanchez are we getting this week? |
Both weeks have been the same Sanchez. If you replace him in the Pit game with Aaron Rodgers or Brady they wouldn't have done anything at all either. |
That's a pretty big stretch. Brady or Rodgers would have hit Holmes in the end zone on that second drive.
I actually agree with Manish that that play could have changed the game for the Jets. _________________
| maes wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | I want strippers but the wife to be doesnt lol |
find a new wife imo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
green24 
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 26522 Location: #GenoSith
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JetFanSince85 wrote: | | One more thing, let Powell start and let Green be the change of pace pounder. The NFl is a two back league you will only add to yout team if you go two headed monster. |
I really want to see what Powell's got. Even if he's not starting, I want to see him take a good portion of the carries this weekend. _________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickyt31 
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 4729 Location: HeAtlanta,Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would like to see Powell get more carries as well. I want to see Joe run the ball too. He only has 2 carries for 15 yards. Its not like we have an elite running back that should get all the carries. _________________
Sleepers
Will Davis-Gerald Hodges -Escobar-Donald Russell-Da'rick Rogers-JJ Wilcox-D'mario Gunn- Latavius Murray-Ryan Griffin[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18350
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Jets cornerback Darrelle Revis has been cleared for contact and, barring a setback, he is expected to play Sunday at Miami. |
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/248812777324556288
Excellent news. Having Revis on the field dramatically changes the defense and team. _________________
| maes wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | I want strippers but the wife to be doesnt lol |
find a new wife imo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davey 
 Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 20701 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd like to see Joe McKnight get involved more with the conventional offense, definitely. Powell I think earned more opportunities to carry the ball as well.
I wonder what Keller's status is. May be best to keep him off the field until he's completely healthy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bleed-Green-87 
Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Posts: 870
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Reggie Bush is going to tear us apart, on the ground and in the passing game. Even if he does we still should have a shot in this one Tannehill is going to be overwhelmed if we can get pressure. _________________
Thanks Delphi^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rockice_8
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 Posts: 1483 Location: Unknown
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Davey wrote: | I'd like to see Joe McKnight get involved more with the conventional offense, definitely. Powell I think earned more opportunities to carry the ball as well.
I wonder what Keller's status is. May be best to keep him off the field until he's completely healthy. |
It looks like Keller will play on Sunday too along with Revis but I doubt he's 100% yet. I hope him playing doesn't drag this out even more throughout the year. We shouldn't need Keller to win this one so lets hope they are all making the right decision.
And I agree with ekill08x about the RB we are in desperate need of a stud back there.
We came up big in game 1 which was a must win and now so is this one. Let's hope the pressure doesn't get to them cause the Fins are always playing the Jets tough and this game (no matter how good each team is) is always tough.
20-13 Jets in a close one _________________
Receiving
Rec - 56, Yds - 827, Avg - 14.8, Lng - 66, TD - 2
Props to Jamison on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sapo28 
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 632
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Would it be out of the question to man Revis up on Bush for the game? He's probably there biggest threat on offense running and receiving. Not to mention Cromartie can take on Bess and Wilson can take their #2 whom ever that is. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RDawg10 
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
in that second picture with Sparano and Rex, thats not Mangold thats Brett Roy behind them.
So that would be Brett Roy with an awkward stare _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|