| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 27305
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sciz
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 12867
Location: Iowa
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Huh. I don't blame Belichick for the Salas move, but McDaniels. How do you coach a guy for a year and think he's worth trading for, but then cut him before he does anything?
_________________
Shut up, NBT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16285
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sciz wrote: | | Huh. I don't blame Belichick for the Salas move, but McDaniels. How do you coach a guy for a year and think he's worth trading for, but then cut him before he does anything? |
They gave up a late round 2015 pick for a few weeks to see if Salas could pick up the scheme or if they could catch lightning in a bottle.
An absolutely tiny risk for a potential decent payoff.
As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Richter
Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Posts: 9498
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sciz
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 12867
Location: Iowa
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
Heck, or as early as next week, when they're allowed to cut Hooasdppaosidjoi
_________________
Shut up, NBT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16285
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
I'm guessing Hoomanawanui is gone next week - they might try to get him on the PS (if he goes unclaimed off waivers). It will be interesting to see what the corresponding move will be. The obvious places for an addition would be RB/FB or a project WR like Salas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40910
Location: Probably doing something self-destructive
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
I'm guessing Hoomanawanui is gone next week - they might try to get him on the PS (if he goes unclaimed off waivers). It will be interesting to see what the corresponding move will be. The obvious places for an addition would be RB/FB or a project WR like Salas. |
Hoomazoomazooma isn't PS eligible.
_________________
GTFO Tebow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16285
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
I'm guessing Hoomanawanui is gone next week - they might try to get him on the PS (if he goes unclaimed off waivers). It will be interesting to see what the corresponding move will be. The obvious places for an addition would be RB/FB or a project WR like Salas. |
Hoomazoomazooma isn't PS eligible. |
Considering he was signed off the Redskins practice squad, I'd say he is. As far as I know, once the 3 week period has passed, there is nothing preventing the Pats from cutting and signing Hoomanawanui to the practice squad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40910
Location: Probably doing something self-destructive
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
I'm guessing Hoomanawanui is gone next week - they might try to get him on the PS (if he goes unclaimed off waivers). It will be interesting to see what the corresponding move will be. The obvious places for an addition would be RB/FB or a project WR like Salas. |
Hoomazoomazooma isn't PS eligible. |
Considering he was signed off the Redskins practice squad, I'd say he is. As far as I know, once the 3 week period has passed, there is nothing preventing the Pats from cutting and signing Hoomanawanui to the practice squad. |
Have the PS rules changed since last year? He's credited with 19 game appearances.
_________________
GTFO Tebow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sciz
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 12867
Location: Iowa
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | Have the PS rules changed since last year? He's credited with 19 game appearances. |
Never more than 8 in a season, so he's fine.
_________________
Shut up, NBT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dhunt2402
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 16733
Location: The District
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good riddance Lex Hilliard.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40910
Location: Probably doing something self-destructive
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sciz wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | Have the PS rules changed since last year? He's credited with 19 game appearances. |
Never more than 8 in a season, so he's fine. |
Huh. Guess I was a bit confused on that one.
_________________
GTFO Tebow |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patsfan25
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 2959
Location: CenCal
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Richter wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | As it is, had Hernandez not gotten hurt, I'd bet that Salas would still be around. Can't have a gameday inactive project WR with Hernandez out. |
Wouldn't surprise me to see Salas brought back if Hernandez can get back on the field after the bye and they cut one of the tight ends. |
I'm guessing Hoomanawanui is gone next week - they might try to get him on the PS (if he goes unclaimed off waivers). It will be interesting to see what the corresponding move will be. The obvious places for an addition would be RB/FB or a project WR like Salas. |
You're doing it wrong....
_________________
| Ring Worm Sherm wrote: | | You're an complete idiot |
Aite,
Peace. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16285
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
