| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sandybaby716
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 3527
Location: Rhode Island
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:05 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Tooki wrote: | | I expect Randall Cobb to be your leading receiver. Although, Jordy Nelson COULD have a decent day against Brandon Browner. How is he against the press? |
He's probably the best one our team with that. But I agree that Cobb will be our best game plan. We run the offense through him this week and we'll have a pretty good shot at some lengthy drives.
And for everyone else...saying "All we have to do is stop Aaron Rodgers" is easy. Actually doing it has driven many a DC mad.
Not saying it can't happen. It's just not that simple.
_________________
| wgbeethree wrote: | | In all fairness it is kind of rude to just lay injured at their feet while the Lions defensive players are trying to hold a completely unrelated dance party. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JOEJOE
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Posts: 695
Location: 'DrunkMode' in Playersville
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
fun fact I found on Seahwks.com
| Quote: | STAT DU JOUR
Guess who has the best winning percentage in the history of “Monday Night Football”? The Seahawks, whose 17-8 record makes for a winning percentage of .680.
Here are the best winning percentages on MNF:
Team Wins Losses Pct.
Seahawks 17 - 8 .680
Steelers 39 - 23 .629
49ers 41 - 25 .621
Colts 20 - 13 .606
Giants 38 - 25 .602 |
http://blog.seahawks.com/2012/09/18/tuesday-in-hawkville-omiyale-to-the-rescue/
_________________
Adopt-a-Hawk
Bruce Irvin= Sacks: 4-1/2, Tackles: 5, FF: 1
Golden Tate= Rec: 10, Yds: 144, Avg: 14.4, TD: 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9361
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tooki wrote: | | I expect Randall Cobb to be your leading receiver. Although, Jordy Nelson COULD have a decent day against Brandon Browner. How is he against the press? |
You are going to shutdown Jordy, Jennings, and Finley?  I doubt it. Two of top three will probably have around 100 yards IMO. Nelson is pretty good against press, he knows how to use his body better than any WR in the NFL IMO. That's his best attribute
_________________
| jfinley88 wrote: | | Woke up in the shower wearing a frog costume with the nipples cut out and my face painted like a tiger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sacks98
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 3520
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Isn't Finley really streaky and not very reliable? I remember having him last year in fantasy and he would have a bunch of games where he would do basically nothing and then he would have weeks where he would put up a bunch of points. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JOEJOE
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Posts: 695
Location: 'DrunkMode' in Playersville
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sandybaby716 wrote: |
And for everyone else...saying "All we have to do is stop Aaron Rodgers" is easy. Actually doing it has driven many a DC mad.
Not saying it can't happen. It's just not that simple. |
Never said it was simple, just said that's all we have to do!, Your running game is weak... and your defense has given up an avg. of 140yds rushing per game..
_________________
Adopt-a-Hawk
Bruce Irvin= Sacks: 4-1/2, Tackles: 5, FF: 1
Golden Tate= Rec: 10, Yds: 144, Avg: 14.4, TD: 3
Last edited by JOEJOE on Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:17 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Packer70
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 2616
Location: Vancouver
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Will be heading down to this game with 3 friends who are Seahawk fans. I'm hoping for a good game but I'd enjoy it more if we came out on top  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9361
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sacks98 wrote: | | Isn't Finley really streaky and not very reliable? |
Oh God yes. Half of the fan base wants to trade or cut him already
_________________
| jfinley88 wrote: | | Woke up in the shower wearing a frog costume with the nipples cut out and my face painted like a tiger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tooki
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 9694
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | Tooki wrote: | | I expect Randall Cobb to be your leading receiver. Although, Jordy Nelson COULD have a decent day against Brandon Browner. How is he against the press? |
You are going to shutdown Jordy, Jennings, and Finley? I doubt it. Two of top three will probably have around 100 yards IMO. Nelson is pretty good against press, he knows how to use his body better than any WR in the NFL IMO. That's his best attribute |
Richard Sherman has been boss this season. He shut down Larry Fitz and Dez Bryant when he was covering them. I don't expect a big game out of Greg Jennings or whoever is playing against him.
Kam Chancellor will cover Finley. He was a rookie when we last played in the pre-season. He is great against the athletic TE's, because he as LB size and DB speed. I wanna hope that he can take abuse, because Kam punishes whoever he covers.
I'm unsure about Brandon Browner though. He can get beaten on double moves (he got beat by Miles Austin last week), but he is also a very very physical guy. He won't be able to make any jump balls, that's for sure.
It comes down to Randall Cobb. Our weakness is covering the slot receiver. Cobb looks like a quality slot guy, and I expect him to be key on 3rd downs.
_________________
| sp6488 wrote: | | If the Chiefs finish ahead of the Ravens in the standings I will eat a printed copy of the standings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll just call it now, Finley has a huge game. The team used KJ to cover Witten and he could barely do that. Finley is way more of an athlete and we always struggle against the TE position. He leads the Packers in offense on Monday.
_________________
 '
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll also call this. Golden Tate has his best game in his career. An absolute coming out party as the Packers focus on Lynch and Rice. He'll likely be guarded by Bush, who is a pretty poor coverage corner. He's the type of guy that can't cover Tate. We saw last week that Wilson looked for him a lot. Had he led Tate on that one deep pass, Golden would've had a career day.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green90
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 652
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | I'll also call this. Golden Tate has his best game in his career. An absolute coming out party as the Packers focus on Lynch and Rice. He'll likely be guarded by Bush, who is a pretty poor coverage corner. He's the type of guy that can't cover Tate. We saw last week that Wilson looked for him a lot. Had he led Tate on that one deep pass, Golden would've had a career day. |
I'd actually expect him to be covered by Shields or even House if he plays this week. Bush started week one, but was pretty much benched week 2. Shields definitely has the speed to cover Tate, but is not overly physical.
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | I also have a bitchin' camero |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Green90 wrote: | | SaveourSonics wrote: | | I'll also call this. Golden Tate has his best game in his career. An absolute coming out party as the Packers focus on Lynch and Rice. He'll likely be guarded by Bush, who is a pretty poor coverage corner. He's the type of guy that can't cover Tate. We saw last week that Wilson looked for him a lot. Had he led Tate on that one deep pass, Golden would've had a career day. |
I'd actually expect him to be covered by Shields or even House if he plays this week. Bush started week one, but was pretty much benched week 2. Shields definitely has the speed to cover Tate, but is not overly physical. |
Does he have the athleticism to cover Tate? Because he's shifty and has crazy ups. I just figured it'd be Bush since we're a more run-oriented team and he's the better run defender.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tooki
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 9694
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Green90 wrote: | | SaveourSonics wrote: | | I'll also call this. Golden Tate has his best game in his career. An absolute coming out party as the Packers focus on Lynch and Rice. He'll likely be guarded by Bush, who is a pretty poor coverage corner. He's the type of guy that can't cover Tate. We saw last week that Wilson looked for him a lot. Had he led Tate on that one deep pass, Golden would've had a career day. |
I'd actually expect him to be covered by Shields or even House if he plays this week. Bush started week one, but was pretty much benched week 2. Shields definitely has the speed to cover Tate, but is not overly physical. |
Does he have the athleticism to cover Tate? Because he's shifty and has crazy ups. I just figured it'd be Bush since we're a more run-oriented team and he's the better run defender. |
On that note, I hope that Pete sets some runs towards him. Golden is a good blocker for his size.
_________________
| sp6488 wrote: | | If the Chiefs finish ahead of the Ravens in the standings I will eat a printed copy of the standings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
*SIGN-UP HERE FOR THE 1ST SEAHAWKS GAMEDAY CHALLENGE*
We're going to start an inter-forum challenge based off of statistics for the game. It'll likely be a different challenge each week, but for this week I was thinking of having everyone post who they believe is going to be the best offensive player of the day, and post your prediction of their stats, and the best defensive players of the day, and post your prediction of his stats. And try to post your reasoning.
Example:
| Quote: | Offensive: Russell Wilson
21/29 72% Completion
234 Passing Yards
37 Rushing Yards
2 Total TDs
Defensive: Kam Chancellor
8 Tackles
2 PDs
1 INT
1 FF |
^ And those are my actual predictions ^
I think Russell has his best game yet as the Packers disrespect the passing game.
Also think Kam has another huge game on primetime and shows the world he's now the best SS in the NFL.
---------------------------------
Anyways, as soon as you post your predictions I'll add your name to the sign-up list! Nothing else needed. I'll keep track of points each week. If you guess the players stats close enough and he IS the best player on his side of the ball, you get 3 points. If you guess the stats close but he's not the player of the game on that side of the ball, you get 1 point.
Let me know if you guys have any other suggestions. I'm just kinda winging it.
Sign-Ups
1. SaveourSonics
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tooki wrote: | | SaveourSonics wrote: | | Green90 wrote: | | SaveourSonics wrote: | | I'll also call this. Golden Tate has his best game in his career. An absolute coming out party as the Packers focus on Lynch and Rice. He'll likely be guarded by Bush, who is a pretty poor coverage corner. He's the type of guy that can't cover Tate. We saw last week that Wilson looked for him a lot. Had he led Tate on that one deep pass, Golden would've had a career day. |
I'd actually expect him to be covered by Shields or even House if he plays this week. Bush started week one, but was pretty much benched week 2. Shields definitely has the speed to cover Tate, but is not overly physical. |
Does he have the athleticism to cover Tate? Because he's shifty and has crazy ups. I just figured it'd be Bush since we're a more run-oriented team and he's the better run defender. |
On that note, I hope that Pete sets some runs towards him. Golden is a good blocker for his size. |
Yea, I hope we use Braylon more too. He was invisible last week.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
