| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24624
Location: Rochester, NY
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:18 pm Post subject: Good, Bad, Ugly: Week 2 |
 |
|
|
Good:
- Palmer had a good game
- Defense in the 1st half (generally speaking)
- No blocked punts
- Goodson
- Myers
Bad:
- More injuries
- We got away from blitzing
Ugly:
_________________
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | What do you season your meatballs and sausage with? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
bad: our longest run today was a 7 yard Palmer scramble
ugly: our running game. 2.2 ypc for McFadden smh
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raider87
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 980
Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good:
-Palmer looked good overall
-Shaughnessy played well made some plays
-Not many penalties
Bad:
-Tackling was terrible all around
-Secondary looked awful
-DMC played bad
-Offensive line didn't play very well
-RedZone offensive yet again looked horrible
Ugly:
-Running game
-Knapp (goes without saying)
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2911
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.
Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burgesskills
Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 933
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Palmer had a good game? You guys are are clueless.
His stats looked decent at the end of the day because we got crushed and threw the ball 50 times. He completed less than 50% of his balls. He over threw and under three receivers all game.
The interception was bound to come when he was forced to throw so ofte,n but there are times he doesn't look like a vet, he makes mistakes some young QB's make and then other times he threw the ball with zip on the mark....no consistency.
The bad: We are 0-2
Ugly: We got crushed by the Miami Dolphins including Reggie Bush bashing our so called improved defense.
Good: No major injuries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dessie
Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 3844
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:37 pm Post subject: Re: Good, Bad, Ugly: Week 2 |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | Good:
- Palmer had a good game
- Defense in the 1st half (generally speaking)
- No blocked punts
- Goodson
- Myers
Bad:
- More injuries
- We got away from blitzing
Ugly:
|
Agree with all of this but would add Cb's to the bad list. Lee and Hanson were really poor.
The first Bush TD was the changing point of the game, bad tackling.
_________________
| bitty wrote: | I don't understand why everybody thinks Green Bay is the pinnacle of NFL franchises?
In my opinion they are a joke. In the last ten years there drafts sucked. |
#clueless |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaiderX
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 17111
Location: Crown Town, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good
Palmer throwing well on the run surprisingly
OLine allowed very little pressure
Defense pressuring Tannehill
Adams with a nice punt return
Goodson run
Bad
Tackling on 1st Bush TD run
Branch not sealing the edge on 2nd Bush TD
Cornerbacks are AWFUL.
OLine and protection in 2nd half. No help.
Palmer missing his receivers under no pressure at times
We go from passing to DMC 13 times to 2-3 times.
Penalties leading to bad starting field position.
Ugly
Entire 2nd half.
1-12 on 3rd down.
_________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lilcrazycat1
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 899
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
the good
beautiful weather
bud light platinum is awesome
the bad
my buffalo wings were cold and soggy
my girlfriend knocked over 1 of my beers
the ugly
the entire raiders roster today |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jamethus92
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4494
Location: Colorado Springs
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good:
- Palmer did okay, smart decisions
- Shaughnessy/Wheeler were good rushing the passer
- Moore looks to be getting back in form
Bad:
- McFadden and the running game were awful
- Lost Barnes and Branch to injury, I think
Ugly:
- Greg Knapp and his poor playcalling
- Secondary play in general, lack of discipline when Tannehill got out of the pocket
- Poor tackling
_________________
Kiltman on the new sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrashMan510
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 2709
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good
Palmer was good for the most part. Made some bad throws and made some great throws.
Shaughnessy- Beast
Spencer- Another good game for him, too bad everyone back there was bad
Goodson
Bad
STeams- Miami kicked our [inappropriate/removed] on st's, plain and simple.
Field Position- Our offense started drives inside the 20 the whole game
DHB- Where the F where you??? #1 wr my [inappropriate/removed]
Run D- pathetic
DB's- their wr did the same route on 3rd down the whole game and we coulden't do ish
3rd down- awful on both sides of the ball
o-line- trash in run blocking
mcfadden dropped passes
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoomWaffle
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 4578
Location: AZ
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I understand we can't just give the ball to McFadden every play, but why Knapp doesn't call more plays to get him the ball in what was a close game for quite a while is a mystery to me. I understand our line wasn't blocking well but damn, Knapp has one of the most dangerous RBs in the league at his disposal and he can't find ways to get him involved? Thats the mark of a poor OC.
_________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good - Nothing
Bad - Everything
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
silver_surfer
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good
Phillip Adams seems like a leget return guy
Mike Goodsen- showed he belongs
Meyes and Ausberry- made some playes
Richard Gordan- is a stud special teamer
Willie Smith- came in for Barnes and was not mention, which a good thing
Shaungessy had his moments!
Bad-
lack of a running game
Carson Palmer- it's so easy to stop us.. Just blitz Palmer, and you force us to punt
defense as a unit- played tired |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raider87
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 980
Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nodisrespect wrote: | I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.
Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them. |
With lack of any running game what so ever and constant pressure I think Palmer played rather well and remember a lot of his passes were pretty much smart throw aways. Do I think he played flawlessly, not at all he still has to improve his accuracy, but I don't think his play is the reason we got creamed.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7237
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raider87 wrote: | | Nodisrespect wrote: | I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.
Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them. |
With lack of any running game what so ever and constant pressure I think Palmer played rather well and remember a lot of his passes were pretty much smart throw aways. Do I think he played flawlessly, not at all he still has to improve his accuracy, but I don't think his play is the reason we got creamed. |
This seems to be escaping people. Good remark.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
