Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Good, Bad, Ugly: Week 2
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Silver&Black88


Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 33652
Location: Boston, MA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:18 pm    Post subject: Good, Bad, Ugly: Week 2 Reply with quote

Good:
- Palmer had a good game
- Defense in the 1st half (generally speaking)
- No blocked punts
- Goodson
- Myers

Bad:
- More injuries
- We got away from blitzing

Ugly:

_________________

Professor Oak wrote:
Don't listen to the naysayers, S&B88.

SoS is in fact French. I've frenched his toast a couple of times. I think I would know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raiiiiidersssss


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 5217
Location: The Black Hole
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bad: our longest run today was a 7 yard Palmer scramble

ugly: our running game. 2.2 ypc for McFadden smh
_________________
MACKiavelli
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raider87


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1027
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good:
-Palmer looked good overall
-Shaughnessy played well made some plays
-Not many penalties

Bad:
-Tackling was terrible all around
-Secondary looked awful
-DMC played bad
-Offensive line didn't play very well
-RedZone offensive yet again looked horrible

Ugly:
-Running game
-Knapp (goes without saying)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Nodisrespect


Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 3971
Location: in the present
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.

Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Burgesskills


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1114
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Palmer had a good game? You guys are are clueless.

His stats looked decent at the end of the day because we got crushed and threw the ball 50 times. He completed less than 50% of his balls. He over threw and under three receivers all game.

The interception was bound to come when he was forced to throw so ofte,n but there are times he doesn't look like a vet, he makes mistakes some young QB's make and then other times he threw the ball with zip on the mark....no consistency.

The bad: We are 0-2
Ugly: We got crushed by the Miami Dolphins including Reggie Bush bashing our so called improved defense.

Good: No major injuries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dessie


Joined: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 4669
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Good, Bad, Ugly: Week 2 Reply with quote

Silver&Black88 wrote:
Good:
- Palmer had a good game
- Defense in the 1st half (generally speaking)
- No blocked punts
- Goodson
- Myers

Bad:
- More injuries
- We got away from blitzing

Ugly:


Agree with all of this but would add Cb's to the bad list. Lee and Hanson were really poor.

The first Bush TD was the changing point of the game, bad tackling.
_________________
bitty wrote:
I don't understand why everybody thinks Green Bay is the pinnacle of NFL franchises?
In my opinion they are a joke. In the last ten years there drafts sucked.
#clueless
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaiderX


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 20596
Location: Crown Town, CA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good
Palmer throwing well on the run surprisingly
OLine allowed very little pressure
Defense pressuring Tannehill
Adams with a nice punt return
Goodson run

Bad
Tackling on 1st Bush TD run
Branch not sealing the edge on 2nd Bush TD
Cornerbacks are AWFUL.
OLine and protection in 2nd half. No help.
Palmer missing his receivers under no pressure at times
We go from passing to DMC 13 times to 2-3 times.
Penalties leading to bad starting field position.


Ugly
Entire 2nd half.
1-12 on 3rd down.
_________________

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
lilcrazycat1


Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 930
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the good
beautiful weather
bud light platinum is awesome

the bad
my buffalo wings were cold and soggy
my girlfriend knocked over 1 of my beers

the ugly
the entire raiders roster today
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jamethus92


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4986
Location: Colorado Springs
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good:
- Palmer did okay, smart decisions
- Shaughnessy/Wheeler were good rushing the passer
- Moore looks to be getting back in form

Bad:
- McFadden and the running game were awful
- Lost Barnes and Branch to injury, I think

Ugly:
- Greg Knapp and his poor playcalling
- Secondary play in general, lack of discipline when Tannehill got out of the pocket
- Poor tackling
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CrashMan510


Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 4585
Location: Bay Area
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good

Palmer was good for the most part. Made some bad throws and made some great throws.

Shaughnessy- Beast

Spencer- Another good game for him, too bad everyone back there was bad

Goodson

Bad

STeams- Miami kicked our [inappropriate/removed] on st's, plain and simple.

Field Position- Our offense started drives inside the 20 the whole game

DHB- Where the F where you??? #1 wr my [inappropriate/removed]

Run D- pathetic

DB's- their wr did the same route on 3rd down the whole game and we coulden't do ish

3rd down- awful on both sides of the ball

o-line- trash in run blocking

mcfadden dropped passes
_________________


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eSN8Cwit_s
fuarge
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZoomWaffle


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5370
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand we can't just give the ball to McFadden every play, but why Knapp doesn't call more plays to get him the ball in what was a close game for quite a while is a mystery to me. I understand our line wasn't blocking well but damn, Knapp has one of the most dangerous RBs in the league at his disposal and he can't find ways to get him involved? Thats the mark of a poor OC.
_________________


Silver&Black88 on the sig

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ch8878


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good - Nothing
Bad - Everything

Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
silver_surfer


Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 265
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good
Phillip Adams seems like a leget return guy
Mike Goodsen- showed he belongs
Meyes and Ausberry- made some playes
Richard Gordan- is a stud special teamer
Willie Smith- came in for Barnes and was not mention, which a good thing
Shaungessy had his moments!

Bad-
lack of a running game
Carson Palmer- it's so easy to stop us.. Just blitz Palmer, and you force us to punt
defense as a unit- played tired
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raider87


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1027
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nodisrespect wrote:
I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.

Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them.


With lack of any running game what so ever and constant pressure I think Palmer played rather well and remember a lot of his passes were pretty much smart throw aways. Do I think he played flawlessly, not at all he still has to improve his accuracy, but I don't think his play is the reason we got creamed.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 12196
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raider87 wrote:
Nodisrespect wrote:
I disagree that Palmer was good, 24/48 373 is not good.This offense is about efficiency and Palmer was inaccurate today, Also the team was 1/12 on 3rd downs and there were multiple receivers running open on those third downs from my view.

Apparently teams have sold out on McFadden and they are testing Palmer so far it's working for them.


With lack of any running game what so ever and constant pressure I think Palmer played rather well and remember a lot of his passes were pretty much smart throw aways. Do I think he played flawlessly, not at all he still has to improve his accuracy, but I don't think his play is the reason we got creamed.


This seems to be escaping people. Good remark.
_________________


PM sig requests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group