| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 27339
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PackAtBroncos07
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3034
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I got a feeling we're going to be winning a lot of awards every week.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cutler06
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 9622
Location: Westminster
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well deserved !!
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Raiders have always been and will always be the outcasts of the nfl. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Russell2Bailey
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 12665
Location: Where I will, I'll roam.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
8 tackles, 5 PBU, and game sealing pick 6? I'd hope so.
_________________
 | Reggie Nelson#1 wrote: | | Radio-"Peyton give the ball to Ball. Ball drops the ball & Ball scoops it up! He's going downfield, TOUCHDOWN! Ball pats him on the back for when he lost the ball." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elliot878
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9568
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Porter was very imressive. He was up to the task of being Champs wingman. Seemed like he disrupted everything that came his way. Well deserved.
_________________
^Jamison. ^!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
M-High Marauder
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I was reading an article on DenverPost.com about Porter, and I was surprised to read that he is only on a one year contract. What do you think the chances are that the Broncos try and lock him up for longer? He is only 26 years old. I thought for sure he was 30-31.
Link to Post article:
Denver Post
_________________
Denver Broncos - Detroit Tigers - Michigan Wolverines |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JRebar913
Joined: 11 Mar 2012
Posts: 989
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| M-High Marauder wrote: | I was reading an article on DenverPost.com about Porter, and I was surprised to read that he is only on a one year contract. What do you think the chances are that the Broncos try and lock him up for longer? He is only 26 years old. I thought for sure he was 30-31.
Link to Post article:
Denver Post |
ive read that he has injury problems and they probably werent sure if he was going to be one of the saints players that would be part of the bounty suspensions. trust me if he proves he can be healthy he wont be leaving denver. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elliot878
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9568
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JRebar913 wrote: | | M-High Marauder wrote: | I was reading an article on DenverPost.com about Porter, and I was surprised to read that he is only on a one year contract. What do you think the chances are that the Broncos try and lock him up for longer? He is only 26 years old. I thought for sure he was 30-31.
Link to Post article:
Denver Post |
ive read that he has injury problems and they probably werent sure if he was going to be one of the saints players that would be part of the bounty suspensions. trust me if he proves he can be healthy he wont be leaving denver. |
Would have thought the same about Bunkley last year. I doubt they'll talk contract during the season, but he's a guy we cant let walk.
_________________
^Jamison. ^!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lomaxgr
Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 19850
Location: Manchester, England
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think he got a pretty healthy 1 year "prove it" deal. If he stays healthy and plays like he did in Week 1 then we are going to pay the price for not giving him a multi year deal in the offseason. Not saying we were wrong to give him a 1 year deal, but it goes to show that sometimes not signing a long term deal can benefit the player too.
_________________
20 TIMES, 20 TIMES MAN UNITTTTTEEDDD
From the banks of the River Irwell, to the shores of Sicily |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
broncos67
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 18374
Location: Capitol Cit-ay
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| elliot878 wrote: | | JRebar913 wrote: | | M-High Marauder wrote: | I was reading an article on DenverPost.com about Porter, and I was surprised to read that he is only on a one year contract. What do you think the chances are that the Broncos try and lock him up for longer? He is only 26 years old. I thought for sure he was 30-31.
Link to Post article:
Denver Post |
ive read that he has injury problems and they probably werent sure if he was going to be one of the saints players that would be part of the bounty suspensions. trust me if he proves he can be healthy he wont be leaving denver. |
Would have thought the same about Bunkley last year. I doubt they'll talk contract during the season, but he's a guy we cant let walk. |
Honestly, I didn't think we would resign Bunkley to big numbers regardless. It's obvious that through the years, Denver has never viewed the DT position as one of utmost importance. Elway places a premium on CBs, so let's see how Porter plays through, say, Week 8 and then I think we'll have a gauge as to whether we lock him up long term.
_________________
Thanks, Tzimisce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JerseysFinest27
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 6112
Location: New Jersey... Props to inDENguise on the sig
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| broncos67 wrote: | | elliot878 wrote: | | JRebar913 wrote: | | M-High Marauder wrote: | I was reading an article on DenverPost.com about Porter, and I was surprised to read that he is only on a one year contract. What do you think the chances are that the Broncos try and lock him up for longer? He is only 26 years old. I thought for sure he was 30-31.
Link to Post article:
Denver Post |
ive read that he has injury problems and they probably werent sure if he was going to be one of the saints players that would be part of the bounty suspensions. trust me if he proves he can be healthy he wont be leaving denver. |
Would have thought the same about Bunkley last year. I doubt they'll talk contract during the season, but he's a guy we cant let walk. |
Honestly, I didn't think we would resign Bunkley to big numbers regardless. It's obvious that through the years, Denver has never viewed the DT position as one of utmost importance. Elway places a premium on CBs, so let's see how Porter plays through, say, Week 8 and then I think we'll have a gauge as to whether we lock him up long term. |
Big Money? You serious?
The same staff that signed Ty Warren to $4M a year didnt sign Broderick Bunkley to $5M a year.
Now if youre telling me Broderick Bunkley isnt worth the same money as Ty Warren then we have a problem. That was a very stupid decision to not resign Bunkley to the 5/$25M. He was worth it for sure.
_________________
Stop slobbering over Lance Ball. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AntiSuperstar
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 4341
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JerseysFinest27 wrote: | The same staff that signed Ty Warren to $4M a year didnt sign Broderick Bunkley to $5M a year.
Now if youre telling me Broderick Bunkley isnt worth the same money as Ty Warren then we have a problem. That was a very stupid decision to not resign Bunkley to the 5/$25M. He was worth it for sure. |
The thing is I actually think the staff saw Warren as an everydown Tackle and Bunkley as just a pure run defender. So because of that they probably reasoned they made the right move. Now I can accept that Bunkley wasn't worth re-signing, but never will I accept that the Ty Warren addition was a good one even in theory.
Maybe we can get Terrance Knighton one day since the Jaguars don't seem to value him.
_________________
Stop slobbering over Brian Dawkins |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
