| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Deets
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 12806
Location: Red Sox Nation
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Can't we just agree that neither team has a receiving corp in the top 20 for the league? Because there are definitely 20 teams whos receivers I would take over Miami and Oakland's. Its kind of like you guys are arguing about who's turd is a more lovely shade of brown.
_________________
FF Member #67 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheKillerNacho
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 13318
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Deets wrote: | | Can't we just agree that neither team has a receiving corp in the top 20 for the league? Because there are definitely 20 teams whos receivers I would take over Miami and Oakland's. Its kind of like you guys are arguing about who's turd is a more lovely shade of brown. |
Honestly, both teams have bottom 5 receiving corp.
_________________
With much cheese,
Nacho Simulation Football League |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tacos
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 1296
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Deets wrote: | | Can't we just agree that neither team has a receiving corp in the top 20 for the league? Because there are definitely 20 teams whos receivers I would take over Miami and Oakland's. Its kind of like you guys are arguing about who's turd is a more lovely shade of brown. |
We're both better off than the Browns and Rams, we have that.
Something tells me this will be a defensive game.
Should go better for us than last year, though. That was quite the embarrassment.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaiderX
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 23354
Location: Crown Town, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ovaw8lover wrote: | | The thing I do not understand about the Raiders defense is they have the talent to be great. It puzzles me they are not better. I think Miami is still trying to find their identity. I think the defense will keep Miami into the game but Tanney will turn the ball over at least twice, therefore giving the Raiders the win 17-6. |
The thing that held them back was the scheme and coaching. Al always stuck to his man to man defense and only brought in players who could play man to man. You seem them playing some zone and they were terrible. Having Allen and Tarver come in breathes new life into this fairly young D.
With coaching the biggest example can be seen in Rolando McClain. He wasn't a sound tackler and only relied on his strength. Now under the new regime he's attacking gaps and wrapping up ball carriers. He was left to do so much in coverage and not what played to his strengths. Plus the guy is lighter and his ankle is healthier.
I mean we held the Chargers to 5 FGs when their average starting field position was our 47 due to our Long Snapper going down. Tommy Kelly kept the only TD drive going with 2 Offside penalties. Despite that don't expect us to be penalty infested like in the past.
_________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green4gulf
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 2746
Location: The Treasure Coast
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't see this game as a sure Dolphins win by any means. Oakland's Offense has speed and talent despite what some people may claim, and their Defensive Line is probably going to demolish our RT and RG.
If Oakland isolates Misi with Mcfadden in the passing game it could be goodbye Mcfadden....Despite Oaklands lack of success last week to the WR's I'm concerned about our DB's....Smith continues to have terrible ball skills even when he's in position to make plays on the ball, and Richard Marshall was at best ineffective in his first start as a Dolphin last week.
I think this one could go either way, and like so many other games turnovers will be the deciding factor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dante9876
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 25815
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheKillerNacho wrote: | | Deets wrote: | | Can't we just agree that neither team has a receiving corp in the top 20 for the league? Because there are definitely 20 teams whos receivers I would take over Miami and Oakland's. Its kind of like you guys are arguing about who's turd is a more lovely shade of brown. |
Honestly, both teams have bottom 5 receiving corp. |
No we dont. even if you take out Ford cause health.
Rams, Dolphins, Browns, Colts, Vikings, Rams, Titans. Also Jets, Bills, and seahawks are all debatable. Yall are selling a team that was 11 in receiving yards last year very short. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
agarcia34
Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Posts: 6223
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
 reading this is comical
Has Tannehill learned how to pass the ball beyond the LOS. 19 Passes batted down in college in 19 games and had 5 of them batted down last week. Oakland has a tall defense line could see a couple more.
D.Moore > anyone of the Dolphins WR's. let's be real.
_________________
#Dodgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green4gulf
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 2746
Location: The Treasure Coast
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| agarcia34 wrote: | reading this is comical
Has Tannehill learned how to pass the ball beyond the LOS. 19 Passes batted down in college in 19 games and had 5 of them batted down last week. Oakland has a tall defense line could see a couple more.
D.Moore > anyone of the Dolphins WR's. let's be real. |
Oakland's defensive line is overlooked IMO. They're tough, and Seymour is probably going to throw our RT Martin around like a rag doll.
and yes D. Moore is easily > than any of our WR's.
I see Oakland as having more talent than we do, and the only reason I think it could be a close game is because Oakland has the big trip to Miami and because I think our Defense will give up some big plays but will hold in the red zone.....Oakland 10, Miami 13. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ovaw8lover
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 9320
Location: Dolphins Stadium
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dolphinemidget wrote: | I do not think this game is a gimmie, Oakland could back to work and make a turn around, so please dont get it twisted and think this is a lock, Palmer is not washed up and has some good weapons to move the ball around. If Oaklands D would wake up they could be a very diffrent team this season. I see this game being more within reach as a win then last week. Two things will matter here, whoever runs the ball better, and whoever makes the most of oppertunities given to them.
I see Tanney getting his first TD this game. I also think Smith gets INT, Wake with 1 1/2 sacks.
Raiders 23 Dolphins 16 |
Wo, wo, wo, wo!!! "Gimmie?" Why would anyone every associate the Miami Dolphins and "gimmie" in the same sentence? Miami is among the worst teams in the NFL so I do not understand why anyone will ever think a game is a gimmie. You take the worst team in the NFL and put them against Miami and the game is sure to end up 3-0. I think the Raiders have more talent than Miami. Hell, I think the Raiders have the talent to be a better than average team. I expect the Raiders to win this game but the fact they played on Monday Night and had to fly cross country for an early game equalizes this matchup.
_________________
"Yesterday Is History, Tomorrow Is A Mystery, And Today Is A Gift. That Is Why It Is Called The Present.""
— — Master Oogway from Kung Fu Panda |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
agarcia34
Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Posts: 6223
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good luck guys
| Quote: | | Nannee could walk on as the #1 WR in Oak today !!! |
_________________
#Dodgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phinsforlife
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3533
Location: University of South Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Oh god, that attendance is absolutely atrocious.
_________________
GO BULLS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FOOTBALLFAN08
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 6802
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Tannehill is atrocious
_________________
I didn't give the Dolphins any real credit in my post because I wanted to agitate FOOTBALLFAN08, in the event he was still checking this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fins20??SBChamp
Joined: 30 Dec 2010
Posts: 606
Location: Tampa
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
[quote="FOOTBALLFAN08"]Tannehill is atrocious[/quote
At least he hasn't turned the ball over. That's a plus.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DolphWins
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 1741
Location: Nashville
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Beast run by Reggie.
_________________
B-Net Nadasdy#1894 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phinsforlife
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 3533
Location: University of South Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
REGGIEEEEEEE
_________________
GO BULLS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
