| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JCBrowns21
Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 875
Location: Chi Town
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: T-Rich |
 |
|
|
Lots of criticism to come to Weeden following this lost (deservedly so), but what about the game T-Rich had?
Disgusting. 19 carries for 39 yards. And we traded UP for this????
I believe that Heckert and Holmgren have been grossly overrated and today did nothing to dispell that theory.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brownsfan214
Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1024
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject: Re: T-Rich |
|
|
|
| JCBrowns21 wrote: | Lots of criticism to come to Weeden following this lost (deservedly so), but what about the game T-Rich had?
Disgusting. 19 carries for 39 yards. And we traded UP for this????
I believe that Heckert and Holmgren have been grossly overrated and today did nothing to dispell that theory. |
While he did have a bad game, I couldnt help to feel sorry for him at points. The line did nothing to get him any holes.
_________________
Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lesser
Joined: 28 Jun 2010
Posts: 428
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hornbybrown
Joined: 25 Jan 2008
Posts: 12817
Location: dunedin new zealand
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Really....... The OL was horrible and the play calling was bad as well. We only ran left at there best LBer.
We don't need threads like this.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 24024
Location: Chubs for Chud
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: T-Rich |
|
|
|
| brownsfan214 wrote: | | JCBrowns21 wrote: | Lots of criticism to come to Weeden following this lost (deservedly so), but what about the game T-Rich had?
Disgusting. 19 carries for 39 yards. And we traded UP for this????
I believe that Heckert and Holmgren have been grossly overrated and today did nothing to dispell that theory. |
While he did have a bad game, I couldnt help to feel sorry for him at points. The line did nothing to get him any holes. |
yeah the OL freaking sucked!!!
couldnt open holes and couldnt pick up blitzers
our RBs were awful at picking up bliters too.
one play that sticks on is Jackson, who is suppose to be a good blocker was suppose to step up and cut the DE and he dropped his head and tried to cut and completely whiffed and the DE forced Weeden to rush his pass and guess what...it was a bad pass, i wonder why.
all around blocking was awful
_________________
XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bart
Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 1677
Location: Erie Pa
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hold on there. What do you expect running into 8 and 9 man fronts when they knew we were running.
Did you see him smack that guy!!!!!!!!
Question is do we need a real OC or a QB who knows how to call an audible.
_________________
In the years to come, The Browns will win the SUPER BOWL again, and AGAIN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCBrowns21
Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 875
Location: Chi Town
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He had 19 rushes for 39 yards. 3rd overall pick. Process that before commenting.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DawgX
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 9908
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The offensive line created no holes for Richardson to run through. There were a bunch of defenders on him right away nearly every time he was handed the ball so he had no chance to do anything. Plus, I imagine he was rusty since he didn't play at all in the preseason.
That was some of the worst run blocking I've seen in a long time. I don't think there's any running back in the league who would have had success running behind Cleveland's offensive line today. I would have liked to see him run the ball to the outside because it was obvious running up the middle wasn't working.
_________________
Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee
Kiltman on the great sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCBrowns21
Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 875
Location: Chi Town
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| hornbybrown wrote: | Really....... The OL was horrible and the play calling was bad as well. We only ran left at there best LBer.
We don't need threads like this. |
What threads do we need? Don't take your anger/frustrations out on me.
Let me know if ANY other starting RB gets less than 39 yards or 2.1 avg.
If the o-line is to blame, I blame Heckert and Holmgren. If T-Rich is to blame, I blame Heckert and Holmgren.
RGIII looked incredible, Weeden and T-Rich looked like trash.
Let's see how they respond, but let's stop defending the front office.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bonanza23
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 5413
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We should cut he and Weeds. He's on pace for 304 carries for 624 yards. Bust. One game and I'm convinced. BTW Robertson will be in the hall of fame. He's on pace for 16 ints. So is Haden.
_________________
Thanks to ReggieCamp on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
roger murdock
Joined: 13 Dec 2010
Posts: 5215
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think he had more yards after contact than he did rushing yards. He was hit behind the line on almost every single play.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCBrowns21
Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 875
Location: Chi Town
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DawgX wrote: | The offensive line created no holes for Richardson to run through. There were a bunch of defenders on him right away nearly every time he was handed the ball so he had no chance to do anything. Plus, I imagine he was rusty since he didn't play at all in the preseason.
That was some of the worst run blocking I've seen in a long time. I don't think there's any running back in the league who would have had success running behind Cleveland's offensive line today. I would have liked to see him run the ball to the outside because it was obvious running up the middle wasn't working. |
Bull he had a few opportunities and did nothing. Granted the line I'd him no favors, but he did have Hanes to break a few for 5-10 yards.
Some work in the preseason would have been good.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 24024
Location: Chubs for Chud
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bart wrote: | Hold on there. What do you expect running into 8 and 9 man fronts when they knew we were running.
Did you see him smack that guy!!!!!!!!
Question is do we need a real OC or a QB who knows how to call an audible. |
u mean smack the guy who already had his hat falling off...his smack is getting extremely overrated
_________________
XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bonanza23
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 5413
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| roger murdock wrote: | | I think he had more yards after contact than he did rushing yards. He was hit behind the line on almost every single play. |
OK so he had what? 1.8 yards after contact? (just a guess)
He's a bust, I've seen all I need to see.
_________________
Thanks to ReggieCamp on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pnies20
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 6740
Location: Nashville through Erie, PA
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hating on Richardson? Our OL looked worse than it ever has.
_________________
Trent Richardson please!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
