Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Mike Brisel overrated !

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
silver_surfer


Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 265
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:22 am    Post subject: Mike Brisel overrated ! Reply with quote

He's gets burned alot, I thought he was a stud..

Should of just kept Samson Sateele. He was a warrior and leader, and could long snap..

Our left side was special
Valdheer and Wiz idk why we messed with something not broken
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lilcrazycat1


Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 940
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:27 am    Post subject: Re: Mike Brisel overrated ! Reply with quote

silver_surfer wrote:
He's gets burned alot, I thought he was a stud..

Should of just kept Samson Sateele. He was a warrior and leader, and could long snap..

Our left side was special
Valdheer and Wiz idk why we messed with something not broken


where was wiz tonight??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
NickButera


Moderator
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Posts: 6915
Location: Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SilverSurfer.... just a quick note, we'll have plenty of post game threads to cover a multitude of conversations. There is no need to clutter the forums with a thread for every bad idea you may think of.
_________________
Bah-Weep-Granah-Weep-Nini-Bong

My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaiderX


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 21590
Location: Crown Town, CA
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He didn't look good all preseason and in this game either.

Its early but hopefully this dude isn't a waste of money.
_________________

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
OakRaiders3828


Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 10165
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another thread from you?
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaisinBran


Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 10287
Location: 925/805
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I think most of it can be atrributed to Barnes, who was burnt bad like 4 times. Anyone know how many sacks Barnes gave up? I counted atleast 2.

Briesel has to play next to Barnes, who is absolutely terrible in pass protection... so Briesel not only has to take care of his assignment, but make sure Barnes doesn't screw up as well.
_________________

(NFL)=Raiders, (MLB)=A's, (NBA)= Warriors
PSN: KDubBallin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 11135
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup

$$

hahahahahahaha!!!
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darbsk


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 1411
Location: Wales, UK
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RaisinBran wrote:
Well, I think most of it can be atrributed to Barnes, who was burnt bad like 4 times. Anyone know how many sacks Barnes gave up? I counted atleast 2.

Briesel has to play next to Barnes, who is absolutely terrible in pass protection... so Briesel not only has to take care of his assignment, but make sure Barnes doesn't screw up as well.


+1

I didn't think Briesel did anything too bad, maybe didn't have the impact we'd hoped for in the run game but it seemed mostly Barnes who was struggling in pass protection. For the first 3 quarters our pass protection was good i thought, they obviously knew we were passing in the 4th and could tee off so you have to give that consideration.
_________________
"The fire that burns brightest in the Raiders organization is the will to win."
Mr. Al Davis RIP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Silver&Black88


Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 37110
Location: Boston, MA
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NickButera wrote:
SilverSurfer.... just a quick note, we'll have plenty of post game threads to cover a multitude of conversations. There is no need to clutter the forums with a thread for every bad idea you may think of.



_________________

#FreeAgent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZoomWaffle


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5559
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RaisinBran wrote:
Well, I think most of it can be atrributed to Barnes, who was burnt bad like 4 times. Anyone know how many sacks Barnes gave up? I counted atleast 2.

Briesel has to play next to Barnes, who is absolutely terrible in pass protection... so Briesel not only has to take care of his assignment, but make sure Barnes doesn't screw up as well.


+1

Playing next to our worst offensive lineman is undoubtedly going to make things harder on him.
_________________


Trojan on the sig

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G


Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 3384
Location: Hollywierd
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Yup

$$

hahahahahahaha!!!


I thought she costed $$$ Laughing

Didn't think he was 'special' just solid.
Barnes Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZoomWaffle


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5559
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Yup

$$

hahahahahahaha!!!


I thought she costed $$$ Laughing

Didn't think he was 'special' just solid.
Barnes Rolling Eyes


+1

Nobody claimed Brisel was going to be a Pro-Bowl guard for us. He didnt come over here highly decorated or highly touted. He came over here as a starting offensive linemen.
_________________


Trojan on the sig

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SPaceGhost


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 2279
Location: Alabama
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How did you manage to confuse Brisiel with Barnes?! Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmac505


Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 950
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZoomWaffle wrote:
RaisinBran wrote:
Well, I think most of it can be atrributed to Barnes, who was burnt bad like 4 times. Anyone know how many sacks Barnes gave up? I counted atleast 2.

Briesel has to play next to Barnes, who is absolutely terrible in pass protection... so Briesel not only has to take care of his assignment, but make sure Barnes doesn't screw up as well.


+1

Playing next to our worst offensive lineman is undoubtedly going to make things harder on him.


+2
especially because our 2nd worst lineman was on his otherside.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group