| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gportillo52
Joined: 08 Sep 2008
Posts: 141
Location: sacramento, california
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
epicMustache
Joined: 19 Jul 2010
Posts: 631
Location: Tallahassee
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:10 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Think most of us were expecting this, but good to hear. He's earned it... 
_________________
| THE PACK MAN wrote: | | ... but the Packers wouldnt be as good if they had the 49ers defense. |
- Adopt a Buc -
Dallas Clark - TE - 47 REC, 435 YDS, 4 TDs, 9.3 AVG |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tml_gogo
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 11711
Location: Montréal
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He has looked fantastic, Blount just runs into the backs of the o-line..easy choice.
_________________
El Ramster |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MOSteelers56
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 4629
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Does Blunt still figure to be a big part of the offense, or will you look to move him?
_________________
Thanks, Deadpulse for the best sig I've ever rocked |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucsfan333
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 21952
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MOSteelers56 wrote: | | Does Blunt still figure to be a big part of the offense, or will you look to move him? |
I doubt we move him. And, given Schiano's history, it's tough to tell if he gets many carries.
_________________
| BigBillsFan13 wrote: | | you're damn sexy too |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
REDandPEWTER
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 3804
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bucsfan333 wrote: | | MOSteelers56 wrote: | | Does Blunt still figure to be a big part of the offense, or will you look to move him? |
I doubt we move him. And, given Schiano's history, it's tough to tell if he gets many carries. |
I wouldn't rule it out. Depends on what we get for Blount. Michael smith has shown enough to be the # 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eyyee
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 4047
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| As expected, Martin is just flat out better. Excited to see him in some real games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Buccskis TDskis
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 49
Location: London, ON Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It will be nice to have a Tampa version of Ray Rice. Teams will have to guess whether were running or passing now.
_________________
Adopt a Bucc-
Mike Williams: 63 rec 996 yards 9 td
Roy Miller: 13 tackles 1 PD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucsfan333
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 21952
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| REDandPEWTER wrote: | | bucsfan333 wrote: | | MOSteelers56 wrote: | | Does Blunt still figure to be a big part of the offense, or will you look to move him? |
I doubt we move him. And, given Schiano's history, it's tough to tell if he gets many carries. |
I wouldn't rule it out. Depends on what we get for Blount. Michael smith has shown enough to be the # 2. |
Would you move him for a third or a fourth? I don't know if I would. And that's about what I see us getting for him.
I'd like to see more from Smith before he's handed the number two spot.
_________________
| BigBillsFan13 wrote: | | you're damn sexy too |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaRealdeal
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 8612
Location: Jamison. on the sig
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Buccskis TDskis wrote: | | It will be nice to have a Tampa version of Ray Rice. Teams will have to guess whether were running or passing now. |
Well said. We won't be nearly as predictable as we used to be with Blount.
Martin has been as advertised. I couldn't be happier with him. He could flirt with 1,500 yards from scrimmage as a rookie.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
REDandPEWTER
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 3804
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bucsfan333 wrote: | | REDandPEWTER wrote: | | bucsfan333 wrote: | | MOSteelers56 wrote: | | Does Blunt still figure to be a big part of the offense, or will you look to move him? |
I doubt we move him. And, given Schiano's history, it's tough to tell if he gets many carries. |
I wouldn't rule it out. Depends on what we get for Blount. Michael smith has shown enough to be the # 2. |
Would you move him for a third or a fourth? I don't know if I would. And that's about what I see us getting for him.
I'd like to see more from Smith before he's handed the number two spot. |
Honestly we still will be one dimensional with Blount on the roster. Martin I see getting the bulk of the load bc Blount is still one dimensional. I think a 3rd or 4th rd pick is a steal for Blount if you ask me.
Smith I think has done enough to ear the # 2 job bc other than the one drive against Miami Blount has t Done much |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
REDandPEWTER
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 3804
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaRealdeal wrote: | | Buccskis TDskis wrote: | | It will be nice to have a Tampa version of Ray Rice. Teams will have to guess whether were running or passing now. |
Well said. We won't be nearly as predictable as we used to be with Blount.
Martin has been as advertised. I couldn't be happier with him. He could flirt with 1,500 yards from scrimmage as a rookie. |
This. And honestly I see Martin getting the bulk of the snaps bc Blount is still one dimensional. Martin is as advertised and I love it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucsfan333
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 21952
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| REDandPEWTER wrote: | Honestly we still will be one dimensional with Blount on the roster. Martin I see getting the bulk of the load bc Blount is still one dimensional. I think a 3rd or 4th rd pick is a steal for Blount if you ask me.
Smith I think has done enough to ear the # 2 job bc other than the one drive against Miami Blount has t Done much |
He had 1,000 yards as a rookie and almost had 800 last year. I don't think that exactly qualifies as "hasn't done enough." Smith would fall under that category.
22 carries
79 yards
3 receptions
18 yards
That doesn't exactly scream proven to me.
_________________
| BigBillsFan13 wrote: | | you're damn sexy too |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
REDandPEWTER
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 3804
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bucsfan333 wrote: | | REDandPEWTER wrote: | Honestly we still will be one dimensional with Blount on the roster. Martin I see getting the bulk of the load bc Blount is still one dimensional. I think a 3rd or 4th rd pick is a steal for Blount if you ask me.
Smith I think has done enough to ear the # 2 job bc other than the one drive against Miami Blount has t Done much |
He had 1,000 yards as a rookie and almost had 800 last year. I don't think that exactly qualifies as "hasn't done enough." Smith would fall under that category.
22 carries
79 yards
3 receptions
18 yards
That doesn't exactly scream proven to me. |
Still can't block or catch. One dimensional. Martin will take the bulk of snaps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bzane
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 414
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Perhaps Blount will crush Doug Martin with one mighty blow of his fist, and re-claim the starting job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
