Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

The Really Early 2013 Draft Database
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea, Jarvis Jones is an animal. Honestly I'd compare him to more of a poor mans version of Lawrence Taylor. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the first player that comes to mind.

Apparently I need to scout Chase Thomas with how much all of you love him.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21260
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, Jarvis Jones is an animal. Honestly I'd compare him to more of a poor mans version of Lawrence Taylor. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the first player that comes to mind.

Apparently I need to scout Chase Thomas with how much all of you love him.
He's just very versatile and seems fluid enough to be a SLB in our scheme.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 11574
Location: New York
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, Jarvis Jones is an animal. Honestly I'd compare him to more of a poor mans version of Lawrence Taylor. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the first player that comes to mind.

Apparently I need to scout Chase Thomas with how much all of you love him.


Jarvis Jones is an absolute animal i love him i just doubt he is there when we pick thats why i havent talked about him
_________________


Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange


#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

klyon7634 wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, Jarvis Jones is an animal. Honestly I'd compare him to more of a poor mans version of Lawrence Taylor. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the first player that comes to mind.

Apparently I need to scout Chase Thomas with how much all of you love him.


Jarvis Jones is an absolute animal i love him i just doubt he is there when we pick thats why i havent talked about him



Jones would absolutely be my #1 pick as a SLB in our scheme, but what's the point? He's gonna be long gone, when we pick. There's no point even mentioning him in the same breath with the Seahawks. It isn't gonna happen. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21260
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.
Isn't he still young? I think he's more athletic than Reese.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.



FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CanadianHawk75


Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Posts: 113
Location: Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys really need to watch this Brandon Coleman kid from Rutgers. Huge player at 6'5 220 pounds and is one of those freak WRs like Larry or Megatron, although clearly not at the same point as they are.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc8QWAVE0Nc&feature=player_embedded

He basically is what i want from this draft at all costs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know it's very early, but in my latest 7 round mock, I have us taking.....


1. Terrance Williams, WR, Baylor
2. Chris Jones, DT/DE, Bowling Green
3. Earl Watford, OG, James Madison
4. Travis Long, SLB, Washington State
4. Brian Winters, OT, Kent State
5. Markus Wheaton, WR, Oregon State
6. Rashaan Melvin, CB, Northern Illinois
6. Colby Cameron, QB, La. Tech
7. Caraun Reid, DT/DE, Princeton


Last edited by TheOsprey on Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:48 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.



No. Good FB's can be signed after the draft. It's a position few teams utilize anymore, so tons of very good FB's are left undrafted. Using your own example, Reece was an undrafted free agent. I'd never use a draft pick on one, knowing I very well might get that same guy or someone very similar as an undrafted free agent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21260
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.
I'd use a 6th on him with no issue. I really not unhappy with what Mike Rob has developed into.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.
I'd use a 6th on him with no issue. I really not unhappy with what Mike Rob has developed into.



Why? Especially if you're o.k. with M. Rob? That would be a waste of a pick. I'd use that pick to build depth in areas where we have little.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheOsprey wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.
I'd use a 6th on him with no issue. I really not unhappy with what Mike Rob has developed into.



Why? Especially if you're o.k. with M. Rob? That would be a waste of a pick. I'd use that pick to build depth in areas where we have little.


To diversify your weapons. Burton is something completely unique, just like Marcel Reece. Knowing what we know now about Reece, I guarantee no team in the league would allow him to go undrafted.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7920
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, there really is no point talking about him. He's a top 5 prospect and we're clearly not a top 5 team.

Anyways, I have a man crush on Trey Burton. I think he's exactly the type of weapon we could utilize at the FB position, much like Marcel Reece.


FB? Only if he signs as an undrafted free agent. I don't believe in wasting picks on FB's.


You wouldn't "waste" a pick on Marcel Reece? Burton is more athletic than Reese and adds a completely new dimension to the offense. I'd use a 4th or 5th on him with no issue.
I'd use a 6th on him with no issue. I really not unhappy with what Mike Rob has developed into.



Why? Especially if you're o.k. with M. Rob? That would be a waste of a pick. I'd use that pick to build depth in areas where we have little.


To diversify your weapons. Burton is something completely unique, just like Marcel Reece. Knowing what we know now about Reece, I guarantee no team in the league would allow him to go undrafted.



He's not Reece though. He's Burton. Maybe after being in the NFL a few years, teams might regret letting him get drafted late, but the fact remains that FB's can be had late in the draft and possibly after the draft is over. You use the draft to upgrade positions of need and build depth. I highly doubt we'd even carry 2 FB's at this point, unless you'd part with M. Rob. I never liked Robinson, but even I have to admit that he has turned into a very good lead blocker, so I'd keep him.

We have dire needs at WR and SLB, we'll need to draft a QB (since there is no way the Seahawks are gonna keep a $20 million backup, beyond this season), we need added depth on the O-Line, D-Line and CB as well. That's where I focus our draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 19, 20, 21  Next
Page 4 of 21

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group