Michael Vick

ninjapirate · Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 28440 Location: Vegas

Ok, so after Nick Foles looked like a competent qb this preseason it brought up the future and if Vick should stay beyond this up coming season.

Now personally I think Michael is garbage. He had a nice 6 game run but pretty much since the vikings game in 2010 he has been awful. He turns the ball over way too much, he still can't read a defense, he is made of glass, he's not smart enough to throw the ball away. I mean he sucks.

Why should we keep him after this season regardless of Nick Foles? Do you want Vick to stay past this year?
_________________

eaglesfan10 · Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 8728 Location: Mack. on the sig

It would be nice if he didn't get injured every time someone touched him.
_________________

PowerElite · Joined: 25 Dec 2009 Posts: 7674

Anyone have a better QB to replace Vick with? This sounds an awful lot like some of the initial rationale for replacing McNabb with Kolb. I'm all for upgrading, but I'm totally against "hope and change." You guys sound like the Obama campaign platform. Laughing

Hammertime52 · Joined: 15 Jan 2012 Posts: 5178 Location: South Jersey

Do i think Michael Vick is good? Yes

Do i think he can win a Super Bowl? No
_________________

Bird Watch: Brent Celek
Catches: 41 Yards: 509 TDs: 1 EPIC Hurdles: 1

jonu62882 · Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 18416 Location: Philadelphia, PA

You wanna crown 'em after one preseason?!

Then crown em!

If he does well this year and rebounds back to 2010 form, I don't see why we don't keep him.

Phire · Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject:

This is an important year for Vick.
_________________

ninjapirate · Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 28440 Location: Vegas

eaglesfan10 · Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 8728 Location: Mack. on the sig

WhackyPlague · Joined: 25 May 2008 Posts: 3859 Location: South Carolina

Vick is good. He's also wildly inconsistent and injury prone. He's not a long term solution, but he's definitely our best option for this year.

SiLo · Joined: 05 Sep 2009 Posts: 10627 Location: Dade County

Bleedin_Green36 · Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 8231 Location: Rochester, NY

Vick is too short to play QB. So I would love a replacement.
_________________

Jamison. on the crazyyyy sig.
Sacramento Kings, Philadelphia Eagles & Georgia Bulldogs <3333

Nabbs4u · Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:47 pm Post subject:

jonu62882 · Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 18416 Location: Philadelphia, PA

Wow, I see everyone is completely off the Vick-wagon.

Kinda reminds me of when people did the same thing with Kolb over McNabb.

Hammertime52 · Joined: 15 Jan 2012 Posts: 5178 Location: South Jersey

Phire · Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject:

I think the biggest issue that has become very evident is that Vick is the same QB he always was. He's on a better team, with better supporting players and a better coach.

His first games as QB where he lit the world on fire... that happens often to quarterbacks who emerge onto the scene unsuspected. The great quarterbacks continue success despite their entire skill-set and arsenal being out in the open for defenses to study.

Vick hasn't done that.

I will support Vick so-as-long as he is the Eagles quarterback, because I'm a homer like that and always have been for every QB, but I have no problem expressing my serious doubts.

Can we win with Vick? Yeah, but we're going to need our defense to play great defense, and the rest of our offense (namely Shady) to be just as dangerous as Vick is, not making Vick the focal point of our offense and subsequently the attacking point of defenses.
_________________