Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Kyle Cook to 'IR-Recall', TE Richard Quinn signed

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LondonBengal


Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 3336
Location: London, England, UK
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:17 am    Post subject: Kyle Cook to 'IR-Recall', TE Richard Quinn signed Reply with quote

As expected, Centre Kyle Cook was placed on the 'IR-Recall' list Tuesday, being replaced by ex-Bronco and Redskin TE Richard Quinn.

The opening day '53' now appears to be......

QB (2)-Dalton/ Gradkowski
RB (5)-BJGE/ Leonard/ Peerman/ Pressley/ Scott
WR (7)-Binns/ Green/ Hawkins/ Jones/ Sanu/ Tate/ Whalen
TE (4)-Charles/ Gresham/ Lee/ Quinn
OL (8)-Boling/ Collins/ Faine/ Robinson/ Roland/ Smith/ Whitworth/ Zeitler.

DL (8)-Anderson/ Atkins/ Dunlap/ Geathers/ Johnson/ Peko/ Still/ Thompson.
LB (6)-Burfict/ Howard/ Lawson/ Maualuga/ Rey/ Skuta
DB (10)-Allen/ Clements/ Hall/ Iloka/ Jones/ Kirkpatrick/ Mays/ Miles/ Nelson/ Newman.

ST's (3)-Harris/ Huber/ Nugent

plus 8 x PSq-OT Adams/ RB Brooks/ TE Davis/ CB Harris-Lewis/ RB Herron/OG Hudson/ LB Lamur/ QB Z.Robinson.

I suppose the most debateable elements of the roster is having 7 x WR, and only going with 8 x OL on the 53, but with 2 OL on the PSq. When was the last year this happened ?

Another interesting thing about the OL, is all 8 guys have played Guard.......

I guess they think the 7th WR is a better guy than the 9th OL.......
_________________
" Democracy is a system where two idiots can out-vote a genius..........."


Last edited by LondonBengal on Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
theJ


Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 18847
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't quite understand the Quinn move. I guess we'll find out Monday, but i expect him to be inactive every Sunday unless Gresham and Lee are both hurt.

Oh well. The 53rd player wasn't likely to make an impact anyways.
_________________


Don't follow your passion, take your passion with you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
INbengalfan


Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 5610
Location: Richmond, IN
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The seventh WR is a better player than the 9th OL or even Muckelroy, I guess. Plus, the bottom 6 WRs contribute on special teams in many ways, making them more dimensional. Whalen won't dress for a lot of games I would think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LondonBengal


Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 3336
Location: London, England, UK
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

INbengalfan wrote:
The seventh WR is a better player than the 9th OL or even Muckelroy, I guess. Plus, the bottom 6 WRs contribute on special teams in many ways, making them more dimensional. Whalen won't dress for a lot of games I would think.


Anyone think the 7th WR is there as 'trade bait'? If someone offers a top-100 draft pick next year for Brandon Tate; (nominally a #2 WR); for example, are they gonna turn it down ?

Looking down the NFL rosters there are some teams that look a little thin at WR.
_________________
" Democracy is a system where two idiots can out-vote a genius..........."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
INbengalfan


Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 5610
Location: Richmond, IN
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LondonBengal wrote:
INbengalfan wrote:
The seventh WR is a better player than the 9th OL or even Muckelroy, I guess. Plus, the bottom 6 WRs contribute on special teams in many ways, making them more dimensional. Whalen won't dress for a lot of games I would think.


Anyone think the 7th WR is there as 'trade bait'? If someone offers a top-100 draft pick next year for Brandon Tate; (nominally a #2 WR); for example, are they gonna turn it down ?

Looking down the NFL rosters there are some teams that look a little thin at WR.


I thought about that, and it could happen. Just not yet. With the extended trade deadline, things could always happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LondonBengal


Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 3336
Location: London, England, UK
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

INbengalfan wrote:
The seventh WR is a better player than the 9th OL or even Muckelroy.


Muckleroy not being snapped up by another team is a little surprising, given his decent showing in pre-season. Maybe the other 31 teams know something we don't, like a NFL suspension coming prehaps ?
_________________
" Democracy is a system where two idiots can out-vote a genius..........."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
johndeere1707


Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 6006
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suprising they didn't bring up Hudson
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
INbengalfan


Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 5610
Location: Richmond, IN
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

johndeere1707 wrote:
Suprising they didn't bring up Hudson


Not really. Dude only plays RG, and we need versatile OLs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group