| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
turtle28
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 57504
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: should we sign billy cundiff? |
 |
|
|
I just heard on nfl sirius that the ravens cut Billy Cundiff in favor of their young kicker, Turner I think.
I think this an obvious question but should the steelers sign him?
My answer is an emphatic YES!
_________________
 mike23md | Marcus21 wrote: | | The secondary...OMG what a bag of turds! |
Brian Orakpo:50 tkls, 8.5 sacks, 4 PDs, Int for TDRIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelers22
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 1334
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
A lot better than anybody we got now. I'd be in favor of it
_________________
props to dawg24 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JustPlainNasty
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 6841
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No. They got rid of Cundiff to save money. We need to do so far more than they do.
Neither Hrapmann or Suisham has missed a kick this preseason.
_________________
| Dcash4 wrote: |
...you have a forum resume? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gibbons
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 105
Location: Philly
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Cundiff's placekicking has been spotty at best other than 2010, not any better than Suisham's, also not significantly worse. After the kickoffs got moved up 5 yards Cundiffs value in kickoffs really dropped off IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
turtle28
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 57504
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JustPlainNasty wrote: | No. They got rid of Cundiff to save money. We need to do so far more than they do.
Neither Hrapmann or Suisham has missed a kick this preseason. |
I think you bring up a good point on cost. That would be the determining factor imo.
As for the other kicks, there ok but don't have the leg Cundiff has.
_________________
mike23md | Marcus21 wrote: | | The secondary...OMG what a bag of turds! |
Brian Orakpo:50 tkls, 8.5 sacks, 4 PDs, Int for TDRIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Somefootballfan
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 2004
Location: Interwebz
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | JustPlainNasty wrote: | No. They got rid of Cundiff to save money. We need to do so far more than they do.
Neither Hrapmann or Suisham has missed a kick this preseason. |
I think you bring up a good point on cost. That would be the determining factor imo.
As for the other kicks, there ok but don't have the leg Cundiff has. |
What is this leg that he has? His longest kick is 56 yards. He has a huge leg, but his accuracy sucks from 50+ yards. He was a good kickoff guy, but since the kickoffs were moved to the 35, everyone and their mother is a good kickoff guy.
Also Hrapmann had a kick off go through the uprights and during warmups kicks 53-55 yarders with plenty of room to spare, and has a 59 yarder in a college game. If the Steelers want someone with leg, they'd go for him, no reason to spend money (which they don't have) on a has-been kicker from a rival team.
_________________
Last edited by Somefootballfan on Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:16 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ward4HOF
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 3015
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If the team is leaning Suisham right now, yes...
if they are leaning Hrapmann, no...because salary cap has to be the primary factor in that decision.
Cundiff is >> Suisham. They both choke on occasion, but Cundiff is an overall better kicker, I think.
How has Cundiff been on Heinz Field...that should also be factored in.
_________________
Props to Jamison on the sweet sig!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FourThreeMafia
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 44266
Location: East of Sixburgh
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Cundiff, at best, is a lateral move from Suisham.
No.
_________________
| NextBigThing wrote: | | if i were the pats, i would take [Luck] only after brady and rodgers. i prefer luck to manning, brees, and many others |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
armsteeld
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 3108
Location: In your head
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FourThreeMafia wrote: | Cundiff, at best, is a lateral move from Suisham.
No. |
I agree.
_________________
"Sheep follow the flock for direction and security but scatter at the sight of the lone wolf". Rocky |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flaccomania
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 18963
Location: Parkville, MD
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | JustPlainNasty wrote: | No. They got rid of Cundiff to save money. We need to do so far more than they do.
Neither Hrapmann or Suisham has missed a kick this preseason. |
I think you bring up a good point on cost. That would be the determining factor imo.
As for the other kicks, there ok but don't have the leg Cundiff has. |
Cundiff does not have the leg people think he does, nor does he have any sort of accuracy from 50+ yards.
While I do think he's better than Suisham, it's not enough of an upgrade to make it worth it IMO. I think you guys should stay put.
_________________
| Piquel wrote: | | How can a final box score be misleading??? I mean that is how the game was played out. |
XBL GT: kanxalanx |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
