| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PantherDE90 
Joined: 01 Mar 2008 Posts: 2821 Location: Under the Freeway
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| james.mcmurry13 wrote: | | Panthers11 wrote: | | jfitz812 wrote: | | jfitz812 wrote: | | james.mcmurry13 wrote: | If you want a Carolina RB, draft Stewart. He's a good option around the 50th pick, especially in PPR leagues.
Smith and Newton will be overdrafted in almost every league.
DeAngelo can still be a good bench RB, occasional flex play.
Olsen is probably a fringe starting TE in most leagues, a definite starter in a big league.
Again, in a deep league Tolbert is probably a good bench player. |
Is Week 1 one of those weeks where DeAngelo is a decent flex play?
I have him as a bench RB but I didn't know the extent of Stewart's injury. As of now I have Trent Richardson/Doug Martin as flex options. Any chance I'd want to start DeAngelo over either of them? |
Soooooo..... ? That's a yes to the start? |
I'd start both Martin and Richardson over Williams. |
It depends on Richardson's injury status for this week, but I'd go Martin over Williams for sure. Richardson is a no-brainer for that spot when he's completely healthy though. |
I don't understand why people think Richardson is a "no-brainer". He's on the Browns. Newsflash they suck. Their passing game is non-existent and with bad WRs, a mediocre OLine and a rookie QB who probably won't do well he shouldn't be ranked so high. No doubt he's got mad talent. But there's going to be 8-9 in the box every play and he's not that talented. Plus, he's in one of the best divisions in football. _________________
"There are many things given to us in this life for the wrong reasons. What we do with such blessings, that is the true test of a man." - Gannicus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FriendlyEnemy 
Joined: 30 Dec 2010 Posts: 1404 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
LaFell or Olsen? I need some clutch flex play, and I'm leaning towards the better safety net in Olsen, but I think LaFell could make some clutch big plays. _________________
^^Peppers90^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boondock 
 Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 17635 Location: Waynesville, NC
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FriendlyEnemy wrote: | | LaFell or Olsen? I need some clutch flex play, and I'm leaning towards the better safety net in Olsen, but I think LaFell could make some clutch big plays. |
I would lean with Olsen to begin with, at least until we see how Brandon will be utilized. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|