Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

5 ups, 5 downs vs Bears
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Washington Redskins
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mattdee11


Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THESKINSFAN21


Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 4465
Location: West Palm Beach
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im very excited to watch the replay tomorrow on nfl network. I passed out during halftime saturday. Embarassed
_________________

mike23md on the sig
Adopt A Redskin- Trent Murphy/OLB-1 Tackle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mattdee11


Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THESKINSFAN21 wrote:
Im very excited to watch the replay tomorrow on nfl network. I passed out during halftime saturday. Embarassed


Might not be worth it now but I'd recommend getting preseason live on nfl .com . Well worth for 20 dollars . The condensed versions are awesome to keep up with other teams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woz


Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 20454
Location: in a land where the furniture folds to a much smaller size
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DCRED wrote:
Brandon Banks

Ko return 51 YDS 1174 AVG 23.0 Long 47 TDs 0

Punt Return 36 YDS 328 AVG 9.1 Long 55 TDS 0 FC 9(fumbles caused? not sure that one...)

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/wsh/washington-redskins

Am I reading that right that Banks got us 0 regular season TD's last year while Briscoe got 6 for Tampa Bay?


FC = Fair Catches
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woz


Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 20454
Location: in a land where the furniture folds to a much smaller size
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RSkinGM wrote:
I give you something irks me -- dang long snapper -- why in the world can't a REAL O line guy do that -- I know it's very specialized .. I wonder if any team nowadays has a two way guy -- A real O-line guy that plays AND long snaps.


I believe it was back when Gibbs was the head coach and Albright was the long snapper. Gibbs went to him and pulled him out of linemen drills and told him he wasn't going to do them anymore because his hands were too valuable to risk.

Think of it this way: if your center is also your long snapper and he gets hurt, you have to replace two guys not just one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
21 ALL THE WAY


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Posts: 3343
Location: WASHINGTON DC
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe


Grossman. I'm all for cutting Grossman to keep both Banks and Briscoe (players who will do more for this team than his INT throwing [inappropriate/removed])
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mattdee11


Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe


Grossman. I'm all for cutting Grossman to keep both Banks and Briscoe (players who will do more for this team than his INT throwing [inappropriate/removed])


I'm in
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
21 ALL THE WAY


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Posts: 3343
Location: WASHINGTON DC
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mattdee11 wrote:
21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe


Grossman. I'm all for cutting Grossman to keep both Banks and Briscoe (players who will do more for this team than his INT throwing [inappropriate/removed])


I'm in


But I wonder is Shanahan up for this? In his interviews he seems pretty stern on Banks having to make this team as a WR not just a KR/PR (even after Banks return on Saturday. Banks is not ur traditional WR but he can do alot with the ball in his hands on screens and trick plays (witch is why I'm on for keeping him aboard) Kyle/Mike just have to come up with the plays to make these things happen.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turtle28


Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 64612
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

21 ALL THE WAY wrote:


But I wonder is Shanahan up for this? In his interviews he seems pretty stern on Banks having to make this team as a WR not just a KR/PR (even after Banks return on Saturday. Banks is not ur traditional WR but he can do alot with the ball in his hands on screens and trick plays (witch is why I'm on for keeping him aboard) Kyle/Mike just have to come up with the plays to make these things happen.
couldn't have said it any better myself about Banksy. I still doubt they cut Grossman, but I'd be Elated if they did
_________________
RIP SSFmike23md

"God made certain people to play football... Sean was one" JG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Mattdee11


Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe


Grossman. I'm all for cutting Grossman to keep both Banks and Briscoe (players who will do more for this team than his INT throwing [inappropriate/removed])


I'm in


But I wonder is Shanahan up for this? In his interviews he seems pretty stern on Banks having to make this team as a WR not just a KR/PR (even after Banks return on Saturday. Banks is not ur traditional WR but he can do alot with the ball in his hands on screens and trick plays (witch is why I'm on for keeping him aboard) Kyle/Mike just have to come up with the plays to make these things happen.


I honestly believe they were gonna give Banks another shot given he showed any thing in preseason . I think it was more of a wake up call for banks to take his health and training habits a little more serious . Shannahan doesn't like to make his intentions of roster that public , so I found it a little odd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
21 ALL THE WAY


Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Posts: 3343
Location: WASHINGTON DC
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mattdee11 wrote:
21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
21 ALL THE WAY wrote:
Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe


Grossman. I'm all for cutting Grossman to keep both Banks and Briscoe (players who will do more for this team than his INT throwing [inappropriate/removed])


I'm in


But I wonder is Shanahan up for this? In his interviews he seems pretty stern on Banks having to make this team as a WR not just a KR/PR (even after Banks return on Saturday. Banks is not ur traditional WR but he can do alot with the ball in his hands on screens and trick plays (witch is why I'm on for keeping him aboard) Kyle/Mike just have to come up with the plays to make these things happen.


I honestly believe they were gonna give Banks another shot given he showed any thing in preseason . I think it was more of a wake up call for banks to take his health and training habits a little more serious . Shannahan doesn't like to make his intentions of roster that public , so I found it a little odd.


If they do, I hope it's with RG3 or Cousins as the QB. Even then still hopefully they call the rite play for Banks to make a play. Banks is not gonna out jump anyone at his size, but give him and quick slant and he may blow pass the defender. To sume my theory up, Banks needs to be our 6th WR (someone who dosent see the field much as WR) but earned his spot with his special teams play plain and simple. Shanahan and his stubborn ways may not see that though.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turtle28


Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 64612
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mattdee11 wrote:
turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
Cut Grossman problem solved:-)
Yeah, but they won't do that. I wished they would though



Not saying everone agrees with this but what position and who would have to go if we keep the following seven wrs

Garçon
Moss
Hankerson
Morgan
Robinsom
Banks
Briscoe
Well if we kept 7 wrs, I'd probably go with 9 OL because we can put Compton on the Practice squad and activate him if we have injuries. I think that's the easiest thing to do.

My problem though is still that Briscoe isn't going to be much of a contributor on our offense and isnt a special teams player. he still won't be next year if he was retained because he'd still be #5 and not a special teams player
_________________
RIP SSFmike23md

"God made certain people to play football... Sean was one" JG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Marcus21


Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 1200
Location: North Carolina
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My updated 53!!!!

O:

RG3, Cousins 2

Helu, Royster, Morris 3

Williams, Smith
Kory, Hurt,
Monty, LeRibbus 10
Chester, Gettis
Polumbus, Compton

Davis, Paulson, Paul 3

Garcon, Hankerson, Moss, Morgan, Robinson, Briscoe 6

D:

Cofield, Baker 2

Carriker, Jenkins, Bowen, Golsten, 4

Kerrigan, Orakpo, Riley, Fletcher, Robinson, Alexander, Jackson, Wilson 8

Meriweather, Williams, Jackson, Gomes 4

Hall, Wilson, Barnes, Thompson, Crawford 5

Gano
Sav
Sanderberg 4
Banks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turtle28


Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 64612
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcus21 wrote:
My updated 53!!!!

O:

RG3, Cousins 2

Helu, Royster, Morris 3

Williams, Smith
Kory, Hurt,
Monty, LeRibeus 10
Chester, Gettis
Polumbus, Compton

Davis, Paulsen, Paul 3

Garcon, Hankerson, Moss, Morgan, Robinson, Briscoe 6

D:

Cofield, Baker 2

Carriker, Jenkins, Bowen, Golsten, 4

Kerrigan, Orakpo, Riley, Fletcher, Robinson, Alexander, Jackson, Wilson 8

Meriweather, Williams, Jackson, Gomes 4

Hall, Wilson, Barnes, Thompson, Crawford 5

Gano
Sav
Sundberg 4
Banks
could happen I'm still not sure they get rid of Cooley though, he counts too much against the cap.
_________________
RIP SSFmike23md

"God made certain people to play football... Sean was one" JG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Mattdee11


Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 78
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

turtle28 wrote:
Marcus21 wrote:
My updated 53!!!!

O:

RG3, Cousins 2

Helu, Royster, Morris 3

Williams, Smith
Kory, Hurt,
Monty, LeRibeus 10
Chester, Gettis
Polumbus, Compton

Davis, Paulsen, Paul 3

Garcon, Hankerson, Moss, Morgan, Robinson, Briscoe 6

D:

Cofield, Baker 2

Carriker, Jenkins, Bowen, Golsten, 4

Kerrigan, Orakpo, Riley, Fletcher, Robinson, Alexander, Jackson, Wilson 8

Meriweather, Williams, Jackson, Gomes 4

Hall, Wilson, Barnes, Thompson, Crawford 5

Gano
Sav
Sundberg 4
Banks
could happen I'm still not sure they get rid of Cooley though, he counts too much against the cap.


Is it me or the above roster only adds up to 51?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Washington Redskins All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group