| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fired-Up
Joined: 27 Jul 2012 Posts: 788
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:40 pm Post subject: The No Huddle |
|
|
|
It sounds as if the Packers are going to use the no huddle as their base offense this season. I've read some articles about it and we've seen this through preseason. Not many teams really have the option of having this as their base offense. You need an experienced QB who understands the system like the back of his hand. Like Manning and Brady do.
The Colts were the only team I've seen recently that have used the no huddle as their base offense.
Why would we use this? Everybody says that it allows you to become the aggressor, the defense can't react to the fast paced nature. That's true, but I like the huddle. I like the preparation of the huddle. It can go both ways. The offense can be under prepared to run a certain play and get out of whack.
I know it's bland and traditional, but nothing beats lining up under center, having the coach do their job and calling a great play. That's mostly what we did last season and it worked. We occasionally went into no huddle if the offense stagnated, but other than that we didn't run it as a base offense.
I don't know, especially after seeing some meh results this preseason I don't know if I'm a no huddle fan. _________________ The Packers are the premier franchise in the NFL. DEAL WITH IT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JCamGOPACKGO 
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 Posts: 719 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I understand your concerns 100% and I share some of them. But I feel that this gives the Packers a HUGE advantage based on the amount of talent their offense has. With this no-huddle base, the defenses we face are going to be so off-balance on most of these no-huddle plays, so I feel the home-run play will happen enough to justify the occasional mishap. That's just the way I feel based on our talent at QB/WR/TE. It will be almost impossible for opposing D's not to be looking at multiple mismatches that work to our advantage on a fair amount of plays in this new base. I like it as the base, because when the situation calls for it, we can still easily go back to the huddle and take our time to prepare for the big moment or the important go-ahead drive.
I just feel like this no-huddle base will make it easier for the Pack to blow the lid off of games completely in the first half during the right matchup. Won't happen every time obviously but it will happen a decent amount if this is the system we are going to run a lot of the time. _________________
2012-13 ADOPT-A-PACKER: John Kuhn #30
55 yds/1TD Rushing-11 receptions/119 yds
Shout out to justo on the avatar! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pugger 
Joined: 01 May 2010 Posts: 4501 Location: UWGB for the summer!
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We are giving other teams another thing to worry about with Rodgers and company? Sounds like a good idea to me.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fired-Up
Joined: 27 Jul 2012 Posts: 788
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pugger wrote: | We are giving other teams another thing to worry about with Rodgers and company? Sounds like a good idea to me.  |
I'd take execution over confusion. _________________ The Packers are the premier franchise in the NFL. DEAL WITH IT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8741 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Fired-Up wrote: | | Pugger wrote: | We are giving other teams another thing to worry about with Rodgers and company? Sounds like a good idea to me.  |
I'd take execution over confusion. |
It's all about creating and exploiting mismatches. The ability to shift in and out of the no huddle let's the Packers dictate matchups and attack them giving the defense less opportunity to adjust. That's why it's such a powerful tool in the bag. _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nfldraftguru1 
Joined: 07 Feb 2009 Posts: 8125 Location: eau claire, wi
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Fired-Up wrote: | | Pugger wrote: | We are giving other teams another thing to worry about with Rodgers and company? Sounds like a good idea to me.  |
I'd take execution over confusion. |
No-huddle offenses can still execute very well. It's no-huddle, not hurry-up. Watch Oregon/Houston/Ok St, all very effective no-huddle offenses. _________________
packer backer forever-ker
Packerbacker87's work
| Eastern Walrus wrote: | | just angry sex every night, not because we like to... just because we can and are damn good at it |
Follow me @rcon14 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009 Posts: 6447 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The No-Huddle could be extremely effective against teams with multiple pass rushers. Without the ability substitute in guys, their people on the field will get tired. We aren't switching out OLineman so it levels that advantage that defenses have in getting fresh pass rushers onto the field. And if we somehow catch a team in a run defense when we have a 2WR/2TE/1RB personnel on the field all the better. Imagine going against a run D package with Jennings, Nelson, Finley, Williams, and Green? Awesome. That's easily 5 Wide with a couple motions. And then they can't sub unless they burn a time out. _________________
| ChaRisMa wrote: | | I thought I was the only one adding three inches. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blankman0021 
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1454 Location: MKE
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I Am Rodgers wrote: | | The No-Huddle could be extremely effective against teams with multiple pass rushers. Without the ability substitute in guys, their people on the field will get tired. We aren't switching out OLineman so it levels that advantage that defenses have in getting fresh pass rushers onto the field. And if we somehow catch a team in a run defense when we have a 2WR/2TE/1RB personnel on the field all the better. Imagine going against a run D package with Jennings, Nelson, Finley, Williams, and Green? Awesome. That's easily 5 Wide with a couple motions. And then they can't sub unless they burn a time out. |
The no-huddle in GB has been a few seasons in the making. I'm honestly surprised it isn't already our base offense. _________________
Read More. Post Less. Unless you're on Twitter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
svp 
Joined: 11 Sep 2011 Posts: 636 Location: I took a football shaped pill and felt better.
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Audible right now! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PackerPride
Joined: 27 Dec 2007 Posts: 401
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| wheres this info coming from |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 5716
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Until the league starts penalizing for faking injuries thats how they will stop the no huddle. To use an example, last year when the Giants did the obvious fake injury thing, if the NFL would have suspended those players 8 games each, coaches would think twice about pulling that crap. Also if you go out with an injury you have to sit out the next 5 plays/entire drive instead of 1 play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blankman0021 
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1454 Location: MKE
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | | Until the league starts penalizing for faking injuries thats how they will stop the no huddle. To use an example, last year when the Giants did the obvious fake injury thing, if the NFL would have suspended those players 8 games each, coaches would think twice about pulling that crap. Also if you go out with an injury you have to sit out the next 5 plays/entire drive instead of 1 play. |
I almost forgot about that. You have a point. It is such a circumstantial thing that it is almost impossible to enforce. All a player has to do is say that he got the wind knocked out of him. There are too many injuries that you can stop the play, but won't be able to be proven by a medical professional in any way possible.
I would have liked to have seen those giants players flown into the league office that next day and warned against any future flops. Not that it would necessarily do anything... _________________
Read More. Post Less. Unless you're on Twitter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 8741 Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| blankman0021 wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | Until the league starts penalizing for faking injuries thats how they will stop the no huddle. To use an example, last year when the Giants did the obvious fake injury thing, if the NFL would have suspended those players 8 games each, coaches would think twice about pulling that crap. Also if you go out with an injury you have to sit out the next 5 plays/entire drive instead of 1 play. |
I almost forgot about that. You have a point. It is such a circumstantial thing that it is almost impossible to enforce. All a player has to do is say that he got the wind knocked out of him. There are too many injuries that you can stop the play, but won't be able to be proven by a medical professional in any way possible.
I would have liked to have seen those giants players flown into the league office that next day and warned against any future flops. Not that it would necessarily do anything... |
Easy fix, any injury has to sit out the rest of the series, rather than just 1 play. Teams would be alot more reluctant to sit a starter for a series vs a play. _________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skeet 
Joined: 23 Nov 2008 Posts: 1111 Location: Happy Valley
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| blankman0021 wrote: | | I Am Rodgers wrote: | | The No-Huddle could be extremely effective against teams with multiple pass rushers. Without the ability substitute in guys, their people on the field will get tired. We aren't switching out OLineman so it levels that advantage that defenses have in getting fresh pass rushers onto the field. And if we somehow catch a team in a run defense when we have a 2WR/2TE/1RB personnel on the field all the better. Imagine going against a run D package with Jennings, Nelson, Finley, Williams, and Green? Awesome. That's easily 5 Wide with a couple motions. And then they can't sub unless they burn a time out. |
The no-huddle in GB has been a few seasons in the making. I'm honestly surprised it isn't already our base offense. |
Wasn't this exact same thing said last season? I remember against NO Colinsworth was commenting on how we were running the no huddle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TedThompson 
Joined: 01 Aug 2011 Posts: 802
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I want to go full, fast-break, Lakers Showtime style, no-huddle once the playoffs get here and we can surprise the enemy with the tactic.
Why do I want revenge, in January, on the Giants so bad?
I'm consumed by them. _________________ "It's the same old Jay," Woodson told ESPN afterward. "We just need to be in position. Jay will throw us the ball." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|