| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: Expectations |
 |
|
|
Let's talk production. We'll eventually get into the schedule and team record, but with our first pre-season game only a few days away, gimmie yalls projections for your favorite Lions players.
Stafford
4,600 yards
65% completion percentage
8.9 avg
39 TD's and 13 INT's
Calvin
1,450 yards
16 TD's
over 17 ypr
Titus
1,000 yards
8 TD's
Suh
10 sacks
60 tackles
4 FF's
Avril
12 sacks
5 FF's
Running Game:Running back by committee- 2,000 yards rushing and 900 yards receiving. 13 rushing TD's
Secondary: 25th ranked unit in the NFL. Injuries occur to multiple starters, and QB's up and down our schedule pass for a ton of yards.
Defensive Line: Suh and Avril attain double digit sacks, no other Lions accomplish this feat. Team finishes with 52 total sacks.
OROY: Mikel Leshoure- eligible from not playing a snap in 2011. Attains over 700 yards rushing, and 6 TD's on the ground. 9 Total TD's
DROY:Bill Bently- becomes steal of the draft.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it?
Last edited by stylish313 on Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 30765
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Expectations or predictions? Because the 2 are pretty far apart for me.
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Go_LiOnS
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 2229
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Go_LiOnS wrote: | | wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put. |
This was your expectations thread, remember that???
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=455961
As far as Avril is concerened, he's gonna definitely be splitting more time with Young. 12 sacks would be great from him in that situation, and yes, I'd be fine paying our only perinneal double-digit sack defensive end- and top play-maker.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Expectations or predictions? Because the 2 are pretty far apart for me. |
Semantics again 
I think I was shooting for something in-between, if at all possible.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Go_LiOnS
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 2229
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put. |
This was your expectations thread, remember that???
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=455961
As far as Avril is concerened, he's gonna definitely be splitting more time with Young. 12 sacks would be great from him in that situation, and yes, I'd be fine paying our only perinneal double-digit sack defensive end- and top play-maker. |
i remember. is ther a reason why your showing me tho? if you say so about avril..no way im paying him that, he better never sit.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put. |
This was your expectations thread, remember that???
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=455961
As far as Avril is concerened, he's gonna definitely be splitting more time with Young. 12 sacks would be great from him in that situation, and yes, I'd be fine paying our only perinneal double-digit sack defensive end- and top play-maker. |
i remember. is ther a reason why your showing me tho? if you say so about avril..no way im paying him that, he better never sit. |
Well you said I've come a long way on Stafford, as if I weren't there already now for awhile. I even did whatever it took to get him FFLFKL before last year's season. I know I was originally hard on him, but let's not act suprised as if I just changed my mind- it's been awhile now.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 30765
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put. |
This was your expectations thread, remember that???
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=455961
As far as Avril is concerened, he's gonna definitely be splitting more time with Young. 12 sacks would be great from him in that situation, and yes, I'd be fine paying our only perinneal double-digit sack defensive end- and top play-maker. |
i remember. is ther a reason why your showing me tho? if you say so about avril..no way im paying him that, he better never sit. |
Well you said I've come a long way on Stafford, as if I weren't there already now for awhile. I even did whatever it took to get him FFLFKL before last year's season. I know I was originally hard on him, but let's not act suprised as if I just changed my mind- it's been awhile now. |
The hate is just.....amazing. Absolutely no logic to it. Ready to derail another thread over it. AS IF there is ANY DE that doesn't ever sit 
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Go_LiOnS
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 2229
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stylish313 wrote: | | I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many. |
i was thinking you were one of the people that were saying his accuracy was a problem. he'll be lucky to pass for 50%. only reason i said anything about the 65%
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Go_LiOnS
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 2229
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | wow 65% for stafford huh. guess hes come along way for you. and not to change your topic up but arent you one of them that want to pay avril?? and your ok with that money only equaling 12 sacks...seems low to me. i got a feeling fairley might get close to 10 if used right. willie has a shot to if he sees the snaps. i think injuries bite again as they always do so hard to perdict the D. but with what stafford and all his weapons i say he gets 5000 again if he stays healthy.running game will pretty much be the same...unles leshoure can run over our guys too..i just expect bigger numbers on offence since that has been were most of the focus is put. |
This was your expectations thread, remember that???
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=455961
As far as Avril is concerened, he's gonna definitely be splitting more time with Young. 12 sacks would be great from him in that situation, and yes, I'd be fine paying our only perinneal double-digit sack defensive end- and top play-maker. |
i remember. is ther a reason why your showing me tho? if you say so about avril..no way im paying him that, he better never sit. |
Well you said I've come a long way on Stafford, as if I weren't there already now for awhile. I even did whatever it took to get him FFLFKL before last year's season. I know I was originally hard on him, but let's not act suprised as if I just changed my mind- it's been awhile now. |
The hate is just.....amazing. Absolutely no logic to it. Ready to derail another thread over it. AS IF there is ANY DE that doesn't ever sit |
your right.. I HATE OVERPAYING FOR PLAYERS! i could start but im not gonna mess up dudes thread.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stylish313
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 13782
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many. |
i was thinking you were one of the people that were saying his accuracy was a problem. he'll be lucky to pass for 50%. only reason i said anything about the 65% |
Accuracy is his biggest weakness, but nobody's perfect. He proved he could run our offense with tremendous efficiency, even if he would fly a pass here or there; or throw a few into the dirt.
_________________
Are you getting Ziggy with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
X_Factor_40
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 16149
Location: Hockeytown
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many. |
i was thinking you were one of the people that were saying his accuracy was a problem. he'll be lucky to pass for 50%. only reason i said anything about the 65% |
His career numbers...
2009: 53.3 %
2010: 59.4 %
2011: 63.5 %
With an offseason to work with all of his weapons, and the addition of Broyles and Leshoure coming off injury Stylish should have no problem with his prediction being met if Stafford continues to progress like he should. His prediction seems to be pretty safe to me. Especially if they can establish any sort of a running game this year.
_________________
| Louis Friend wrote: | | How do you rid yourself of character concerns, draft a kid who cures cancer. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Go_LiOnS
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 2229
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| X_Factor_40 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many. |
i was thinking you were one of the people that were saying his accuracy was a problem. he'll be lucky to pass for 50%. only reason i said anything about the 65% |
His career numbers...
2009: 53.3 %
2010: 59.4 %
2011: 63.5 %
With an offseason to work with all of his weapons, and the addition of Broyles and Leshoure coming off injury Stylish should have no problem with his prediction being met if Stafford continues to progress like he should. His prediction seems to be pretty safe to me. Especially if they can establish any sort of a running game this year. |
i have no problem with the perdiction. it almost better be with the weapons hes got and now the chemistry.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DetroitWhat
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 2298
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| X_Factor_40 wrote: | | Go_LiOnS wrote: | | stylish313 wrote: | | I edited in 13 INT's for Stafford. He threw 9 of his 16 INT's the following 3 weeks after he broke his hand against Denver. He appeared to be headed for a single-digit INT season up until that point. I wouldn't be surprised if I predicted too many. |
i was thinking you were one of the people that were saying his accuracy was a problem. he'll be lucky to pass for 50%. only reason i said anything about the 65% |
His career numbers...
2009: 53.3 %
2010: 59.4 %
2011: 63.5 %
With an offseason to work with all of his weapons, and the addition of Broyles and Leshoure coming off injury Stylish should have no problem with his prediction being met if Stafford continues to progress like he should. His prediction seems to be pretty safe to me. Especially if they can establish any sort of a running game this year. |
Man o man if he stayed healthy in 2010 prob throws 35 tds 4000 yards. Just an incredible talent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
