| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mr.MileHigh
Joined: 18 Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Location: Santa Clara CA
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: Denver Broncos Training Camp |
 |
|
|
This is the time where we can see true abilities. That being said who do you think solidifies the DT spots? Siliga may be good now but wait till they have pads to count him in and Moore was extremely good in offseason last year (little that we had) but squandered during game time. I love the dude hope he excels.
Who do you think will as Fox wants will be in the best shape of there lives come Training camp?
Oh and it starts on my 21st Birthday 
As TC starts ill put updates and stuff during my free time
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 4411
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.MileHigh
Joined: 18 Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Location: Santa Clara CA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I guess he was good enough to be a 3rd string last year but we had decent Qb depth. They tried to keep him on the down low.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elliot878
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9507
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mr.MileHigh wrote: |
I guess he was good enough to be a 3rd string last year but we had decent Qb depth. They tried to keep him on the down low. |
Isn't Osweiller still unsigned? That would explain Weber's 2nd team reps, Hanie's garbage lol.
_________________
^Jamison. ^!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.MileHigh
Joined: 18 Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Location: Santa Clara CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| elliot878 wrote: | | Mr.MileHigh wrote: |
I guess he was good enough to be a 3rd string last year but we had decent Qb depth. They tried to keep him on the down low. |
Isn't Osweiller still unsigned? That would explain Weber's 2nd team reps, Hanie's garbage lol. |
That's right! I totally forgot about Osweiler not having a contract. Hillman too. What are they fighting over 15-20k?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JerseysFinest27
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 5985
Location: New Jersey... Props to inDENguise on the sig
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mr.MileHigh wrote: | | elliot878 wrote: | | Mr.MileHigh wrote: |
I guess he was good enough to be a 3rd string last year but we had decent Qb depth. They tried to keep him on the down low. |
Isn't Osweiller still unsigned? That would explain Weber's 2nd team reps, Hanie's garbage lol. |
That's right! I totally forgot about Osweiler not having a contract. Hillman too. What are they fighting over 15-20k? |
Theyre fighting over a guaranteed year. Both are fighting to keep the last year of their deal, fully guaranteed.
_________________
Stop slobbering over Lance Ball. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.MileHigh
Joined: 18 Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Location: Santa Clara CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well that is understandable. Wolfe got a pretty good deal so maybe he will be a example to get it done but I'm sure its nothing to worry about
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elliot878
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9507
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mr.MileHigh wrote: | | Well that is understandable. Wolfe got a pretty good deal so maybe he will be a example to get it done but I'm sure its nothing to worry about |
this is a franchise with a solid history of signing the rookies before training camp begins. The deals will get done before training camp.
_________________
^Jamison. ^!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 4411
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Donut
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 11476
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of the logic of Moreno is hurt so he just falls to bottom of the depth chart. Hillman is safe but I wouldnt have him on the depth chart until he earns it. Worst case they put him on the PUP
Stokely imo is just in for TC and wont make the team.
But from basis of it is where lack of competition your a winner(Vickerson, Bannan). Where there is some your a loser in it(Thomas, Harris). If you had a negative headline you lose(Warren, DJ). Or is you have a positive one or another position player did something dumb(Bolden, Vickerson, Woodyard).
| elliot878 wrote: | | Mr.MileHigh wrote: | | Well that is understandable. Wolfe got a pretty good deal so maybe he will be a example to get it done but I'm sure its nothing to worry about |
this is a franchise with a solid history of signing the rookies before training camp begins. The deals will get done before training camp. |
Most teams usually get them done before hand. Its more rare to not get them all signed(Russell and Watson are 2 I can think of in recent yrs(though w/ rookie scale for 1sts shouldnt be as much of a problem)). Also 2nd rounders usually are never a problem.
_________________
| dhunt2402 wrote: | You're like the patron saint of roster bubble players  |
Adopt a Patriot: Ras I Dowling |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jsthomp2007
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 6226
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I wonder how we can predict that Stokely won't make the team. Him and Tamme are the only two receivers that have any experience working with Manning. I think that actually makes them a shoe in to make the team.
I would love it if Stoke made the team.
_________________
Ninja stealth muggers in the Bellagio has left me in a state of congitive disonance... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 4411
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jsthomp2007 wrote: | I wonder how we can predict that Stokely won't make the team. Him and Tamme are the only two receivers that have any experience working with Manning. I think that actually makes them a shoe in to make the team.
I would love it if Stoke made the team. |
I'm with you jst, I think Stoke makes it and barring injury is a solid contributer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.MileHigh
Joined: 18 Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Location: Santa Clara CA
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The winner/loser article is ridiculous we can't tell who is gonna be cut or not before TC. Vickerson gained 50 pounds so now he is a starter? Harris is a Loser because we signed Florence? Idk in my opinion its irrelevant
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
broncos67
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 18132
Location: Capitol Cit-ay
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AKRNA wrote: | | jsthomp2007 wrote: | I wonder how we can predict that Stokely won't make the team. Him and Tamme are the only two receivers that have any experience working with Manning. I think that actually makes them a shoe in to make the team.
I would love it if Stoke made the team. |
I'm with you jst, I think Stoke makes it and barring injury is a solid contributer. |
I don't think a receiver nearing 40 who has clearly been less productive as time has gone on is a "shoe-in" to make the team.
Thomas, Decker, Caldwell, Willis, Hill, Page are my actual guesses to make the team. I think the first four are safe, and Hill's deep speed may make him an asset with a QB who knows how to throw the ball. Page will likely make this team in some capacity.
_________________
Thanks, Tzimisce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AKRNA
Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 4411
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| broncos67 wrote: | | AKRNA wrote: | | jsthomp2007 wrote: | I wonder how we can predict that Stokely won't make the team. Him and Tamme are the only two receivers that have any experience working with Manning. I think that actually makes them a shoe in to make the team.
I would love it if Stoke made the team. |
I'm with you jst, I think Stoke makes it and barring injury is a solid contributer. |
I don't think a receiver nearing 40 who has clearly been less productive as time has gone on is a "shoe-in" to make the team.
Thomas, Decker, Caldwell, Willis, Hill, Page are my actual guesses to make the team. I think the first four are safe, and Hill's deep speed may make him an asset with a QB who knows how to throw the ball. Page will likely make this team in some capacity. |
I've got to disagree. I think Willis will be gone. Marginal at best WR and average at best on ST. Bolden should replace him as a gunner. Hill, eh, I don't see much there either.
personally, I'd prefer a 35 yo slot receiver (a very effective, sure handed slot receiver and a history with PM) even in decline than either 27/8 yo WR's that have never done much at all.
Stokely, in a limited role could have a definite positive impact this year. Great 3rd down guy. I can't really say the same about Willis or Hill.
I do agree with your 1st three though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
