| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ProudHorn
Joined: 07 May 2008 Posts: 8708
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: How Safe Are Rick Spielman and Leslie Frazier? |
|
|
|
It's been reported that 2012 is that last guaranteed year remaining on Frazier's contract, with an option for 2013. And it's the same situation for Spielman. So, what kind of success does this team need to achieve for these guys to keep their job? Or doesn't it matter?
Personally, barring a 2009-esque season, I don't see any reasonable amount of improvement enough for Spielman and Frazier to remain in Minnesota. I can't help but think that the only reason that Rick Spielman was "promoted" to General Manager and Leslie Frazier was kept as Head Coach was a money saving tactic by Zygi Wilf, with the stadium effort still in limbo. Why spend big money on a big time front office executive and more money and a long contract on a new head coach, if you might be moving in a year, not to mention, which top level candidates would come to Minnesota with the possibility of having to move and uproot your family once again.
So even if the Vikings finish the 2012 season 6-10 to 8-8, a mark that most fans would consider a successful year, I see the Vikings finding new leadership going into 2013.
Thought? _________________
| Quote: | | DISCLAIMER: I am not a sports agent, a player, a coach, or an NFL front office executive and I don't play one on TV. So basically, there's a good chance I'm full of BS, but maybe not... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikings209
Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 1186 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Spielman is safer than Frazier. Especially after that draft we had which Spielman has gotten high praise for. If we could get one or two of the players we signed to step up and contribute right away we can be a competitive team this year, maybe not a winning team but at very competitive. If Frazier shows that he has us moving in the right direction I think that the Wilfs will pick up his option and give him another"show me year" to see if he complete the rebuilding process next year. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[UMN] 
Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 11823 Location: Desolation Row
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If we go 6 wins or less (90% chance we will), Frazier is gone, and Spielman will be given free reign to pick his new coach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
El Raymundo 
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 5045 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I have nothing to base this statement on other than sniffing glue in my basement, but it seems to me that the Wilfs would like to build a franchise modeled after the Giants and Steelers. Neither of those franchises, especially the Steelers, is a "churn" organization. Look at Bill Cowher: the front office stuck with him through a lot of thin before the thick and they were rewarded for it. While Zygi has given two coaches their walking papers in the short time he's owned the team, it bears keeping in mind that one was let go after presiding over a hugely embarrassing incident (the Love Boat) and the second was let go when he clearly lost both control of the locker room and his marbles. Neither, to me, strikes me as "churn" types of moves. I think as long as Frazier and Spielman continue to behave with integrity and professionalism, that both will be given adequate chance to build and manage the team. Zygi just doesn't strike me as a man with a quick trigger finger in terms of the front office of his football team - unless he is embarrassed. _________________
"Live as brave men; and if Fortune is adverse, front its blows with brave hearts." -- Cicero |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39482 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Spielman is 100% safe after this year, what would the purpose of hiring him as the GM for one season and then cutting your losses. If Wilf had any reservations about Spielman, he wouldnt have promoted him to GM. So Spielman isnt going anywhere.
If the team is picking top 10 again, Frazier should be considered as good as gone. Spielman will then get to hand pick his own coaches and hopefully implement the necessary scheme changes to get this team turned around. Though I would like to keep Musgrave, I think his offense works for today's NFL. He just needs a QB to drive it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PrplChilPill
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 7801 Location: SLP, MN
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
El Ray has a great point....frankly, if it was me, Frazier would already be gone. I'm not a fan at all.....but I'm not the Wilfs.
Spielman is 100% safe, imo. Frazier has to win at least 5 games, I think, to survive. But, El Ray may be right, if Spielman has Frazier's back, I think he's safe barring a complete collapse. If Spielman wants a different coach, and they are like last year, I think Frazier's gone, though. _________________ Wins are a team stat, not a QB stat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39482 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PrplChilPill wrote: | El Ray has a great point....frankly, if it was me, Frazier would already be gone. I'm not a fan at all.....but I'm not the Wilfs.
Spielman is 100% safe, imo. Frazier has to win at least 5 games, I think, to survive. But, El Ray may be right, if Spielman has Frazier's back, I think he's safe barring a complete collapse. If Spielman wants a different coach, and they are like last year, I think Frazier's gone, though. |
I think this year's Vikings team has enough talent to be a 7-9 win team if the team doesnt have significant injuries and even if Ponder plays wildly inconsistent from week to week (take the good with the bad). Anything less than 6 wins is on the coaching as far as I am concerned, and that starts with Frazier. So anything less than 7-9, Frazier needs to be fired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kellerman 
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 3169 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Frazier did build a legit top-5 defense when he was the coordinator. The guy can obviously coach. I haven't lost all faith yet in Leslie, but this year is make or break for him. _________________
sig by Jamison
#97 Everson Griffin: 0 tackles : 0 sacks : 0 FF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39482 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kellerman wrote: | | Frazier did build a legit top-5 defense when he was the coordinator. The guy can obviously coach. I haven't lost all faith yet in Leslie, but this year is make or break for him. |
But he did so as the defensive coordinator. Coaching as a DC vs a HC are completely different. Frazier as the HC, spends far less time coaching than he does managing the team, putting together game plans, etc.. Frazier is a good defensive coach, but as a head coach, I havent seen anything to suggest that he can handle the duties required of being a HC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SteelKing728 
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 10863 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Spielman has more room than Frazier.
Its hard to say. I wouldn't be happy with just an 8-8 record (even though thats what I'm prediciting), I see that as a successful year for us, considering all the trouble we have gone through the past 2 seasons.
8-8 or better, Frazier keeps his job.
6-10 to 7-9, Spielman thinks hard over it.
5-11 or worse, Frazier is canned.
The pressure is on! _________________
Thanks Jamison on that avi.
2013 Adopt a Minnesota Viking - Jared Allen - DE - #69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HighHopes 
 Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 25268 Location: Courtroom
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Frazier is on a similar path as Ponder. I dont think they have these set wins type things. But they have to prove they are improving. If we only win 5 games, but we have another 5 games that were very competitive and just lost to good play, I dont see why he should be canned. _________________ XBL/PSN: Chainedsniper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
milanb 
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 5167 Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | Spielman is 100% safe after this year, what would the purpose of hiring him as the GM for one season and then cutting your losses. If Wilf had any reservations about Spielman, he wouldnt have promoted him to GM. So Spielman isnt going anywhere.
If the team is picking top 10 again, Frazier should be considered as good as gone. Spielman will then get to hand pick his own coaches and hopefully implement the necessary scheme changes to get this team turned around. Though I would like to keep Musgrave, I think his offense works for today's NFL. He just needs a QB to drive it. |
OK, but when does Spielman start becoming held accountable for this team's dearth of talent?
Spielman may be new as the official GM, but he was VP Player Personnel for the previous five years. He had a rather mediocre stint in the same job in Miami before that. If the team hasn't drafted well why does it not fall on Spielman? I don't see why the HC should take all the blame while Spielman gets a free ride.
The bigger issue is this: with rare exceptions, in the NFL the Head Coach answers directly to the ownership. I would be shocked if anyone in the Vikings organization other than Zygi himself has the power to fire Frazier. If Zygi does decide to can Frazier, no one worth hiring as HC will (a) agree to answer to Spielman or (b) agree to keep Christian Ponder as starting QB. We would almost certainly be looking at a complete house cleaning. _________________
The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. — Ecclesiastes 9:11
But that’s the way to bet. — Jimmy The Greek
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39482 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| milanb wrote: | | vikingsrule wrote: | Spielman is 100% safe after this year, what would the purpose of hiring him as the GM for one season and then cutting your losses. If Wilf had any reservations about Spielman, he wouldnt have promoted him to GM. So Spielman isnt going anywhere.
If the team is picking top 10 again, Frazier should be considered as good as gone. Spielman will then get to hand pick his own coaches and hopefully implement the necessary scheme changes to get this team turned around. Though I would like to keep Musgrave, I think his offense works for today's NFL. He just needs a QB to drive it. |
OK, but when does Spielman start becoming held accountable for this team's dearth of talent?
Spielman may be new as the official GM, but he was VP Player Personnel for the previous five years. He had a rather mediocre stint in the same job in Miami before that. If the team hasn't drafted well why does it not fall on Spielman? I don't see why the HC should take all the blame while Spielman gets a free ride.
The bigger issue is this: with rare exceptions, in the NFL the Head Coach answers directly to the ownership. I would be shocked if anyone in the Vikings organization other than Zygi himself has the power to fire Frazier. If Zygi does decide to can Frazier, no one worth hiring as HC will (a) agree to answer to Spielman or (b) agree to keep Christian Ponder as starting QB. We would almost certainly be looking at a complete house cleaning. |
Possibly, but why would Wilf even promote Spielman than. Why not just wait it out to see what Frazier becomes. I think its because Wilf atleast has faith in Spielman as a GM. The Vikes have to clean house regardless, and that job has been put on Spielman. If Spielman cant turn it around in 2-4 years, than his job will be on the line. But it wont be next year. If Spielman/Wilf determine that Frazier just isnt right for the job, they will part ways. Sure the team could be looking for a new QB but why is there so much angst or resentment against that? If a better QB prospect becomes available, there should be nothing wrong with taking that player. Surely a new HC will likely want their QB, their system, etc, and it will be Spielman's job to provide that coach with the pieces necessary to make it work.
Sure, Frazier may answer to Wilf, but if there is a vacancy, Spielman will probably play a substantial role in the head coach recruiting process.
The way I see it is Spielman has atleast 2-3 years to show he can manage the roster, but Frazier is basically a year-to-year head coach. There just needs to be some steady progression, this team isnt as talent deprived as people want to make out. Its up to the coaches to maximize that talent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PrplChilPill
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 7801 Location: SLP, MN
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The question wasn't in our opinion though, right? It was what do we think the organization will do.....
I'd fire Frazier right now, but that's not going to happen. I'd let Spielman know that I thought his decisions were awful in most drafts, and that if things don't get better, he's gone. But then, I'm pretty big on accountability for performance. Neither Frazier nor Spielman have shown that they are really good at their jobs. Frankly, Frazier so far has shown to be an awful head coach, strategically, tactically, and long term thinking wise. I'm not sure how he still has a job. _________________ Wins are a team stat, not a QB stat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
milanb 
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 5167 Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: |
Possibly, but why would Wilf even promote Spielman than.
|
Who knows?
It could be one of those things where Spielman now no longer has any excuses if some the players he drafted over the years don't start performing soon.
Anyway, my point was: if Frazier is fired, who's going to want to step into this situation? Even if Spielman is on firmer ground with Zygi than is Frazier, it may not matter. _________________
The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. — Ecclesiastes 9:11
But that’s the way to bet. — Jimmy The Greek
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|