| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 753
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RamRod
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 10442
Location: Virginia
|
 Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 5:48 pm Post subject: Re: Fish wants to break the sack record |
 |
|
|
| ajhicks11 wrote: | | What do you think the chances actually are that the Rams do this? |
NOT going to happen. 0%.
When the Bears set the record the game was different back then. Now, teams put so much in to protecting the QB and the QBs get rid of the ball faster.
We had 39 sacks last year. Yes, we did make some upgrades across the line but I doubt the production will sky rocket that much.
Also, the team with the most sacks last year had 50 and teams rarely even get into the 60s now, and to get into the 70s is insane.
I think Fisher knows how unlikely it is, he's just trying to motivate them or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 753
|
| Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 7:33 pm Post subject: Re: Fish wants to break the sack record |
|
|
|
| RamRod wrote: | | ajhicks11 wrote: | | What do you think the chances actually are that the Rams do this? |
NOT going to happen. 0%.
When the Bears set the record the game was different back then. Now, teams put so much in to protecting the QB and the QBs get rid of the ball faster.
We had 39 sacks last year. Yes, we did make some upgrades across the line but I doubt the production will sky rocket that much.
Also, the team with the most sacks last year had 50 and teams rarely even get into the 60s now, and to get into the 70s is insane.
I think Fisher knows how unlikely it is, he's just trying to motivate them or something. |
Thanks for the reply. I wasn't exactly sure how likely it would be to happen. With the amount of quality corners we have (if they are and stay healthy) we will be able to put even more pressure on.
_________________
GO RAMS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 68966
|
| Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd rather them set their sights high and come up just short than set their sights low and come up just short. It's possible but extremely difficult. Here's basically what we would be looking at:
Long - 15
Quinn - 13
Langford - 8.5
Brockers - 4
Laurinaitis - 5.5
Stewart - 3
Mikell - 3
Finnegan - 2
Jenkins - 2
Sims - 6
Hayes - 4
Dunbar - 3
Laws - 2
Haggans/other starting OLB - 2
That's 73 sacks. So while not impossible, I'd say EXTREMELY unlikely.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 753
|
| Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | I'd rather them set their sights high and come up just short than set their sights low and come up just short. It's possible but extremely difficult. Here's basically what we would be looking at:
Long - 15
Quinn - 13
Langford - 8.5
Brockers - 4
Laurinaitis - 5.5
Stewart - 3
Mikell - 3
Finnegan - 2
Jenkins - 2
Sims - 6
Hayes - 4
Dunbar - 3
Laws - 2
Haggans/other starting OLB - 2
That's 73 sacks. So while not impossible, I'd say EXTREMELY unlikely. |
Looks to be very unlikely, although it would be so cool to watch happen. I'm excited for how this defense is shaping up!
_________________
GO RAMS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RamRod
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 10442
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Bears also made the NFC Championship game that year. We are not on that level yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wr80
Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 494
|
| Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Have dreams they may not come true but lets work for something I love this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CalifornianRam
Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 470
Location: Porterville, California
|
| Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i think every other play some one on the D is going to shout FIRE! FIRE! FIRE! i hope we kill alex smith this season with the sacks. it'll get to him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
