| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jamison.
Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 7413
Location: no
|
 Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 10:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| ianlewis16 wrote: | | KhanYouDigIt wrote: | | ianlewis16 wrote: | | NYGFan101 wrote: | Any QB that is scared in the pocket will not succeed in the NFL.
You can't teach that. He will never amount to anything in the NFL and I fully expect him to be out of the NFL in three years. |
have you even seen the dude's hair bro?
he's destined for greatness |
He cut it off. |
scrub |
lmao.
_________________
Jamison.'s Gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15124
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
ITT: We act like bad pocket presence automatically means a QB is scared.
_________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawgtx
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 1839
Location: Clear Lake/Houston
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | ITT: We act like bad pocket presence automatically means a QB is scared. |
See...I don't think so?!
We act like bad pocket presence is automatically means a less than desirable quarterback?!
_________________
Texans Nation-The Revolutionis "SMOKkkinn"!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15124
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dawgtx wrote: | | Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | ITT: We act like bad pocket presence automatically means a QB is scared. |
See...I don't think so?!
We act like bad pocket presence is automatically means a less than desirable quarterback?! |
I'm not completely sure what you just said. If my decoder ring is working though... it has absolutely nothing to do with what I just said.
_________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FakingInjuries
Joined: 06 Feb 2012
Posts: 261
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dhunt2402
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 16677
Location: The District
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I really don't think so. Hopefully he does, I've always liked the Jags, but I never saw it in him as a prospect, so even with all these weapons I dont think he'll do much.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BillsGuy82
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 6650
Location: Niagara Falls
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| No Gabbert was a bad pick and thank the holy heavens (and the Broncos) Dareus was there at 3 because he would have been the epic failure pick Bills fans have been crushed by, and not getting Locker is gonna haunt them until at least 2016. Heck I even like Lockers "toys" more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Its A Sabotage
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 28138
Location: Do. Your. Job.
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Deal, SuperBowl here we comez.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | Sabo is the best poster on FF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7255
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Kyle Boller's career > Blaine Gabbert's
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FakingInjuries
Joined: 06 Feb 2012
Posts: 261
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | | FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Deal, SuperBowl here we comez. |
boller never took his team to a Super Bowl
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iPwn
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35483
Location: Stand United
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | | Its A Sabotage wrote: | | FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Deal, SuperBowl here we comez. |
boller never took his team to a Super Bowl |
Don't get hung up on technicalities.
_________________
 | samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajdodge09
Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 4009
Location: Jobland looking for jobbies.
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9161
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Kyle Boller's career > Blaine Gabbert's |
I'd like to think someone who is the NFL for like 9 years has a better career than a rookie...
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7255
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | FakingInjuries wrote: | Blaine Gabbert is the next Kyle Boller
In my opinion |
Kyle Boller's career > Blaine Gabbert's |
I'd like to think someone who is the NFL for like 9 years has a better career than a rookie... |
I realize how the post would be misleading but it was intended for when it's all said and done.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
