| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JETSFOOTBALL25
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 941
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: Cimini trying to make us the laughing stock of draft. |
 |
|
|
When the Seattle picking Bruce Irvin at 15 everyone hated the pick. I was a bad pick. Irvin a second rounder taken in the middle of the first round.
Cimini posted an article on ESPNny saying how WE wanted to taken Irvin at 16 and that Seattle knew that because they were planning on trading out. This pick would have made us the laughing stock of draft and not Seattle.
Another Cimini Jets bashing article. Can't stand this guy, he needs to get a job covering another team
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/jets/post/_/id/12243/report-jets-wanted-irvin-not-coples |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davey
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 20701
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Conflicting reports. Manish Mehta who is also very reliable said this was untrue, and the Jets had no interest in taking Irvin or even Ingram, Jones or Mercilus at 16th overall because the Jets didn't value them as top 15/16 players. According to him, it was going to be DeCastro if Coples was unavailable. This report makes more sense as the Jets obviously did not take a OLB prospect having their choice of basically all of them, and with the amount of time used for the pick were probably trying to move down.
Bassett on the jets blog made a nice post about the whole thing here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26571
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Davey wrote: | Conflicting reports. Manish Mehta who is also very reliable said this was untrue, and the Jets had no interest in taking Irvin or even Ingram, Jones or Mercilus at 16th overall because the Jets didn't value them as top 15/16 players. According to him, it was going to be DeCastro if Coples was unavailable. This report makes more sense as the Jets obviously did not take a OLB prospect having their choice of basically all of them, and with the amount of time used for the pick were probably trying to move down.
Bassett on the jets blog made a nice post about the whole thing here. |
I wanted us to take DeCastro with that pick. 
I think that if Brockers was available at 16, we would have taken him over Coples.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teamorange
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 7050
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| honestly, Irvin may be the best pass rusher in this draft. He is no where near an every down player. I was really hoping he would slide to the 2nd round and we would trade up for him |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jamison.
Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 7413
Location: no
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why get worked up over what Cimini says. Who cares?  It's irrelevant now.
_________________
Jamison.'s Gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jetsfandan423
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 13314
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't doubt that they would have considered taking him along with Coples, DeCastro, and whoever else they had ranked on the big board. They Jets did take almost all their time, so that tells me they tried to trade down and/or had a discussion as to who to take at that spot if they didn't find a trading partner.
_________________
Props to NS922 and JMG on the sweet sig!
GT - DecimatorDan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NY_Jets87
Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 3909
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
he did the same thing when we traded for Tebow. First we werent spedning enough money on Drew Stanton. Then we were paying too much for a back up in Tebow. The guy is an [inappropriate/removed] clown.
_________________
Mack on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockice_8
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 1484
Location: Unknown
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We already have Bruce Irvin we call him Mayhem and it didn't cost us the #15 pick.
Mayhem for free and Coples at #16 or Bruce Irvin at #16? I'll take the first one.
Honestly the only time I read Cimini now is when I start to get to excited for a Jets move or something. I guess you could say he keeps me level headed cause "Negative Nancy" always has something nice to say about how the Jets blew this or screwed up that.
_________________
Receiving
Rec - 56, Yds - 827, Avg - 14.8, Lng - 66, TD - 2
Props to Jamison on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IvyLeague
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Davey wrote: | Conflicting reports. Manish Mehta who is also very reliable said this was untrue, and the Jets had no interest in taking Irvin or even Ingram, Jones or Mercilus at 16th overall because the Jets didn't value them as top 15/16 players. According to him, it was going to be DeCastro if Coples was unavailable. This report makes more sense as the Jets obviously did not take a OLB prospect having their choice of basically all of them, and with the amount of time used for the pick were probably trying to move down.
Bassett on the jets blog made a nice post about the whole thing here. |
I wanted us to take DeCastro with that pick.
I think that if Brockers was available at 16, we would have taken him over Coples. |
I doubt it. Would have been a terrible move imo. Brockers is a tremendous run stuffer but leaves a lot to be desired as a pass rusher. He's no where near the athlete Coples is either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26571
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IvyLeague wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Davey wrote: | Conflicting reports. Manish Mehta who is also very reliable said this was untrue, and the Jets had no interest in taking Irvin or even Ingram, Jones or Mercilus at 16th overall because the Jets didn't value them as top 15/16 players. According to him, it was going to be DeCastro if Coples was unavailable. This report makes more sense as the Jets obviously did not take a OLB prospect having their choice of basically all of them, and with the amount of time used for the pick were probably trying to move down.
Bassett on the jets blog made a nice post about the whole thing here. |
I wanted us to take DeCastro with that pick.
I think that if Brockers was available at 16, we would have taken him over Coples. |
I doubt it. Would have been a terrible move imo. Brockers is a tremendous run stuffer but leaves a lot to be desired as a pass rusher. He's no where near the athlete Coples is either. |
I would not have been in favor of the pick, but the Jets appeared to have a lot of interest in him.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KBS756
Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3150
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | IvyLeague wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Davey wrote: | Conflicting reports. Manish Mehta who is also very reliable said this was untrue, and the Jets had no interest in taking Irvin or even Ingram, Jones or Mercilus at 16th overall because the Jets didn't value them as top 15/16 players. According to him, it was going to be DeCastro if Coples was unavailable. This report makes more sense as the Jets obviously did not take a OLB prospect having their choice of basically all of them, and with the amount of time used for the pick were probably trying to move down.
Bassett on the jets blog made a nice post about the whole thing here. |
I wanted us to take DeCastro with that pick.
I think that if Brockers was available at 16, we would have taken him over Coples. |
I doubt it. Would have been a terrible move imo. Brockers is a tremendous run stuffer but leaves a lot to be desired as a pass rusher. He's no where near the athlete Coples is either. |
I would not have been in favor of the pick, but the Jets appeared to have a lot of interest in him. |
I think Coples would have been our guy over Brockers but not over Fletcher Cox.
I feel like we did have interest in Bruce Irvin though but later on in the draft probably trading back into the 2nd. Believe Rex said Irvin was after Coples and Hill on their board. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FakingInjuries
Joined: 06 Feb 2012
Posts: 255
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rex Ryan made you a laughing stock a long time ago with his foot fetish expose
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jetsfandan423
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 13314
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | | Rex Ryan made you a laughing stock a long time ago with his foot fetish expose |
And we can say something similar about BB and Spygate.
_________________
Props to NS922 and JMG on the sweet sig!
GT - DecimatorDan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KBS756
Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3150
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | | Rex Ryan made you a laughing stock a long time ago with his foot fetish expose |
At least that had nothing to do with football unlike Spy Gate which is a permanent stain on New England's Football Legacy
anyway back on topic ... Cimini just seems to like stirring up controversy... we prob did want Irvin late tho (like late 2nd) since he is one of the best pure pass rushers in this draft but not much in any other facet of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NY_Jets87
Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 3909
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FakingInjuries wrote: | | Rex Ryan made you a laughing stock a long time ago with his foot fetish expose |
Wow. Troller.
_________________
Mack on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
