| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dawgdish
Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Posts: 2238
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:45 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
If we get Hill or Randle at 37 than this draft is a-ok in my book. An instantly reshaped offense, which is what we needed. Lots of Browns fans lamenting the Weeden pick, but I think H&H are really convinced that he can be the guy, and they know more than all of us combined. They put their own nuts on the chopping block with this pick, so you have to give them credit for that.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff  |
MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pmk wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: |
No...what is that..... 
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
No need to play frogger with a franchise QB. If you think he's the guy, you take him where he is good value on your board (must have been at least top 18 on the Brown's board). The drop off at OT/WR/CB/etc. from 22 to 37 is going to be much less than the dropoff in the QBs after Weeden. |
Common sense does not belong in this thread.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bonanza23
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 5408
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Onizuka wrote: | | Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
Ever heard of a trade up? |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
Simmer down dude  Just sayin maybe they were hearing somebody was going to move up. Maybe they tried to trade down and got no takers.
Or if they really wanted him, why risk somebody taking him? Same thing applied to them trading 1 spot to get T-rich. Why risk not getting who you want.
I suppose all I'm saying is we have no clue what went on last night. But my best guess is they really liked Weeden and took him where they absolutely knew they could get him. In fact I've read rumors where he had Weeden ranked 13th on their board. If that's the case they got a steal.
_________________
Thanks to ReggieCamp on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poorbytehshore
Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 1400
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Heckert: "There were some teams that we know were interested behind us, so we just decided to go ahead and pick him."
Unless they are lying, they had reason to believe there was a chance that Weeden would not make it to 37. As said, with someone you believe can be a Franchise QB, there's no point in the risk. Just take him if you like him. If he turns out how you think, he will be a steal at 22. We can go get a WR at 37 now that most would probably have been ok with at 22, i.e. Stephen Hill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Onizuka
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 653
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | pmk wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
No need to play frogger with a franchise QB. If you think he's the guy, you take him where he is good value on your board (must have been at least top 18 on the Brown's board). The drop off at OT/WR/CB/etc. from 22 to 37 is going to be much less than the dropoff in the QBs after Weeden. |
Common sense does not belong in this thread. |
Oh I forgot this wasn't a discussion board....obviously those of us that even dare state a difference of opinion to the mass have no idea what we are talking about
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker. |
I'll agree that maybe they didn't rate those guys as high as they had Weeden....but again...this is a discussion board....maybe you should just go sit with friends that agree with everything you say...that way you have no fears of someone disagreeing or having a difference of opinion |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Onizuka
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 653
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
Ever heard of a trade up? |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
Simmer down dude Just sayin maybe they were hearing somebody was going to move up. Maybe they tried to trade down and got no takers.
Or if they really wanted him, why risk somebody taking him? Same thing applied to them trading 1 spot to get T-rich. Why risk not getting who you want.
I suppose all I'm saying is we have no clue what went on last night. But my best guess is they really liked Weeden and took him where they absolutely knew they could get him. In fact I've read rumors where he had Weeden ranked 13th on their board. If that's the case they got a steal. |
I think this is the perfect answer...I just have no idea who would trade up to pick Weeden before us....
Thanks for answering without the "OMG no common sense" response.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 12075
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
What he brings: Weeden is accurate and can get the ball out of his hands quickly, plus he has a very strong arm. However, there are concerns about his ability to make sound decisions under pressure. He has to improve his ability to beat the blitz. His age (2 is a concern, but it's not a significant red flag. If he starts early in his career, they can still get six or seven years of quality football out of him.
How he fits: He certainly looks like the QB of the future
^ espn's write up.
If this guy puts up Tony Romo #'s for 6-7 years, no one can be mad about this.
If we stuck with Colt, we would have won 4-5 games again this year and this city would burn.
This dude gives us an ACTUAL chance in every game.
Our defense is pretty good and now we have an actual QB and a monster in the running game.
If we get him a good WR in the 2nd and a RT in the 3rd or 4th, our offense will be SO much better than last year.
I understand he's old and most think he would have been there at 37, but other guys that we thought would be gone by now are still here.
What's the difference between Glenn, Hill, Randle at 22 and Weeden at 37 compared to Weeden at 22 and one of those 3 at 37? There is none.
People need to step back from the ledge.
Sorry i was angry posting at people last night, i was drunk and pissed about how everyone was freaking out. 
_________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Onizuka wrote: | | Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
Ever heard of a trade up? |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
Who the hell knows what team would have? You can't guarantee anything in the draft.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | pmk wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
No need to play frogger with a franchise QB. If you think he's the guy, you take him where he is good value on your board (must have been at least top 18 on the Brown's board). The drop off at OT/WR/CB/etc. from 22 to 37 is going to be much less than the dropoff in the QBs after Weeden. |
Common sense does not belong in this thread. |
Oh I forgot this wasn't a discussion board....obviously those of us that even dare state a difference of opinion to the mass have no idea what we are talking about
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker. |
I'll agree that maybe they didn't rate those guys as high as they had Weeden....but again...this is a discussion board....maybe you should just go sit with friends that agree with everything you say...that way you have no fears of someone disagreeing or having a difference of opinion |
Well ripping apart Weeden is the sexy thing to do in this thread. all I'm trying to do is plug in a little something positive. Sue me.
Everyone is all about drafting Decastro. Why? We have a friggin LG. Thats what I don't understand. They wanted their QB and they got him, just like they wanted their RB and made sure they got him. Who cares if it was 10 picks too early?
Argue that point if he busts. Have a little confidence in the front office for once.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Onizuka
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 653
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
Ever heard of a trade up? |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
Who the hell knows what team would have? You can't guarantee anything in the draft. |
Yes I know...I just couldn't see any team really wanting Weeden bad enough to take him in the 1st or to jump us in the 2nd...most teams have QBs in place either from FA, last year's draft, or the 3 QBs that were already picked this year...
My only reasoning on why I thought Weeden would of been available....though someone did throw in the Chiefs might of been interested... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | Bonanza23 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
Ever heard of a trade up? |
No...what is that.....
Does that also work like where the Browns could of traded back into the 1st or even trade spots with say the Ravens or Broncos for some later picks to grab Weeden?
I don't get how those that are alright with the pick of Weeden at #22 are angry at us for those that perferred that the FO risk the chance at Weeden at #37 or traded spots with one of the earlier picks in round 2 to grab him...
Also which team, that would most likely need a starting QB, would of traded more picks to move back up into the 1st or early round 2 to be ahead of the Browns just to grab Weeden? |
Who the hell knows what team would have? You can't guarantee anything in the draft. |
Yes I know...I just couldn't see any team really wanting Weeden bad enough to take him in the 1st or to jump us in the 2nd...most teams have QBs in place either from FA, last year's draft, or the 3 QBs that were picked this year...
My only reasoning on why I thought Weeden would of been available....though someone did throw in the Chiefs might of been interested... |
That's possible. Its really tough to judge who would have and wouldn't have been interested. I agree that it doesn't seem like anyone would have, but nobody knows 100%.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bungleodeon
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 7877
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker. |
They also said they liked McCoy moving forward. Who cares?
_________________
Adopt-a-Brown: Jabaal Sheard - Stats:
2011: 55 Tackles - 8.5 Sacks - 5 FF - 1 FR - 2 PD - 7 STF
2012: 54 Tackles - 7 Sacks - 1 FF - 3 PD - 2 STF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fsubrowns9510
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 12520
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bungleodeon wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker. |
They also said they liked McCoy moving forward. Who cares? |
LG and QB are 2 totally different stories.
_________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bungleodeon
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 7877
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bungleodeon wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | Onizuka wrote: | | fsubrowns9510 wrote: | | bigdogsandiego wrote: | | Heckert could be betting his job on this selection and I hope he is right. Like others mentioned, he was surely available at 37. Will there be any QB controversy? Will Chilly be able to quickly mold Weeden? What do we do with Colt and Wallace? Are they going to pick up McNabb to tutor? We could of got Tebow for a 4th. We could have traded down to NE and got two good picks(Smith S, and Osemele RT). |
Heh?
Yea rip Weeden and embrace Tim Tebow as a QB in the same paragraph. LOL.
Nobody knows if he was going to be there at 37. Did anyone expect Irvin to go top 15? Yea right. Its likely he was going to, but who freaking knows. |
Um...I'll agree that there is no 100% gurantee that he would of been there at 37...but look at the teams that picked after us and who they targeted...please convince me they would of taken Weeden in the 1st round....and now look at round 2 and who picks before us...again convince me that they would target Weeden with a high 2nd round pick...
Most of us that are angry about the pick just hate the fact that we could of grabbed Decastro or Reiff or even Hill if we wanted to and get Weeden at 37....but they went with Weeden and we missed out on Decastro or Reiff |
MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT THOSE GUYS!
You guys are killing me. Can't believe they drafted him over so and so who has just as much NFL experience as Weeden does. Absolutely kills me.
Decastro would slide in where? LG? Oh yea we already have a LG that they like. No crap they didn't take him. They like Pinkston at LG and they already told us that. Shouldn't be a huge shocker. |
They also said they liked McCoy moving forward. Who cares? |
LG and QB are 2 totally different stories. |
yeah, one of them can be moved to a different position while the other one won't see any action unless the starter gets hurt.
_________________
Adopt-a-Brown: Jabaal Sheard - Stats:
2011: 55 Tackles - 8.5 Sacks - 5 FF - 1 FR - 2 PD - 7 STF
2012: 54 Tackles - 7 Sacks - 1 FF - 3 PD - 2 STF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
