NFL Forum :: - Peter King says Jags like Gilmore "a ton"

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

Peter King says Jags like Gilmore "a ton"
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

iPwn

Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35482
Location: Stand United

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject:

Its A Sabotage wrote:

Why would Cox be a camp cut, was easily a top-10 CB before injury.

I know he only played 5 games, but didn't he have the lowest yards per game allowed in the league for a multigame starter?
_________________

samgurl775 wrote:

It's alright iPwn, you're my #1.

EliteTexan80 wrote:

I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!!

Olympia Martin

Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 6158
Location: N.Y.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject:

Its A Sabotage wrote:

Why would Cox be a camp cut, was easily a top-10 CB before injury.

Cox rebounded last season after a brutal 2009 and 2010 campaign. My point was more his contract makes it easy to release him, not that it is likely to happen. You can make an argument that Mathis, Middleton, Cox, Youboty and Trent do not cost the team much financially to cut come the final 53. Not that any or all are going to be needed to be cut but their contracts allow it to happen if needed.

Remember when New Orleans drafted Patrick Robinson in round 1 when they had just signed Greer. Similar situation.

skaterbirdhouse

Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 8379
Location: Gainesville

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject:

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:

I dont like Gilmore in the Top-20.

We have ZERO need at CB, we invested money this year in the position as well plus this isnt like the DT position when we drafted Alualu because Henderson was declining.

I know BPA is important, but I'd take 20 prospects over Gillmore

I wouldn't say that we've got no need. I'd still rank it 3rd after WR and DE. Cox is good along with Mathis, but Mathis is getting old. Ross is ok but shouldn't be guaranteed a starting position at all, Coleman is great in the slot and middleton is a great #4 but I wouldn't want him starting full time.

Basically the way I see it we could defiantly use a great #1 or #2 to go along with Cox.

iPwn

Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35482
Location: Stand United

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject:

Olympia Martin wrote:

Cox rebounded last season after a brutal 2009 and 2010 campaign.

He was only "brutal" when he had his foot injury and got down on himself about it. He played well before and after that. The struggles on the back end of the defense as a whole those two years also had a ton to do with bad safeties causing the scheme to have to be altered in ways that weren't positive. The safeties were so bad at covering deep that the corners were forced to play 10 yards off the LOS, allowing underneath routes all game long.
_________________

samgurl775 wrote:

It's alright iPwn, you're my #1.

EliteTexan80 wrote:

I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!!

charles shelton

Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1666

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:27 pm Post subject:

I have no problem taking a corner if that's who is bpa and we aren't able to trade down, but like the rest of you, when I see "major hole at corner" I pretty much ignore everything else he has to say about the jaguars since he is obviously not familiar with the roster at all. I'm also firmly on the Decastro bandwagon, though I do think 7 is a bit high for an interior lineman. If we could trade down to say kc's spot at 11, I wouldn't mind Decastro there, in fact I'd be thrilled with such a move.

-charles

bobloblaw86

Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 9970
Location: Toronto

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject:

iPwn wrote:

Olympia Martin wrote:

Cox rebounded last season after a brutal 2009 and 2010 campaign.

Yeah, I think awful safety play had a lot to do with it. The CB play wasn't good, but when you have no faith in the guys around you, it can make you play even worse because you're either trying to do too much, or playing scared. Then your confidence takes and hit and things get out of hand.

Mr. V

Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 2604
Location: Florida

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:59 pm Post subject:

_________________

Thank you daboyle250 for the sig.

Its A Sabotage

Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 28135
Location: Do. Your. Job.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject:

iPwn wrote:

Its A Sabotage wrote:

Why would Cox be a camp cut, was easily a top-10 CB before injury.

I know he only played 5 games, but didn't he have the lowest yards per game allowed in the league for a multigame starter?

Yes, yes he did.
_________________

green24 wrote:

Sabo is the best poster on FF

Tugboat

Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject:

DjBuddaH wrote:

WR has pretty much been solved for this season, so if a player falls to us, we won't reach on a WR. DE is still needed as we don't have much youth. I honestly wouldn't be hurt by taking Gilmore, but I would hope we could arrange a trade with Cleveland to take Claiborne. Either way I'm bleh at this point....and not a fan of King anyways.

If the current lineup is Gene's idea of 'solved' for the WR group, I will be extremely disappointed.

Our lineup is far stronger at CB than it is at WR.

DjBuddaH

Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 7907

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:51 pm Post subject:

Tugboat wrote:

DjBuddaH wrote:

If the current lineup is Gene's idea of 'solved' for the WR group, I will be extremely disappointed.

Our lineup is far stronger at CB than it is at WR.

I stated for this season so there is no need to reach on a WR. And honestly I'd call both positions a wash.
_________________

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=7978242#7978242

Esteban wrote:

If people would listen to my advice I would give it but until then I wont

JaguarCrazy2832

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:15 am Post subject:

The VALUE at pick 7 is probably with the DL/OL
_________________

McMorrow_922

Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 2532

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:33 am Post subject:

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:

The VALUE at pick 7 is probably with the DL/OL

I agree.
_________________

Adopt a JAGUAR

Laurent Robinson-

Marcedes Lewis-

FREDDY T

Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 5287
Location: NY

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:14 am Post subject:

McMorrow_922 wrote:

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:

The VALUE at pick 7 is probably with the DL/OL

I agree.

reiff and castro are both guards at the next level =/= #7 pick overall

bobloblaw86

Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 9970
Location: Toronto

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:32 am Post subject:

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:

The VALUE at pick 7 is probably with the DL/OL

Where's the value at OL - Reiff is not going to be the BPA at 7. Future guard with character concerns... he's not even a top 10 player in the draft. You can make an argument for DeCastro but again, being a G is a mark against him. Other than him I see no one on the OL who offers value.

JaguarCrazy2832

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject:

bobloblaw86 wrote:

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:

The VALUE at pick 7 is probably with the DL/OL

Kalil and Decastro were the only 2 I was referring to
_________________

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Page 2 of 4

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum