Which pick would you hate more?

Estonianzulu · Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:19 pm Post subject:

Brandon Weeden is an older version of Graham Harrell. He does nothing exceptionally well. He's got good but not great accuracy, average arm strength, plays in a system that drastically inflates his statistics and has shown nothing to me to appear as a franchise QB.

Id rather we take a risk on a franchise guy if they believe he has the potential than on a filler.
_________________

KamTrus20 · Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 4772

I can't believe Tannehill is winning the hate contest.

He has more upside and a much higher chance of having the longest career. No previous arm injuries like Weeden. I think some Blackmon/Richardson fans are voting simply because they'll miss out on their guy.

IMO if we go QB with one of the first three picks then I'd rather go Tannehill at #4 than waste 22 or 37 on Weeden. If Weeden were their in the 3rd or later I wouldn't have a problem.
_________________

Jamison on the sig

Productiondawg · Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 384 Location: Cincinnati

I don't like either one of these choices but I don't like Tannehill at 4 more. I like a lot of the QBs coming out next year better than both of these guys and a 29 year old QB in the second doesn't make it as impossible to draft to draft one of them as it would to take an inferior QB with the 4th overall pick.
_________________
"If you can't stand the neural activity, than stay out of the neural activator" -Professor Fink

Season tickets, section 315, since 06
See you in the Muni with the Tailgate DJs

BooyaCS · Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 6087

dairyu · Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject:

Here is why I hate the Taney pick more. 2nd round qb picks that bust dont set your franchise back 3 -5 years. High 1st round qb's have a way of doing that though.

ditchdigger · Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 14043 Location: Columbus, OH

I am bookmarking this page to resurrect next year, when everyone hates the available QBs and is drooling over the 2014 prospects.

Weeden before round 4 is a much bigger reach than Tannehill at 4, so Weeden at 37 gets my vote.

Bonanza23 · Joined: 10 Nov 2008 Posts: 5418

BrownsDog23 · Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 271 Location: United States

Tannehill at 4 and it not even close. I not a big fan of Weeden but the difference in missing on pick 4 and 37 is huge. Taking Tannehill at 4 means missing out on Elite prospect like Richardson and Claiborne. The fact that Tannehill seems to be a lock to go top ten is still mind blowing to me.

DawgSoldier · Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5947 Location: Medina OH

nakka · Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 228

I picked Weeden.

If Weeden was 23 coming out, I'd still not like the pick at 37.
He is a Kolb type of QB. Perhaps a top 32 QB in the league, but in the bottom 10 and certainly not someone I'd give a long term contract to.

LETSGOBROWNIES · Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 6845 Location: CINCINNATI

BrownsDog23 · Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 271 Location: United States

mistakebytehlak · Joined: 20 Nov 2005 Posts: 38708 Location: Brooklyn, NY

HanShotFirst · Joined: 12 Jan 2012 Posts: 481 Location: Mos Eisley Cantina

I am not a huge fan of either QB. However Tannehill's upside is much stronger. Weedon seems like a solid option but does anyone project him to go to a pro bowl? Tannehill might become a franchise QB. Weedon has much less of a chance IMO. If we spend a high pick I would rather try for a home run rather than a base hit.

Can anyone tell that MLB is about to start?
_________________
Go Browns ~ Win Tribe ~ Cavs!

HanShotFirst is not a topical medication or food product and is not to be taken internally or seriously.

smh · Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 3692

Hate Weeden @ 37.