| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
derekfelty
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 567
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:26 pm Post subject: LaMichael James -ORE- ? |
 |
|
|
Any ideals for this dude to be draft by the titans?
_________________
NFL: Titans_Ravens_
NCAA: Texas_LSU_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TitanSS
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 2034
Location: My house
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| We won't be able to after we trade our whole draft to the Rams for the 2nd pick so we can get RGIII. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-Munch-
Joined: 26 Sep 2011
Posts: 2628
Location: Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Yeah plus when we trade Karl Klug for Adrian Peterson we'll have him and CJ and I think that'll be enough |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18643
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why would we go after James?
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
derekfelty
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 567
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We can't trade karl klug for adrian peterson?
I maybe just though that we could go after LaMichael James to help out c.j. I know we're not gonna get him but what if we did get him what would yall do.
_________________
NFL: Titans_Ravens_
NCAA: Texas_LSU_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18643
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| derekfelty wrote: | | I maybe just though that we could go after LaMichael James to help out c.j. I know we're not gonna get him but what if we did get him what would yall do. |
What do you expect us to do? Jump for joy? I'd watch the games every Sunday and if they play on Monday or Thursday, I'll watch them.
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
derekfelty
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 567
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
You never know, anything can happen at the last min.
Chris Rainey or LaMicael James would be nice to get in the nfl draft.
_________________
NFL: Titans_Ravens_
NCAA: Texas_LSU_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MdTitansFan56
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| derekfelty wrote: | You never know, anything can happen at the last min.
Chris Rainey or LaMicael James would be nice to get in the nfl draft. |
Are you sure you aren't Al Davis?
_________________
1. Alex Morgan 2.San Antonio Spurs 3. Chicago White Sox 4. Ohio State 5. Buckeyes 6. Philadelphia Flyers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ockham
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 3033
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like Robert Turbin. He's built like a truck, moves well, and runs nice routes. 4th or 5th round?
_________________
| stallyns wrote: | | Cortland Finnegan signs with the Rams, the division just got classier. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VYoung10
Joined: 02 Oct 2008
Posts: 8538
Location: Billings-406
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yes LaMichael James and CJ. That makes sense.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viejid
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 510
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ok, everyone is dismissing this guy like he just said the dumbest thing in the world.
Let me ask this: if Adrian Peterson was in this draft available at #20, would you pass on him because we have CJ?
Taking CJ at 20whatever it is we took it was looked at by every casual fan like a stupid decision. If we can get another top caliber RB? I wouldn't say no.
Yes, I agree that other positions are bigger needs. But it's been shown in today's NFL that you need 2 backs. If we happen to get 2 of the best in the league, more power to us.
How do we deal with all the other needs? That is a very valid question. But the big question is going to be what the value is for each position at the point. Id rather not reach just to fill a need. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VYoung10
Joined: 02 Oct 2008
Posts: 8538
Location: Billings-406
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| viejid wrote: | Ok, everyone is dismissing this guy like he just said the dumbest thing in the world.
Let me ask this: if Adrian Peterson was in this draft available at #20, would you pass on him because we have CJ?
Taking CJ at 20whatever it is we took it was looked at by every casual fan like a stupid decision. If we can get another top caliber RB? I wouldn't say no.
Yes, I agree that other positions are bigger needs. But it's been shown in today's NFL that you need 2 backs. If we happen to get 2 of the best in the league, more power to us.
How do we deal with all the other needs? That is a very valid question. But the big question is going to be what the value is for each position at the point. Id rather not reach just to fill a need. |
Um lamichael is not even close to the rb that AP is. Plus we have s number two back shaft
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18643
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| VYoung10 wrote: | | viejid wrote: | Ok, everyone is dismissing this guy like he just said the dumbest thing in the world.
Let me ask this: if Adrian Peterson was in this draft available at #20, would you pass on him because we have CJ?
Taking CJ at 20whatever it is we took it was looked at by every casual fan like a stupid decision. If we can get another top caliber RB? I wouldn't say no.
Yes, I agree that other positions are bigger needs. But it's been shown in today's NFL that you need 2 backs. If we happen to get 2 of the best in the league, more power to us.
How do we deal with all the other needs? That is a very valid question. But the big question is going to be what the value is for each position at the point. Id rather not reach just to fill a need. |
Um lamichael is not even close to the rb that AP is. Plus we have s number two back shaft |
You tell him. Even if AP was available at #20 I'd pass bc we have CJ who is still in my mind a top 2 back maybe even #1. 1 down year doesn't push you back out of the top 5.
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viejid
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 510
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| VYoung10 wrote: | | viejid wrote: | Ok, everyone is dismissing this guy like he just said the dumbest thing in the world.
Let me ask this: if Adrian Peterson was in this draft available at #20, would you pass on him because we have CJ?
Taking CJ at 20whatever it is we took it was looked at by every casual fan like a stupid decision. If we can get another top caliber RB? I wouldn't say no.
Yes, I agree that other positions are bigger needs. But it's been shown in today's NFL that you need 2 backs. If we happen to get 2 of the best in the league, more power to us.
How do we deal with all the other needs? That is a very valid question. But the big question is going to be what the value is for each position at the point. Id rather not reach just to fill a need. |
Um lamichael is not even close to the rb that AP is. Plus we have s number two back shaft |
Excuse me. When did I say that Lamichael James was anywhere close to being Adrian Peterson? Reading comprehension please.
What I am saying is that JUST because we already have a RB doesn't mean we pass up on a player IF we think the guy is top notch.
Is Lamichael James top notch? That is the question that needs to be answered. More importantly, is he a good value at #20?
Javon Ringer looks like he's reached his ceiling as a back. Jamie Harper could develop, but I feel Lamichael James has a much higher ceiling. And I don't think we want CJ to keep getting all the carries in a game, because he doesn't have the body to last.
Would I pick Lamichael James at 20? Probably not, because I think there will be value at several of the positions we need to draft (DE/OLB, OL). But I wouldn't just disregard the option completely.
Again, the drafting of CJ was just as puzzling to most people. A lot of us thought he would be more of a slot receiver guy. And no one understood why we were taking it when Lendale was already our RB.
In light of CJ struggling (although it is my belief a lot of that was on the Oline), we need to have a legit backup plan, and I don't know that im willing to bet the franchise on Ringer and harper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
YoungLane
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 89
Location: TN
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| viejid wrote: | | VYoung10 wrote: | | viejid wrote: | Ok, everyone is dismissing this guy like he just said the dumbest thing in the world.
Let me ask this: if Adrian Peterson was in this draft available at #20, would you pass on him because we have CJ?
Taking CJ at 20whatever it is we took it was looked at by every casual fan like a stupid decision. If we can get another top caliber RB? I wouldn't say no.
Yes, I agree that other positions are bigger needs. But it's been shown in today's NFL that you need 2 backs. If we happen to get 2 of the best in the league, more power to us.
How do we deal with all the other needs? That is a very valid question. But the big question is going to be what the value is for each position at the point. Id rather not reach just to fill a need. |
Um lamichael is not even close to the rb that AP is. Plus we have s number two back shaft |
Excuse me. When did I say that Lamichael James was anywhere close to being Adrian Peterson? Reading comprehension please.
What I am saying is that JUST because we already have a RB doesn't mean we pass up on a player IF we think the guy is top notch.
Is Lamichael James top notch? That is the question that needs to be answered. More importantly, is he a good value at #20?
Javon Ringer looks like he's reached his ceiling as a back. Jamie Harper could develop, but I feel Lamichael James has a much higher ceiling. And I don't think we want CJ to keep getting all the carries in a game, because he doesn't have the body to last.
Would I pick Lamichael James at 20? Probably not, because I think there will be value at several of the positions we need to draft (DE/OLB, OL). But I wouldn't just disregard the option completely.
Again, the drafting of CJ was just as puzzling to most people. A lot of us thought he would be more of a slot receiver guy. And no one understood why we were taking it when Lendale was already our RB.
In light of CJ struggling (although it is my belief a lot of that was on the Oline), we need to have a legit backup plan, and I don't know that im willing to bet the franchise on Ringer and harper. |
The difference is Lendale was a bruising short-yardage back. CJ coming out was supposed to be our speed back and a change of pace, so they complimented each other very well. Lamicheal and CJ are basically the same type of back. It makes no sense to draft him unless you plan on getting rid of CJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
