| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73448
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:26 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jdjonesdrew32
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 1304
Location: CheektaVegas, NY
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i thought about that when writing the suggestion, but i think Thomas still can develop into our #2(crazy thought, i know) w/ less reps on ST and better coaching and play calling from a new OC and WR coach. also i think with a new team, Royal can renew himself as the solid slot he started out as (rookie yr 91rec-908yds-5tds) before being moved down the depth chart and loosing reps to a power run offense this yr.
_________________
give props to - Pick6_Finnegan - for the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15067
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He lost reps because he demanded a trade because of Tebow when he basically had no legs to stand on.
We have enough secondary options that can be slot guys in... well, basically all the WRs we have. If he were brought in to do returning then that'd make some sense, but I doubt it happens. What this team is is someone who can be the #1 either now or down the road.
_________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5751
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73448
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist. |
I wonder for how cheap. I cant wait for the offseason 
When does FA signing start?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5751
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist. |
I wonder for how cheap. I cant wait for the offseason
When does FA signing start? |
Either March 1, or the third.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73448
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist. |
I wonder for how cheap. I cant wait for the offseason
When does FA signing start? |
Either March 1, or the third. |
Damn, over 2 months 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5751
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist. |
I wonder for how cheap. I cant wait for the offseason
When does FA signing start? |
Either March 1, or the third. |
Damn, over 2 months |
We've been discussing it for the past 4.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73448
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | jdjonesdrew32 wrote: | eddie royal anyone??
solid slot WR and could also be solid in the return game. (something we have been weak on this yr.) |
Dont we have that in Mike Thomas? |
We do unless Mike has to be the primary receiver on offense. But ideally, Mike only plays offense. Royal could be a good signing for cheap who would be the 4th or 5th receiver and return specialist. |
I wonder for how cheap. I cant wait for the offseason
When does FA signing start? |
Either March 1, or the third. |
Damn, over 2 months |
We've been discussing it for the past 4. |
True, i guess thats why i thought it was closer
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bobloblaw86
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 9970
Location: Toronto
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Anyone else like it better when free agency was after the draft? The whole idea is to "build through draft, patch through free agency". It seems like patching is easier when you know for sure what your remaining needs are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15067
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bobloblaw86 wrote: | | Anyone else like it better when free agency was after the draft? The whole idea is to "build through draft, patch through free agency". It seems like patching is easier when you know for sure what your remaining needs are. |
Yeah, it did seem better that way, but we probably won't see it again.
_________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5751
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | bobloblaw86 wrote: | | Anyone else like it better when free agency was after the draft? The whole idea is to "build through draft, patch through free agency". It seems like patching is easier when you know for sure what your remaining needs are. |
Yeah, it did seem better that way, but we probably won't see it again. |
I remember rumors around the start of the season that they were thinking about re-configuring and condensing the offseason. That may mean they could entertain switching the two. It seemed to help teams be more BAP in the draft and more responsible in free agency when they were reversed.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoJags11
Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 4388
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would love to sign eddie royal, the guy has legit speed and quickness and is an upgrade over any of our wrecievers, including mike thomas..
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5751
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GoJags11 wrote: | | I would love to sign eddie royal, the guy has legit speed and quickness and is an upgrade over any of our wrecievers, including mike thomas.. |
I know its off topic, but how long ago was your sig quote? I know it couldn't have been recent. Right?
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jagsr4real
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 17172
Location: the Cult of Personality(jamison. on the sig)
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GoJags11 wrote: | | I would love to sign eddie royal, the guy has legit speed and quickness and is an upgrade over any of our wrecievers, including mike thomas.. |
i know madden ratings mean jack squat but royals rated an 80 and thomas an 85 on the wii for madden 2012. Id say thomas is better than royal as thomas can be a good number 2.
_________________
IN Blaine Gabbert I Trust
[quote="Adrenaline_Flux"] I'd rather have Katy Perry, but I'd be more than happy with Aimee Teegarden.[/quote] give me aimee all day |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
