| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
riggensghost
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 403
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:27 am Post subject: No Williams, No Edwards, then what... |
 |
|
|
With the Vikes most likely picking up the 7th pick from the Raiders and with a new void to fill at WR, Mike Williams and Braylon Edwards will most certainly not be available at the 9th spot now. Whomever Chicago doesn't take at 4, will now most likely be gone at 7.
Do we trade down at this point or take the best available player at 9 if it makes sense? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrdriii
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Location: NY
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think we have to trade down and take the best available WR or DE. Maybe even trade down a couple times if neither one is available. Clayton is a good bet in the 13-15 range and he catches everything. I say trade down get Clayton and try for Baas in the 2nd rnd.
D  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
e16bball
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 14976
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah right on point mrdriii...
The only thing I might say is that Troy Williamson might be a better fit as a pure deep threat.
Baas would be stellar if we could snare him in the 2nd.
That would actually be my 2nd favorite scenario possible. My favorite of course is Williams/Edwards at 9 and Ben Wilkerson in the 3rd. But being as the topic is "if williams and edwards arent there" I definitely agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TrueRedskin05
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1018
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i think if we could give our 9th pick and coles to any team that is in the top 6 spots in the draft we could get either braylon or williams and if they team we trade to took the salary cap hit for coles we would be great |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
