| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Blaze King
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 12455
Location: Philawarepragacago
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:50 pm Post subject: Lions Forum Fantasy Baseball V [Week 12 Power Rankings] |
 |
|
|
Draft Thread
Discussion Thread #1 (412)
Discussion Thread #2 (231)
Discussion Thread #3 (158)
Discussion Thread #4 (137)
Verlander Division
1. Blaze King - Kings of Blaze (15-6, 2nd)
2. Lionsfanforever - Shot Down in Flames (10-10-1, 8th)
3. Lionsfan630 - Legion of Doom (7-12-2, 9th)
4. Nagahide13 - The LBC Dirtbags (10-11, 10th)
Illitch Division
1. LionsFTW - FTW's Winners (9-10-2, 11th)
2. DetroitLions703 - Mad Heights Mustangs (10-10-1, 5th)
3. Louis Friend - House of Spears (6-13-2, 12th)
4. Sllim Pickins - G-MONEY's Drinking Buddy (11-10, 1st)
Leyland Division
1. FootballPhreak - Howell Knotheads (11-9-1, 3rd)
2. X_Factor_40 - Team Black (10-11, 7th)
3. LION KING - NOVI WILDCATS (11-9-1, 4th)
4. DavisBlack - The Badfish (11-10, 6th)
Kaline Division
1. Detfan728004 - Team Detfan728004 (N/A)
2. 1King - Team 1King (N/A)
3. YLionsY - Team Furlong (N/A)
4. BillySims - IMAX Slammers (N/A)
_________________
Last edited by Blaze King on Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:26 pm; edited 6 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blaze King
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 12455
Location: Philawarepragacago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Week 9 Power Rankings
1] NOVI WILDCATS [8-1] {1}
2] Mad Heights Mustangs [7-2] {4}
3] The LBC Dirtbags [6-2-1] {7}
4] Team Detfan728004 [7-2] {3}
5] The Badfish [7-2] {2}
6] Team Furlong [6-3] {8}
7] Team 1King [6-3] {5}
8] Blaze's Bombers [5-4] {10}
9] The Mud Hens [5-4] {6}
10] G-Money's Drinking Buddys [4-5] {9}
11] Howell Knotheads [2-6-1] {11}
12] Shot Down in Flames [2-6-1] {12}
13] House of Spears [2-7] {13}
14] Legion of Doom [1-7-1] {15}
15] FTW's Winners [1-8] {16}
16] IMAX Slammers [0-7-2] {14}
Matchup of the Week: (2) Mad Heights Mustangs Vs. (6) Team Furlong
Headlines of Week 9:
Mad Heights closing in on #1?
10 teams left? Early in the season there appears to be a big gap between 1-10 and 11-16.
The LBC Dirtbags are anything but dirt, as they have a four game winning streak.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blaze King wrote: |
Week 9 Power Rankings
1] NOVI WILDCATS [8-1] {1}
2] Mad Heights Mustangs [7-2] {4}
3] The LBC Dirtbags [6-2-1] {7}
4] Team Detfan728004 [7-2] {3}
5] The Badfish [7-2] {2}
6] Team Furlong [6-3] {8}
7] Team 1King [6-3] {5}
8] Blaze's Bombers [5-4] {10}
9] The Mud Hens [5-4] {6}
10] G-Money's Drinking Buddys [4-5] {9}
11] Howell Knotheads [2-6-1] {11}
12] Shot Down in Flames [2-6-1] {12}
13] House of Spears [2-7] {13}
14] Legion of Doom [1-7-1] {15}
15] FTW's Winners [1-8] {16}
16] IMAX Slammers [0-7-2] {14}
Matchup of the Week: (2) Mad Heights Mustangs Vs. (6) Team Furlong
Headlines of Week 9:
Mad Heights closing in on #1?
10 teams left? Early in the season there appears to be a big gap between 1-10 and 11-16.
The LBC Dirtbags are anything but dirt, as they have a four game winning streak. |
Your rankings are a freaking joke at best. So much bias it isnt funny. I win and easily and I drop. LBC jumps me from 7 to 3? Lame
LBC is top 5 in 2 stat CATS and has less wins
I am top 5 in 7 stat Cats and one more win and top 3 in 6 cats.
There is no way LBC should have jumped me in a non-bias rankings given I didnt do anything to hurt my rankings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
A real power ranking based on team production and not over rated teams based on keepers and crap depth.
Rankings with prior week in () at end
Detfan782004 Standings based on numbers only!
1. Novi (149) Last week (148) +1
2. Detfan78 (146) Last week (139) +7
3. 1King (138) Last week (140) -2
4. Badfish (136) Last week (141) -5
5. MHM (132) Last week (122) +10
6. LBC (115) Last week (114) +1
7. Furlong (114) Last week (111) +3
8. Mudhens (103) Last week (106) -3
9. Gmoney (101) Last week (107) -6
10. Blaze (97) Last week (97) 0
11. Howell (95) Last week (102) -7
12. Legion (92) Last week (99) -7
13. Shot Down (84) Last week (8  -4
14. Imax (59) Last week (64) -5
15. House (57) Last week (62) -5
16. FTW (54) Last week (5 -4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blaze King
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 12455
Location: Philawarepragacago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | Didn't move up one point even with a big win.  |
Because you over rate your team. It simply isnt that good.
Your rankings are complete CRAP. I mean I drop a spot even though I won easily and near top in a lot of cats.
Please. I am glad I developed my UNBIAS system.
Your team is currently 12th in HR, 11th in rbi, 10th in Ks, 14th in era, and 14th in whip.
That is how you didnt move up in the unbiased polls |
That's exactly it, your rankings take only PAST STATS...
They don't forsee going into the future, I mean I'll still take Pujols, Hanley and Crawford going into the future over some scrubs batting .290.
I mean all of them are batting less than .275 all three, who would have ever thought that?
History says there bound to hit better, because they are not old.
I take everything into my rankings, past future, and moving forward. You don't. |
Power rankings are not based on future. None that I have ever seen that are reputable. It is about how the team is currently performed to date |
My rankings are in order of confidence who I think is most likely to win next week.
I'm the AP Poll, your the BCS poll.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | Didn't move up one point even with a big win. |
Because you over rate your team. It simply isnt that good.
Your rankings are complete CRAP. I mean I drop a spot even though I won easily and near top in a lot of cats.
Please. I am glad I developed my UNBIAS system.
Your team is currently 12th in HR, 11th in rbi, 10th in Ks, 14th in era, and 14th in whip.
That is how you didnt move up in the unbiased polls |
That's exactly it, your rankings take only PAST STATS...
They don't forsee going into the future, I mean I'll still take Pujols, Hanley and Crawford going into the future over some scrubs batting .290.
I mean all of them are batting less than .275 all three, who would have ever thought that?
History says there bound to hit better, because they are not old.
I take everything into my rankings, past future, and moving forward. You don't. |
Power rankings are not based on future. None that I have ever seen that are reputable. It is about how the team is currently performed to date |
My rankings are in order of confidence who I think is most likely to win next week.
I'm the AP Poll, your the BCS poll. |
Whatever makes you feel better about your team I guess.
Stats dont lie. I dont care if you think your superstars will rebound. Superstars eventually fade.
Novi has keepers and guess what...they are producing. THat is the difference between 1st and 10th in rankings. Production.
You can clearly climb with another good week. If you have another week like last you could jump from 10th to 6th in a power rankings based on production.
I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blaze King
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 12455
Location: Philawarepragacago
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | Didn't move up one point even with a big win. |
Because you over rate your team. It simply isnt that good.
Your rankings are complete CRAP. I mean I drop a spot even though I won easily and near top in a lot of cats.
Please. I am glad I developed my UNBIAS system.
Your team is currently 12th in HR, 11th in rbi, 10th in Ks, 14th in era, and 14th in whip.
That is how you didnt move up in the unbiased polls |
That's exactly it, your rankings take only PAST STATS...
They don't forsee going into the future, I mean I'll still take Pujols, Hanley and Crawford going into the future over some scrubs batting .290.
I mean all of them are batting less than .275 all three, who would have ever thought that?
History says there bound to hit better, because they are not old.
I take everything into my rankings, past future, and moving forward. You don't. |
Power rankings are not based on future. None that I have ever seen that are reputable. It is about how the team is currently performed to date |
My rankings are in order of confidence who I think is most likely to win next week.
I'm the AP Poll, your the BCS poll. |
Whatever makes you feel better about your team I guess.
Stats dont lie. I dont care if you think your superstars will rebound. Superstars eventually fade.
Novi has keepers and guess what...they are producing. THat is the difference between 1st and 10th in rankings. Production.
You can clearly climb with another good week. If you have another week like last you could jump from 10th to 6th in a power rankings based on production.
I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
Not based on matchups, based on if they were going up against a league average team.
I mean, if superstars eventually fade, Hunter Pence, Astrubal Cabrera and Michael Morse are bound to fade harder and farther then right?
Or does that not work against your team?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 30785
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
If you played LBC right now you would lose your rear. And that is PRECISELY what power rankings are about.
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Blaze King wrote: | | Didn't move up one point even with a big win. |
Because you over rate your team. It simply isnt that good.
Your rankings are complete CRAP. I mean I drop a spot even though I won easily and near top in a lot of cats.
Please. I am glad I developed my UNBIAS system.
Your team is currently 12th in HR, 11th in rbi, 10th in Ks, 14th in era, and 14th in whip.
That is how you didnt move up in the unbiased polls |
That's exactly it, your rankings take only PAST STATS...
They don't forsee going into the future, I mean I'll still take Pujols, Hanley and Crawford going into the future over some scrubs batting .290.
I mean all of them are batting less than .275 all three, who would have ever thought that?
History says there bound to hit better, because they are not old.
I take everything into my rankings, past future, and moving forward. You don't. |
Power rankings are not based on future. None that I have ever seen that are reputable. It is about how the team is currently performed to date |
My rankings are in order of confidence who I think is most likely to win next week.
I'm the AP Poll, your the BCS poll. |
Whatever makes you feel better about your team I guess.
Stats dont lie. I dont care if you think your superstars will rebound. Superstars eventually fade.
Novi has keepers and guess what...they are producing. THat is the difference between 1st and 10th in rankings. Production.
You can clearly climb with another good week. If you have another week like last you could jump from 10th to 6th in a power rankings based on production.
I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
Not based on matchups, based on if they were going up against a league average team.
I mean, if superstars eventually fade, Hunter Pence, Astrubal Cabrera and Michael Morse are bound to fade harder and farther then right?
Or does that not work against your team? |
You are claiming your team will rebound. You depend on superstars.
My depth makes up for when my good players struggle.
My depth crushes yours. THat is the difference. You are top heavy with NO substance at bottom.
Rios looks awesome with his 14 rbi i guess. Jeter with his 16. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
If you played LBC right now you would lose your rear. And that is PRECISELY what power rankings are about. |
Actually no
We would have tied this last week |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nagahide13
Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 10461
Location: Stumptown
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I love being near the center of so much drama!
_________________
| LION KING wrote: | | I actually feel nothing anymore ! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 30785
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | | FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
If you played LBC right now you would lose your rear. And that is PRECISELY what power rankings are about. |
Actually no
We would have tied this last week |
You would lose, of that I have little doubt. Almost your entire team is playing over their heads.
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
If you played LBC right now you would lose your rear. And that is PRECISELY what power rankings are about. |
Actually no
We would have tied this last week |
You would lose, of that I have little doubt. Almost your entire team is playing over their heads. |
There last three weeks we would be 1-1-1
I would have tied him last week. Numbers dont lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 30785
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | | FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | FootballPhreak wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | I didnt lose and you drop me based on next week? So I guess you see me losing to 2 win team and LBC dominating a Mudhens team who just added Howard?
I call BS |
If you played LBC right now you would lose your rear. And that is PRECISELY what power rankings are about. |
Actually no
We would have tied this last week |
You would lose, of that I have little doubt. Almost your entire team is playing over their heads. |
There last three weeks we would be 1-1-1
I would have tied him last week. Numbers dont lie. |
They do when your team is clearly playing over their heads to this point 
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39411
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
LBC avg cat ranking is 7.75 of 16.
Mine is 5.5 of 16.
Yea he would CLEARLY dominate me. 
He is top 5 in ONLY 2 Cats. My team is top 3 in 6.
Whatever. There is a reason I am sitting at 7 wins i guess while the critics are bailing on their season or about to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
