| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CentralFC
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 3266
Location: Evanston, IL
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:14 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| incognito_man wrote: | 3-horse race at this point between Rodgers, Brady and Peyton.
Rodgers led in PR and TDs coming into this week. He's at absolute worst 3rd right now.
Might be 2nd to Manning after this week. |
Four weeks left. It'll be close.
_________________
Simian07: | Quote: | | I'd argue Jordy is probably around the 30th-40th best receiver in the NFL, maybe 50th. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
persiandud
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 822
Location: Davis, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| It's going to be Peyton, unless Rodgers ends the year with monster games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 9912
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| tabbaker wrote: | | Rodgers isn't even top 5 |
LOL, really? I gotta hear who you have 1-5 then.
_________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pugger
Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 7200
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm sure Rodgers had a happy birthday today. 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 7029
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rodgers needs a monster game next week to re-enter the MVP convo. National TV spotlight is huge for MVP talk. He needs a 4-5TD game with 300+ yards. Right now it's probably something like this:
Peyton
Brady
Rodgers
Peterson
Even though they have similar #'s, Rodgers has less yards and has a bad national TV game on his record, as well as a worse record, so he's behind Manning and Brady. Need to have some big games to end the season, especially next week in the spotlight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Title Town USA
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 18359
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mannings has the whole 'comeback from neck surgery' thing going for him too. He's winning MVP, easily.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 9912
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I Am Rodgers wrote: | Rodgers needs a monster game next week to re-enter the MVP convo. National TV spotlight is huge for MVP talk. He needs a 4-5TD game with 300+ yards. Right now it's probably something like this:
Peyton
Brady
Rodgers
Peterson
Even though they have similar #'s, Rodgers has less yards and has a bad national TV game on his record, as well as a worse record, so he's behind Manning and Brady. Need to have some big games to end the season, especially next week in the spotlight. |
Manning had a worse national game with what, 3 INTs vs Atlanta? He put them in the hole that lost him that game.
I have:
Brady
Manning/Rodgers
.
..
...
....
.....
Everyone else
But voters using their MVP flow chart are going to wind up voting for Manning.
_________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 7029
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| spilltray wrote: | | I Am Rodgers wrote: | Rodgers needs a monster game next week to re-enter the MVP convo. National TV spotlight is huge for MVP talk. He needs a 4-5TD game with 300+ yards. Right now it's probably something like this:
Peyton
Brady
Rodgers
Peterson
Even though they have similar #'s, Rodgers has less yards and has a bad national TV game on his record, as well as a worse record, so he's behind Manning and Brady. Need to have some big games to end the season, especially next week in the spotlight. |
Manning had a worse national game with what, 3 INTs vs Atlanta? He put them in the hole that lost him that game.
I have:
Brady
Manning/Rodgers
.
..
...
....
.....
Everyone else
But voters using their MVP flow chart are going to wind up voting for Manning. |
That game was also 27-21. Rodgers game was 38-10. Fair? Not really. That's the way it is though. Rodgers needs a dominating performance on national TV to help him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 9912
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I Am Rodgers wrote: | | spilltray wrote: | | I Am Rodgers wrote: | Rodgers needs a monster game next week to re-enter the MVP convo. National TV spotlight is huge for MVP talk. He needs a 4-5TD game with 300+ yards. Right now it's probably something like this:
Peyton
Brady
Rodgers
Peterson
Even though they have similar #'s, Rodgers has less yards and has a bad national TV game on his record, as well as a worse record, so he's behind Manning and Brady. Need to have some big games to end the season, especially next week in the spotlight. |
Manning had a worse national game with what, 3 INTs vs Atlanta? He put them in the hole that lost him that game.
I have:
Brady
Manning/Rodgers
.
..
...
....
.....
Everyone else
But voters using their MVP flow chart are going to wind up voting for Manning. |
That game was also 27-21. Rodgers game was 38-10. Fair? Not really. That's the way it is though. Rodgers needs a dominating performance on national TV to help him. |
And Rodgers vs Houston is far and away better than any game Manning has played, and against better competition. The two even out.
_________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 7029
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Giants game is fresh though. Houston seems like an eternity ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
byzr
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2993
Location: Kentucky
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I Am Rodgers wrote: | | The Giants game is fresh though. Houston seems like an eternity ago. |
ditto. if Rodgers doesn't get "hot" according to the media then Peyton has this thing locked up. the whole "comeback" thing is pretty polarizing.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 7029
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| byzr wrote: | | I Am Rodgers wrote: | | The Giants game is fresh though. Houston seems like an eternity ago. |
ditto. if Rodgers doesn't get "hot" according to the media then Peyton has this thing locked up. the whole "comeback" thing is pretty polarizing. |
Yup. Rodgers is going to need a clear stat lean on Manning to overcome the whole new team, coming back from neck surgery thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bauman1535
Joined: 08 Sep 2009
Posts: 934
Location: Madison, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I really liked going to the game yesterday because I was able to see farther down the field than television shows. It seemed like Rodgers was getting better protection than last week, but it also appeared that we were holding a fair amount of personnel in to help with blocking and the 2-3 receivers we had running routes weren't getting open. I can only remember a handful of throws that weren't the result of a broken play and Rodgers having to roll out to either side. On the plus side, though, we have a quarterback who can do that. I can only imagine what Rodgers would do if he had a pocket that wasn't collapsing every other play... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
General_Bean
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 1243
Location: Crossroads of CT
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So without Rodgers, what are we looking at? 1-11 at this point? You have to believe Rodgers is carrying this team for most of the season
_________________
Packers fan since 93. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
driftwood
Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 5740
Location: Milwaukee
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| General_Bean wrote: | | So without Rodgers, what are we looking at? 1-11 at this point? You have to believe Rodgers is carrying this team for most of the season |
who would our 1 win come from?
i doubt Harrell could get a win with a full week of prep... im not even sure he could protect a lead if #12 were to get hurt
although he did look improved at giving handoffs during the giants blowout (baby steps i guess) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
