oakland/jets rumour

peelout142 · Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 633 Location: coney island

WEBMASTER EDIT: DON'T POST LINKS TO OTHER FORUMS.

sum it up...abe for 6th overall and next years 2nd..

JETS · Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 1538

i would love that. we could get are top 4 players(that i want)

DRick-4th overall
Deangelo-from trading down
giles-36th overall
mangold-in the trade down with deangelo

we could do a trade with th ebroncos (they want mario williams) n get there two firsts talking white with 17 giles with 26 (i think those are the #'s moss with 36 n try n get another second for mangold

peelout142 · Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 633 Location: coney island

no way lol i just said this but ill say it again...if we get rid of abe we need mario

BATCHAMP2000 · Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 285

I really doubt this. I don't think they would give up so much for Abe. If they do then hell yea, I'm all for it.

Gang_Green03 · Joined: 12 Sep 2005 Posts: 3104 Location: New York

Really good trade but Oakland would be pretty stupid to give up that much for him. I'd be happy if it was Abe for the 6th pick only so anything else is a bonus but again I doubt it'll happen.
_________________
"The young heart attack, I spit that cardiac."

MadBacker

shortnproud52 · Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 3847 Location: NY-MIA

Hmmm...

Randy Moss = 7th Overall

John Abraham = 6th Overall and 2nd rounder?

Don't think so...

whydie11 · Joined: 24 Jan 2006 Posts: 663

maybe they ment a 2nd round this year and a second next year?
but i doubt a deal this good for the jets.
wow i would jump in on that in a hurry.
i would even give up anyone else on my team (except vilma and robertson and miller) as a bonus. line them up and let the raiders choose 1 or 2 players.

it prob also includes the jet 1st round in next years draft.

Jets/ND · Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:51 am Post subject:

Yeah right, why would the Raiders want a 28 year old injury prone player when they can have a lot younger and more talented Mario Williams? Thats not a knock on Abraham either since he is a great football player.
_________________

NikeFootball05 · Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2027 Location: New Jersey

Unless San Francisco gets the 6th overall pick could this happen. And even if that happened, we would need Green Bay and San Fran to select Mario Williams and AJ Hawk before Oakland had the chance.
_________________

Ok I'm sorry, do you WANT to lose? I throw, you catch, it's not that hard, ok? All right now get the f@$% outta here.

-Peyton Manning United Way SNL Skit

ekill08x · Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:30 am Post subject:

It would be a very nice trade, and it think it is very possibly, but i still think this team needs a qb. does anyone think penningont has a shot?

whydie11 · Joined: 24 Jan 2006 Posts: 663

jvilma51 · Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 1871

i pray to god this happens, we could get a lot of talent with those picks, hopefully if this is true bradway can actually do it.
_________________

Props to jgoldiscool

Spiel612 · Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:55 pm Post subject:

It probably means we get a 1st and they got Abraham and a 2007 2nd.

I would take that deal in a heartbeat. We could nab Ferguson at #4 overall and DeAngelo Williams would still be available at #6 if the Raiders win the coin toss.

And Mario Williams doesn't fit into our plans. He's got the right weight but he's definitely too tall for the 3-4, he's more of a pass rushing DE and the 3-4 DE's are usually run stoppers and then the guys that blitz are from the outside linebacker spot...

That's why Abe is so important to us this season because he'd be a 3-4 tweener and he'd kill because he's very fast.

Otherwise though I like the move because I feel like we're going to need a new 3-4 DE anyway.
_________________

peelout142 · Joined: 21 Nov 2005 Posts: 633 Location: coney island

no it means we get there 07 second...the webmaster took down the link but here the trade for u new people who didnt see it

we give abe they give 1st rounder and next years 2nd.

Spiel612 · Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:54 pm Post subject: