| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: Vancouver Canucks Thread |
 |
|
|
Canucks Links:
NHL.com
Canucks.com
CapGeek - Canucks
TSN - Canucks Home
ESPN - Canucks Home
HF Boards - Canucks Forum
Canucks.com Message Board
Front Office/Coaching Staff:
General Manager: Mike Gillis
VP Player Ops: Lorne Henning
VP Hockey Ops: Laurence Gilman
Head Coach: Alain Vigneault
Associate Coaches: Rick Bowness, Newell Brown & Darryl Williams
Goaltending Coach: Roland Melanson
Forwards:
  
Daniel Sedin
Number: 22
Height: 6'1
Weight: 187
Shoots: L
Age: 31
Birthplace: Ornskoldsvik, Sweden
Henrik Sedin
Number: 33
Height: 6'2
Weight: 188
Shoots: L
Age: 31
Birthplace: Ornskoldsvik, Sweden
Alex Burrows
Number: 14
Height: 6'1
Weight: 188
Shoots: L
Age: 30
Birthplace: Pincourt, QC, Canada
  
David Booth
Number: 7
Height: 6'0
Weight: 212
Shoots: L
Age: 26
Birthplace: Detroit, MI, United States
Ryan Kesler
Number: 17
Height: 6'2
Weight: 202
Shoots: R
Age: 27
Birthplace: Livonia, MI, United States
Chris Higgins
Number: 20
Height: 6'0
Weight: 205
Shoots: L
Age: 28
Birthplace: Smithtown, NY, United States
  
Manny Malhotra
Number: 27
Height: 6'2
Weight: 220
Shoots: L
Age: 31
Birthplace: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Cody Hodgson
Number: 9
Height: 6'0
Weight: 185
Shoots: R
Age: 21
Birthplace: Toronto, ON, Canada
Jannik Hansen
Number: 36
Height: 6'1
Weight: 195
Shoots: R
Age: 25
Birthplace: Herlev, Denmark
  
Aaron Volpatti
Number: 54
Height: 6'0
Weight: 215
Shoots: L
Age: 26
Birthplace: Revelstoke, BC, Canada
Maxim Lapierre
Number: 40
Height: 6'2
Weight: 207
Shoots: R
Age: 26
Birthplace: Saint-Léonard, QC, Canada
Dale Weise
Number: 32
Height: 6'2
Weight: 210
Shoots: R
Age: 23
Birthplace: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Defense:
 
Dan Hamhuis
Number: 2
Height: 6'1
Weight: 209
Shoots: L
Age: 28
Birthplace: Smithers, BC, Canada
Kevin Bieksa
Number: 3
Height: 6'1
Weight: 198
Shoots: R
Age: 30
Birthplace: Grimsby, ON, Canada
 
Alex Edler
Number: 23
Height: 6'3
Weight: 215
Shoots: L
Age: 25
Birthplace: Ostersund, Sweden
Sami Salo
Number: 6
Height: 6'3
Weight: 212
Shoots: R
Age: 37
Birthplace: Turku, Finland
Keith Ballard
Number: 4
Height: 5'11
Weight: 208
Shoots: L
Age: 28
Birthplace: Baudette, MN, United States
Andrew Alberts
Number: 41
Height: 6'5
Weight: 218
Shoots: L
Age: 30
Birthplace: Minneapolis, MN, United States
Goaltenders:
 
Roberto Luongo
Number: 1
Height: 6'3
Weight: 217
Glove: L
Age: 32
Birthplace: Montreal, QC, Canada
Corey Schneider
Number: 35
Height: 6'2
Weight: 195
Glove: L
Age: 25
Birthplace: Marblehead, MA, United States
Reserves:
Andrew Ebbett
Number: 25
Height: 5'9
Weight: 174
Shoots: L
Age: 28
Birthplace: Vernon, BC, Canada
Alexander Sulzer
Number: 52
Height: 6'1
Weight: 204
Shoots: L
Age: 27
Birthplace: Kaufbeuren, Germany
Injured Reserve:
Mason Raymond
Number: 21
Height: 6'0
Weight: 185
Shoots: L
Age: 26
Birthplace: Cochrane, AB, Canada
Steven Pinizzotto
Number: 13
Height: 6'1
Weight: 200
Shoots: R
Age: 27
Birthplace: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Byron Bitz
Number: -
Height: 6'5
Weight: 215
Shoots: R
Age: 27
Birthplace: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Aaron Rome
Number: 29
Height: 6'1
Weight: 218
Shoots: L
Age: 28
Birthplace: Nesbitt, MB, Canada
_________________
Last edited by Eagles27 on Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:27 pm; edited 164 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Canucks Top Prospects:
Update Coming...
_________________
Last edited by Eagles27 on Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:04 am; edited 9 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TCP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 5287
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
1st off Bertuzzi should never have gotten a penalty. Second Burrows should have gotten one for tripping 10 seconds before the goal.
Oh and Kipper sucks.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Canadian
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 277
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I've been impressed by the Canucks so far. With Luongo, all you guys have to do is make the playoffs, and anything could happen.
About the division though, I really think any of Minnesota, Edmonton, Vancouver and Calgary could win, and if Colorado could get decent goaltender play, I'd add them to the mix as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eagles27 wrote: | This is the new and improved Vancouver Canucks Thread. I will keep the team record, roster and stats updated.
Here are some quick recaps of the first 2 games.
| Eagles27 wrote: | Canucks win 6-0 over the Calgary Flames
Canucks goals by:
-Henrik Sedin
-Steve Bernier
-Alex Burrows (2)
-Mattias Ohlund
-Rick Rypien
Canucks start the season 1-0 |
| Eagles27 wrote: | Canucks beat the Flames 5-4 in OT.
Pavol Demitra with the winning goal.
All goal scorers were:
-Daniel Sedin (2)
-Rick Rypien
-Ryan Kesler
-Pavol Demitra
The Canucks move to 2-0 on the season. |
|
| TCP wrote: | 1st off Bertuzzi should never have gotten a penalty.
Second Burrows should have gotten one for tripping 10 seconds before the goal.
Oh and Kipper sucks. |
Those were 2 of many bad calls. For the first 2 games and preseason it seems like the refs have been the worst I've ever seen.
_________________
Last edited by Eagles27 on Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:00 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Canadian wrote: | I've been impressed by the Canucks so far. With Luongo, all you guys have to do is make the playoffs, and anything could happen.
About the division though, I really think any of Minnesota, Edmonton, Vancouver and Calgary could win, and if Colorado could get decent goaltender play, I'd add them to the mix as well. |
I think the Canucks fans would just be happy to make the playoffs after last year. 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billzz
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 9223
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Luongo>>>>Kipp
Im calling the Canucks in the playoffs in 08
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Canucks are getting the crap kicked out of them today by the Caps.
5-1
Edler with the only goal.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoMoney717
Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 2943
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
SO I am considering getting into hockey this year and the Canucks are standing out as one of the teams I may consider rooting for... Dont know why but they are... I live in the Bay Area so there are tons of Sharks fans out here and I always here about the redwings... Is there a reason I should choose the Canucks?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoMoney717 wrote: | | SO I am considering getting into hockey this year and the Canucks are standing out as one of the teams I may consider rooting for... Dont know why but they are... I live in the Bay Area so there are tons of Sharks fans out here and I always here about the redwings... Is there a reason I should choose the Canucks? |
Well I don't think people realize how popular the Canucks are around N. America. They have a huge fanbase that probably is only smaller than the Leafs and Rangers. However if it's going to take a winning team to get you into hockey I would go another way. The Canucks will be a good team this year and make the playoffs but they don't have a cup coming anytime soon IMO. If you want a team that likely won't ever be at the bottom of the standings and will always spend whatever it takes to win though the Canucks are a good choice.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoMoney717
Joined: 12 Dec 2004
Posts: 2943
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hmm. OK I think I will do a bit more research... The easy way would be to just jump on the Sharks bandwagon... We will see how it goes...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
this providence
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 10963
Location: Ugh.
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoMoney717 wrote: | | Hmm. OK I think I will do a bit more research... The easy way would be to just jump on the Sharks bandwagon... We will see how it goes... |
If you're open to any team at the moment, I would go with the Blues. They are pretty offensive minded at the moment but not all there yet. They are just about to come out of a rebuilding stage and have elite young talent that is about to rise to the top. They are going to be an unbelievable team in a couple of seasons.
Besides, no one wants to be a Canucklehead. Not on purpuse that is. I mean just look at that uni. Ish!  j/k
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TCP
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 5287
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| billzz wrote: | Luongo>>>>Kipp
Im calling the Canucks in the playoffs in 08 |
Well no crap buddy.
Iginla>>>>>>>>>>Hecht
Flames have the third biggest fan base I'd say. Most Leaf/Habs fans are Flames fans when it comes to the West, and in terms of the open provinces in the praries(Saskatchewan and Manitoba) they are both Flames provinces.
If your going to root for a team go for the Kings.
You are in that area(you can access a game- maybe even via Caltrain) easily, they have tons of young talent at the front and back and a great goalie in the system. Endure 2-3 years of losing/medioctrity before your team takes over.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29481
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Canucks beat the Red Wings 4-3 in OT.
Goals by:
Jannik Hansen (1)
Ryan Kesler (2)
Mason Raymond (1)
Alex Burrows (3)
Canucks move to 3-1
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Packerfaninmn
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 6800
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
How about Gaborik for Kessler and Mitchell? Sounds like a fair trade to me.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
