Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

GAMEDAY THREAD: Raiders vs. Chiefs - Week 10
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22602
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:27 pm    Post subject: GAMEDAY THREAD: Raiders vs. Chiefs - Week 10 Reply with quote



VERSUS




GET THE BROOM READY, TIME TO SWEEP SOME CANSAS KITY CHIEFS!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dat Raider


Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 4534
Location: London aka LDN
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lol Let's slapbox with KC. Ima slap the ish outta them Very Happy
_________________
RIP Al Davis. Thank you for this team
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROB GIZZLE


Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 2999
Location: Harbor Area
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LETS START THE SECOND HALF RIGHT...
sweeping the quiefs would be sweet....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Al davis=0-16


Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Posts: 5577
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14917
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Somehow I think Chaz isnt gonna play I hope he makes it through practices all week. He was supposed to be back week 2.
DHB??????????????
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaiderX


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 20544
Location: Crown Town, CA
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gallery, Green, Schilens, and McFadden all set to return at Home against the Chiefs.

We got this. But then again we had it last season and Cable pulls the Fake Field Goal......

Nah, We got this Cool
_________________

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22602
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Chiefs defense is ranked 30th for a reason. Get McFadden involved on the edge, Bush/Fargas inside and don't get cute.

My fear is with the return of Chaz, we see more 3 wide sets (as Cable has talked about) and Russell makes early mistakes, puts the team in a hole and Cable shuts down the pass game (see, SD game).

This is an easy win if the team is up for it. The Cheifs are as bad as I can remember a Chief team being. They take sacks, give up huge plays in the passing game, don't run the ball well.

Simple game plan. Execute, Execute Execute. That's it, play smart hard football and it's an easy victory.

Make stupid mistakes, penalties, turnovers and let them stay in the game, they can win it. Execute properly, play smart and it's a win.

I won't predict this game as I don't know what Jekyll and Hyde version of the Raiders we will get. And I don't trust Russell to move an offense, even against an inferior defense.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
91jmay


Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 24725
Location: Wonderland
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

agree with the above, except i wouldn't give McFumble the ball unless both other RB's fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Jamethus92


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4985
Location: Colorado Springs
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think if we don't beat KC and we aren't competitive in Denver, Cable might as well start mailing out applications. If we beat KC and potentially Denver, Cable would have a case.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oaktown


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 3250
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Must win game for the Raiders.

Not that they will go to the playoff or anything but they had their bye last week. Their getting several starters back.

Raiders haven't beat KC in Oakland in six years that streak must come to and end.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Re-Drew-Vinated


Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 2342
Location: South San Francisco
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm.. To take the Raiders or not to take them on my parlay card Think
_________________

^^big_palooka on the sig^^

On Buster Davis:
Boltstrikes wrote:
He also lacks the toughness necessary to sell girl scout cookies.

Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pimpinbepimpin


Joined: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 6
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Re-Drew-Vinated wrote:
Hmmm.. To take the Raiders or not to take them on my parlay card Think
Don't do that my ninja, bet the underz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22602
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

91jmay wrote:
agree with the above, except i wouldn't give McFumble the ball unless both other RB's fail.


Lay off McFadden. He'll be fine. He's talented, but need an offense to showcase that talent. The Raiders can't open holes and can't pass the ball. Doesn't give running back a good chance at success.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaisinBran


Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 9979
Location: 925/805
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

big_palooka wrote:
91jmay wrote:
agree with the above, except i wouldn't give McFumble the ball unless both other RB's fail.


Lay off McFadden. He'll be fine. He's talented, but need an offense to showcase that talent. The Raiders can't open holes and can't pass the ball. Doesn't give running back a good chance at success.

Yep, McFadden isn't a downhill runner like Bush or Fargas. We need to get plays where DMAC is out in open space where he can use his speed and elusiveness
_________________

(NFL)=Raiders, (MLB)=A's, (NBA)= Warriors
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Al davis=0-16


Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Posts: 5577
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RaisinBran wrote:
big_palooka wrote:
91jmay wrote:
agree with the above, except i wouldn't give McFumble the ball unless both other RB's fail.


Lay off McFadden. He'll be fine. He's talented, but need an offense to showcase that talent. The Raiders can't open holes and can't pass the ball. Doesn't give running back a good chance at success.

Yep, McFadden isn't a downhill runner like Bush or Fargas. We need to get plays where DMAC is out in open space where he can use his speed and elusiveness


I agree.

We don't need McFadden pounding the rock, that's what we have Bush & Huggy for.

We need to get him out in space either with Tosses, split out wide, or with screens.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38  Next
Page 1 of 38

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group