| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who do the 49ers take with the 1st overall selection? |
| Aaron Rodgers |
|
44% |
[ 4 ] |
| Derrick Johnson |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Cedric Benson |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Alex Smith |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
| Mike Williams |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
nor*cal09
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 4113
Location: Stockton, Cali
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Mr. Brightside wrote: | | When it comes to Lloyd, am I the only one who thinks he is a slot receiver at best? I uhink Battle, Woods and Hamilton have much more potential. |
what team have you guys been watching Lloyd has been the most productive reciever we have the guy has big play ability and hands to go along with it. the guy will be the go too reciever for years to come. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CrackLaden
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lloyd's mighty inconsistent...I think Sullivan will help a lot though. I think Wilson is the better player.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nor*cal09
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 4113
Location: Stockton, Cali
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CrackLaden wrote: | | Lloyd's mighty inconsistent...I think Sullivan will help a lot though. I think Wilson is the better player. |
Wilson was leading reciever because he knew the offense a whole lot better than Lloyd and Lloyd missed about 4 games. Sullivan will make a huge difference I think mostly with Rashaun Woods though. Lloyds inconsistencies were caused more by poor QB play which came pretty much from poor protection. it's hard going threw your progressions when you have a huge d-lineman in your face. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrackLaden
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nor*cal09 wrote: |
Lloyds inconsistencies were caused more by poor QB play which came pretty much from poor protection. it's hard going threw your progressions when you have a huge d-lineman in your face. |
Hey, good to see you've come around...  My opinion of Wilson isn't based on the fact that he was the top receiver amongst the receivers. I just think he has more explosiveness, and is more sure handed. Unless we draft a receiver at the top, I would imagine Woods at #1, Lloyd at #2, Wilson at #3 (or vice versa)...after that, the receivers don't make hardly any contribution in the WCO.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Montana168
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 1095
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | what team have you guys been watching Lloyd has been the most productive reciever we have the guy has big play ability and hands to go along with it. the guy will be the go too reciever for years to come. |
lloyd was our only productive receiver because erickson wouldnt put woods in bczu he was a rookie and no one else is great. i think we should draft mike williams with the no 1 pick , if we're stuck with it. #1 williams #2 woods #3 lloyd , wilson i dont think is going to be that great , either cut him or use him as a PR/KR. if you have those 3 receiver i think rattay can actually get it done ONLY IF we hav an offensive line. if we dont rebuild our OL we will be 2-14 again next year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
