| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rabbisson 
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 28047 Location: #PoWwWwWvidence
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:20 pm Post subject: Ben Watson |
|
|
|
This guy is a beast. Period. He's the next Ben Coates. _________________
| Iggles wrote: | | This guy gets it. Seriously, the ideas being espoused here need to get to 88 mph so they can go back to the 1950's. |
Last year Brandon Bolden...this year Zach Sudfeld! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ctagmyer
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 1300 Location: Behind you
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| he looks good soo far |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arrington_28
Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ctagmyer wrote: | | he looks good soo far |
yeah he's so quick _________________
dig in the sig by VIKES FOR LIFE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patfan
Joined: 03 Feb 2005 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| saw hin on forst drive but then did not see him again was he hurt ?????????????/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arrington_28
Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| patfan wrote: | | saw hin on forst drive but then did not see him again was he hurt ?????????????/ |
i dont think he was playing _________________
dig in the sig by VIKES FOR LIFE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
braylon4heisman 
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 422
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He has Antonio Gates written all over him.
He is very athletic, one of the best talents on the team for any position |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arrington_28
Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| braylon4heisman wrote: | He has Antonio Gates written all over him.
He is very athletic, one of the best talents on the team for any position |
i was impressed with him even though he wasn't on for that many plays _________________
dig in the sig by VIKES FOR LIFE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShakeNbake2128 
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 Posts: 3808
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He could be a star but you guys have to get rid of Daniel Graham first bc for whatever reason he seems to get the most playing time and its really burning a fire under my [inappropriate/removed] bc I know Watson can be a stud that why I drafted him in my fantasy league but now he don't get to play. Get rid of Graham please! _________________
Charger-man thanks for the sweet sig and Scar for the avatar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canadian_Patriot 
 Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 8701 Location: Halifax
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Forget that... Graham is awesome... we're going to run a ton of double TE sets when the match ups are good for us. Watsons great, but not the best fantasy TE... i could see him having something along the lines of 400-600 yards and 5 or 6 TD's. _________________
Deadpulse on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShakeNbake2128 
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 Posts: 3808
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Graham is good but Watson is easily better and should get the most playing time not Graham. _________________
Charger-man thanks for the sweet sig and Scar for the avatar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatsDynasty2004
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 805 Location: Beantown
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| no way...graham is much better at this point in both of there careers...watson will be fantastic dont get me wrong but right now graham is clearly better then watson...2 or 3 years from now we might have 2 of the top 5-10 best te's in the league....wouldn't that be exciting lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pats_37
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Brownsfan868031 wrote: | | Graham is good but Watson is easily better and should get the most playing time not Graham. |
Graham gets the nod because the guy is a monster in the ground game and is one of, if not the, best blocking TE's in the league..to go along with his size and speed that creat match up problems for LB's and Safties... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatsDynasty2004
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 805 Location: Beantown
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pats_37 wrote: | | Brownsfan868031 wrote: | | Graham is good but Watson is easily better and should get the most playing time not Graham. |
Graham gets the nod because the guy is a monster in the ground game and is one of, if not the, best blocking TE's in the league..to go along with his size and speed that creat match up problems for LB's and Safties... |
perfectly said....my prediction though...in 2 years we will have 2 of the top 8 te's in the league |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ViKingsOWNpackers
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 8166 Location: University of Maryland School of Medicine 2014
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
yea BEn watson got some skillz, he ran a 4.4 at the combine, thats unbelievable for a tightend...he's faster that alot of receivers in the league _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mbare
Joined: 21 Aug 2005 Posts: 25 Location: Queens, New York.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 5:36 pm Post subject: Grahm? |
|
|
|
I agree that Watson has great speed for a Tight End, and he's huge, a great blocker, and still has relatively soft hands, but he won't be replacing Grahm any time soon, even if Watson is better.. The patriots will go with Grahm because he has more expierence and catching abilities, though I think Fauria has better hands.
I don't think he'll be a Tony Gonzalez or early Shannon Sharpe, but Watson definately has a future career in the NFL. He'll probably be an average or above average TE primarily used for blocking. I say his career will be similar to Todd Heap's. Not the best but definately a stand out player. _________________ Heh.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|