| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 75733
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
NFL.com and NFL Network's Steve Wyche reported Monday night that RB Cedric Benson will be out approximately eight weeks with a Lisfranc injury, which would place his return somewhere around the first week of December -- if he doesn't need potentially season-ending surgery.
The Packers can't afford to lose a veteran back like Benson, who leads the team with 248 yards on 71 carries. Their next leading rusher, Alex Green, has just 57 yards and is representative of Green Bay's paper-thin backfield.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000078667/article/cedric-benson-out-for-eight-weeks-with-lisfranc-injury?module=HP11_headline_stack
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vikefan79
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 29761
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Back to passing 45 times a game.......oh wait they did that anyways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SteelKing728
Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Gibsonia, Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
For how much they throw the ball, Benson didn't look horrible out there.
But that surely doesn't help them. I'm guessing they'll just IR him, and give his spot to someone who needs to be activated, or they could go trade for someone.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 75733
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away.
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 48931
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SteelKing728
Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Gibsonia, Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
He'd be a good fit for our's too but we still don't play him. 
(He's young and unproven, but I think he has the skills to be a Chester Taylor type back)
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 75733
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
do we get to point out then to them that they're signing Viking roster castoffs...?
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 48931
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | | vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
do we get to point out then to them that they're signing Viking roster castoffs...? |
Have the times changed, or what
Todman is probably the 2nd best RB the Packers would have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 75733
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
do we get to point out then to them that they're signing Viking roster castoffs...? |
Have the times changed, or what |
what with Crosby missing the field goal that would have tied the Colts game, maybe they should give Longwell a call....
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vikefan79
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 29761
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Maybe that Gurley kid can run the ball. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Captain Viking
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 2627
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | vikingsrule wrote: | | vike daddy wrote: | | is Todman on our practice squad still? they could sign him away. |
Todman would be a good fit for their offense. |
do we get to point out then to them that they're signing Viking roster castoffs...? |
Have the times changed, or what
Todman is probably the 2nd best RB the Packers would have. |
this made my day. Haha. Well played sir. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
disaacs
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 23371
Location: Brownbackistan
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I didn't realize that the Packers actually run the ball anyway.
_________________
Thx to Uncle Buck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
disaacs
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 23371
Location: Brownbackistan
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | Things aren’t going well this year for the Packers, and it’s creating frustration. Which is leading to guys saying things that maybe they shouldn’t be saying.
The latest guy to let his frustration become verbalized is tight end Jermichael Finley. Amid yet another disappointing season for the player who has plenty of potential, Finley blames his lack of production on an absence of chemistry with the team’s quarterback. |
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/12/finley-reiterates-lack-of-chemistry-with-rodgers/
Between his comments and those from other Packers' players (including an "unnamed" one who thinks the refs are out to get them), I think there is clear evidence of a "schism" that will do in the Packers this year.
_________________
Thx to Uncle Buck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 48931
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Finley has played with Rodgers since 2008, I dont understand how there can be a lack of chemistry. That is inexcusable on Finley's part and makes you question Rodgers ability to lead a team and group of receivers. How much does he go out of his way to truly care about all of his receiver, or is Finley simply not worth the effort? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kellerman
Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 3677
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | Finley has played with Rodgers since 2008, I dont understand how there can be a lack of chemistry. That is inexcusable on Finley's part and makes you question Rodgers ability to lead a team and group of receivers. How much does he go out of his way to truly care about all of his receiver, or is Finley simply not worth the effort? |
When it rains it pours I guess. In the past few years, everything has been going the Packers' way. They've had great teams, scored plenty of points, created turnovers, won games, even a superbowl, but now the tide is turning.
They haven't had to deal with this amount of negativity for years. Maybe they got a little sloppy, or took things for granted. I do believe the talent is still there, but it's just not coming together for them right now.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
