| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
goskins
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 120
|
 Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: RANKINGS |
 |
|
|
QB
Ramsey 80
Brunnel 73
Campbell 77
RB
Portis 90
Betts 78
H Back
Cooley 80
Sellers 74
TE
Royal 78
WR
Moss 88
Patten 78
Jacobs (most imporved for 06-07 season) 88 now 75
Mcants (also will improve) 83 now 74
Thrash 77
T
Chris Samuels 89
Janson 82
G
Thomas 84
Dockery 72
C
Rabach 85
DEFENSE
DE
Daniels 77
Wynn 76
Evans 75
DT
Griffen 86
Salavea 78
LB
Arrington 90
Warick 81
Washington 90
Marshall 80
CB
Rogers 80??
Springs 88
HArris 78
Wilds 72
Saftey
Taylor 87
Bowen 85
Clark 81
_________________
GO SKINS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Taylor-36 Portis-26
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 2163
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
QB:
Ramsey 80
Brunell 76
Campbell 71
RB:
Portis 92
Betts 79
FB:
Cooley 81
WR:
Moss 86
Patten 78
Jacobs 74
McCants 72
Thrash 75
T:
Samuels 90
Jansen 87
G:
Thomas 86
Dockery 77
C:
Raybach 83
DE:
Wynn 82
Daniels 78
Evans 71
DT:
Griffin 90
Noble 75
LB:
Arrington 93
Washington 91
Marshall 79
Holdman 77
CB:
Springs 91
Rogers 79
Harris 78
Wilds 70
S:
Taylor 89
Bowen 81
Clark 76 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taylor #36
Joined: 02 Apr 2005
Posts: 65
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| which one is correct? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Taylor-36 Portis-26
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 2163
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Apparently we're just guessing right now, Madden usually releases the info around a month or so before it's released. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
e16bball
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 14974
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I didn't look through all of them, but I'm gonna guess they are a bit low, particularly the first set. For example, Ramsey was 83 last year, so I'm going to assume he won't be lower than that after having a decent season. Same with a few other players, but we'll see soon enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
titans#1
Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 1167
|
| Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| portis will be higher maybe a 96 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LonghornsDJ&CB
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 389
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
LaVar at 95
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wpbsball12
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 532
Location: Alexandria VA
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Portis will not be 96. He didn't have that great of a year. He'll probably end up at about 91-93
_________________
http://sportssavants.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SUPERSKINS (The G.O.A.T.)
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i think he will be in the 96 95 even 9 range he had a nice year with poor offensive line play every game he had 100 yards we won |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SUPERSKINS (The G.O.A.T.)
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i think he will be in the 96 95 even 9 range he had a nice year with poor offensive line play every game he had 100 yards we won
97 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
