| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GoldenboyGB
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 10451
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:58 pm Post subject: Richard Seymour out for six weeks |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | So much for all the Randy Moss talk. The receiver is safe, but the Pats placed All-Pro defensive end Richard Seymour on the physically unable to perform list, meaning he’s out for six weeks. |
http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/patriots/
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lago_vista
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 4639
Location: WHERE MONSTERS DWELL
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
not surprising he gets injured almost every year
_________________
MY GALLERY
WELCOME TO THE GATEWAY |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40612
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is bad. This is really, really bad!
Look at the list of running backs we have to face the first 6 weeks:
Thomas Jones
LaDainian Tomlinson
Marshawn Lynch
Rudi Johnson
Jamal Lewis
Julius Jones/Marion Barber
I'm not that worried about Lynch or Lewis, but L.T. might destroy us if Sey Monster isn't in the lineup. 
_________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoldenboyGB
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 10451
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | This is bad. This is really, really bad!
Look at the list of running backs we have to face the first 6 weeks:
Thomas Jones
LaDainian Tomlinson
Marshawn Lynch
Rudi Johnson
Jamal Lewis
Julius Jones/Marion Barber
I'm not that worried about Lynch or Lewis, but L.T. might destroy us if Sey Monster isn't in the lineup. |
LT is going to be running all overthe pats  . Well at least Jarvis Green will get to show what he can do. Kinda shocking though didnt expect him to go on PUP reserve.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xmike609x
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 9095
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wow we could get off to a pretty bad start now without Seymour and Harrison. 3-3 ?
_________________
Houshyamomma |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoldenboyGB
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 10451
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| xmike609x wrote: | | Wow we could get off to a pretty bad start now without Seymour and Harrison. 3-3 ? |
Jets-W
Chargers-L (unless the pats somehow pull of a magic trick)
Bills-W
Bengals-W
Browns-W
Dallas-W/L
I have watched Dallas alot the past couple years and they are shaky alot of the times so it matters if the pats are healthy and can get moving on offense. No way the pats go 3-3 in the first 6 games.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xmike609x
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 9095
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GoldenboyGB wrote: | | xmike609x wrote: | | Wow we could get off to a pretty bad start now without Seymour and Harrison. 3-3 ? |
Jets-W
Chargers-L (unless the pats somehow pull of a magic trick)
Bills-W
Bengals-W
Browns-W
Dallas-W/L
I have watched Dallas alot the past couple years and they are shaky alot of the times so it matters if the pats are healthy and can get moving on offense. No way the pats go 3-3 in the first 6 games. |
I dont know dude, I think we could.
Jets- W/L
Chargers- L
Bills- W
Bengals- L
Browns- W
Dallas- W/L
_________________
Houshyamomma |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
panthersfo'life
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 6167
Location: Elf Tower, New Mexico
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Not good for you guys but hey atleast its not Brady (unfortunately  )
_________________
 [quote="Mike Matt 2011 in the freakiest looking fruit thread"]I opened this thread expecting to see a picture of Richard Simmons...[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eaglesfan536890
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 12820
Location: Brick, New Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Eh, they'll still be dominant. They have good depth at every position. One loss at DE isn't gonna kill them.
_________________
⇧ryknowssd on the sig⇧
Bird Watch: Brodrick Bunkley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40612
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| eaglesfan536890 wrote: | | Eh, they'll still be dominant. They have good depth at every position. One loss at DE isn't gonna kill them. |
True, we've gotten good play from Jarvis Green at that RE position in Sey Monster's absence in the past, but he does become a liability against the run when he's asked to stay on the field for a long time. Green is best suited to be a 3rd down penetrator. And when the Pats play San Diego he's gonna have to line up against a the Leviathan Marcus McNeill, who's got a good 45 pounds on him. I don't like his chances in that matchup. 
_________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
broncos67
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 18066
Location: Capitol Cit-ay
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's definately a big loss with Harrison being suspended. I think they should be fine but without him, plugging in a less experienced guy will sting until he adapts to the RBs that they'll be facing.
_________________
Thanks, Tzimisce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jagz4life
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 36212
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Wow, that's huge... this is bad for the preseason #1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BoneyMaroney
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 1504
Location: Massachusetts
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Richard Seymour is a key player on the defense......but Vince Wilfork is the key run stopper on the defensive line. The run defense shouldn't suffer too much without Seymour. You'll see a lot of Le Kevin Smith and Kareem Brown on 2nd and 3rd down now.
_________________
| TMX Cowboy wrote: | | Although Tom Brady is a great quarterback, I think he is overrated this year because his receivers make him look better than he is. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
forty six & 2
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 3841
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is pretty much a yearly occurrence now isn't it? The Patriots know how to play without him, they've done it enough, so while it's a notable loss, it's not the Patriots' death knell or anything.
_________________
| Seahawks206 wrote: | | The Seahawks will win 10 games this year. Write it down |
| Fired-Up wrote: | | Rodgers will settle into a 35 TD, 7 INT, 112 QB rating player. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoldenboyGB
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 10451
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| xmike609x wrote: | | GoldenboyGB wrote: | | xmike609x wrote: | | Wow we could get off to a pretty bad start now without Seymour and Harrison. 3-3 ? |
Jets-W
Chargers-L (unless the pats somehow pull of a magic trick)
Bills-W
Bengals-W
Browns-W
Dallas-W/L
I have watched Dallas alot the past couple years and they are shaky alot of the times so it matters if the pats are healthy and can get moving on offense. No way the pats go 3-3 in the first 6 games. |
I dont know dude, I think we could.
Jets- W/L
Chargers- L
Bills- W
Bengals- L
Browns- W
Dallas- W/L |
Jets (W)- Not worried about Thomas Jones or Pennington at all. Only thing im kinda worried about in this game is can the pats offense get in a groove and handle the blitz? Last year the pats started out slow and wouldnt be surprised to see that again.
Chargers(Big fat stinking L)- At first I said LT would have a good game now hes going to have a great game.
Bills (W)- Serious this is the bills...
Bengals (W)- More worried about the pass defense without Rodney but the pats offense can handle the bengals defense. Last time the pats played the bengals the pats were using Troy Brown at corner to cover TJ.
Browns (W)- Err this team is all over the place. Rodney is back during this game.
Dallas (W)- Im changing this to a W. Im not sold on Romo at all and I wasnt into the hype last year. Romo is a good QB but I think teams didnt know what to expect from him. This is a team that beat the colts last year but at the same time lost to the lions. Defense is good but something the pats should be able to handle.
So you have one maybe TWO losses tops and after the bye it should be 3 losses. Thing is before the Seymour thing I wasnt worried at all because James Sanders saw a chunk of playing time last year and has gotten better with time. Now with Big Sey out for 6 weeks thats huge and now Jarvis Green needs to step up and fill Seys giant shoes.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
