Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Joe Staley named starter at right tackle
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jagz4life


Most Valuable Poster (2nd Ballot)

Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 35586
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Finally Kwame Harris will no longer be playing for ANY team.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eaglesfan536890


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 12820
Location: Brick, New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's not a surprise. Why else would they trade up in the first for him?
_________________

ryknowssd on the sig
Bird Watch: Brodrick Bunkley
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Night Angel


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7022
Location: Allentown, PA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eaglesfan536890 wrote:
That's not a surprise. Why else would they trade up in the first for him?


We werent sure if he would be ready to start by the beginning of this season or if his transition to the pro level would take part or an even entire season. Needless to say NinerNation is quite happy with the quick results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
c0insnap


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14859
Location: Chicago, Illinois
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Night Angel wrote:
eaglesfan536890 wrote:
That's not a surprise. Why else would they trade up in the first for him?


We werent sure if he would be ready to start by the beginning of this season or if his transition to the pro level would take part or an even entire season. Needless to say NinerNation is quite happy with the quick results.


Quite happy, indeed.

This has the makings to be a very good 49ers draft.
_________________

Beast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
sackmaster91


Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 3074
Location: Sacramento
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darn... now leonard little will only get 3 sacks against the niners instead of 4 Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
lago_vista


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 4634
Location: WHERE MONSTERS DWELL
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sackmaster91 wrote:
darn... now leonard little will only get 3 sacks against the niners instead of 4 Razz
more like five instead of 4 Applause Applause Applause
_________________

MY GALLERY

WELCOME TO THE GATEWAY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ninerminer49


Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 3090
Location: California
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lago_vista wrote:
sackmaster91 wrote:
darn... now leonard little will only get 3 sacks against the niners instead of 4 Razz
more like five instead of 4 Applause Applause Applause

Or like none instead of 16.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blaze


Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 13734
Location: Houston
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didnt think he wouldd get the spot this early
_________________

TexanNation Roast http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=237149
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
c0insnap


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 14859
Location: Chicago, Illinois
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lago_vista wrote:
sackmaster91 wrote:
darn... now leonard little will only get 3 sacks against the niners instead of 4 Razz
more like five instead of 4 Applause Applause Applause


You do realize that Leonard Little combined for 0 sacks in two games against San Francisco last year?
_________________

Beast
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
blackmonk


Joined: 14 Dec 2006
Posts: 1981
Location: California
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blaze wrote:
I didnt think he wouldd get the spot this early

Me either, but Staley has performed very, very well. There's a good chance he might be the best tackle selected in the draft. I'm not sure how Joe Thomas or Levi Brown have been doing, but Staley has been doing marvelous.
_________________

"Every light must fade, every heart return to darkness!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sundancejoe


Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 3861
Location: Asheville, NC
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forgive my ignorance, but do you run theZBS or an old school in your face blocking style in SF?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jwalter_81


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2085
Location: Harrogate, England
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

old school scheme
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwalter_81


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2085
Location: Harrogate, England
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Joe Staley named starter at right tackle Reply with quote

Tovey21 wrote:
Meeker wrote:
c0insnap wrote:
Anyone interested in Kwame? Laughing


Isnt he a great run blocker, but struggles vs speed rushers? Why not move him inside to guard? Does he have the size for that?


We have attempted this and it failed misserably. Kwame is a great run blocker but has no idea what to do when it somes to pass coverage. His feet are terrible and he is very weak for an offesnive tackle. I also thought we should've moved him to G but he didn't translate very well to the position and thus the draft selection of Joe Staley our new RT


actually, no the 49ers have not tried to move Kwame to G...where and the heck did you get this bogus info from? We've always had him at T, we tried moving Snyder to G but Kwame, no....alot of 49er fans WANTED the team to try him there but they haven't done so...he's 6'7" which is a little to tall for a G anyways, his stance wouldn't be too good plus the 49er G's are fine as it is
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwalter_81


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2085
Location: Harrogate, England
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sackmaster91 wrote:
darn... now leonard little will only get 3 sacks against the niners instead of 4 Razz


who cares, ya'll still can't stop the TANK...we'll see ya'll in a few weeks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Purple-Pride07


Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 17334
Location: Right Behind You
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THE DUKE wrote:
I suppose you could use Kwame as a TE on short yardage and goalline situations. Who knows, maybe he can even catch a pass or two catching the other team completely off guard.


Actually Joe Staley was a TE before making the switch to OT in college...but I dont see him playing TE now that hes gained all that weight to be a lineman.

I wouldnt mind the vikings trading a junk pick, such as a conditional 6th (in other words a pick that will never go to them) for Kwame just as a guy to fight for the RT spot with Ryan Cook....and worse comes to worse, cut em'.
_________________


"When a team outgrows individual performance and learns team confidence, excellence becomes a reality."
--Joe Paterno.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group