| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JCool333
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 12679
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject: Luis Castillo |
 |
|
|
Do you guys think we should still take Luis Castillo after he admitted to using steroids? he used them before the combine only...
If he lasts to our 3rd rounder, I say yes... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Backwoodsboy65
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 6798
Location: Central Florida
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
First of all Castillo is an idiot.
If I were Saban it would be tough to draft somone onto the team in your first season that has used steriods. If he is there in the second day its a possibility.
_________________
FF Member #1000
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCool333
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 12679
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I still say third round is good for him. Unless Mosley or another big hole plugger is available, Id take him... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Backwoodsboy65
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 6798
Location: Central Florida
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
1. Travis Johnson
2. Shaun Cody
3. Antajj Hawthorne
4. Mike Patterson
5. C.J. Mosley
6. Johnathan Babineaux
After these 6 go, then I may begin to consider taking Castillo. Maybe let a couple more go (Ron Fields and guy from Utah...(anyone know his name??)
_________________
FF Member #1000
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCool333
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 12679
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Babineaux and Patterson woudlnt fit our D well. they are undersized-290 pounds or less I believe. Hawthorne would be perfect...He would be the ultimate 3-4 DT...Fields and Mosley would also fit well... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Backwoodsboy65
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 6798
Location: Central Florida
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
right, but I would still pick them over Castillo if I were Saban
_________________
FF Member #1000
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JCool333
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 12679
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Truthfully, i wouldnt pick Patterson or Babineaux unless they were a great value...and I mean GREAT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
